OFRM III Topic 2-1 - Lecture notes 2 PDF

Title OFRM III Topic 2-1 - Lecture notes 2
Course Commercial Law I
Institution The University of Adelaide
Pages 43
File Size 1.2 MB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 68
Total Views 117

Summary

uni adel 2018 lect 2 notes...


Description

TOPIC 2 BASIC OPTION VALUATION Standard Notation Option Boundaries Factors Determining Option Value Put-Call Parity Elementary Pricing of a Call

2

STANDARD NOTATION • • • •

S0 X T r

~ stock price ~ exercise price ~ time to expiration ~ risk-free rate for maturity T with continuous compounding • Usually use most liquid government short-term debt instrument • In Australia it is common to use Bank Bill Swap Reference Rate or shortterm govt bond futures. • Technically, you should use a BBSRR with a duration close to that of the option contract. However, for the examples in this topic, lets assume: • BBSRR = 5%

• • • •

D ST Ca Ce

~ present value of dividends during option’s life ~ stock price at expiration ~ American Call ~ European Call

3

COMPOUNDING FREQUENCY • The compounding frequency used for an interest rate is the unit measurement of time • The more frequent you compound, closer you are replicating real-time.

4

CONTINUOUS COMPOUNDING • At the limit as we compound more and more frequently we obtain continuously compounded interest rates • $100 grows to $100ert when invested at a continuously compounded rate R for time T • $100 received at time T discounts to $100e-rt at time zero when the continuously compounded discount rate is R • Discrete compounding involves (1+r)t • Discrete discounting involves (1+r)-t

COMPOUNDING/DISCOUNTING WITH DERIVATIVES

• In practice continuous compounding/discounting is always used for derivative calculations. • However, in this course you should be able to switch between the two whenever necessary • Example, • PV(X) = (X)(1+r)-t • PV(X) = (X)e-rt

5

6

CALL OPTION BOUNDARIES • Absolute Minimum Value of a Call = $0 • Ce(S0,T,X)  Max{0, S0-PV(X)} • Ca(S0,T,X)  Max{0, S0-X}

Call Price

Intrinsic / Exercise/ Parity Value: S0  X S0 > X X

Stock Price (S0)

S0-X

if S0 > X

0

if S0  X

7

CALL OPTION BOUNDARIES • Example of Arbitrage • Consider 2 portfolios, A & B • Payoff for A • European Call • Bond worth X(1+r)-T • Payoff for B • Share

ST < X 0

ST  X ST– X

X

X

ST < X ST

ST  X ST

• As Portfolio A  Portfolio B then Ce + B  S • Ce  S0-PV(X) or Ce  S - B

CALL OPTION BOUNDARIES

8

• ANZ Jun Call Contract ($15.74, (86/365), $16.0) = $0.52 • Is this option in or out of the money? • Instead of $15.74, let’s pretend S 0 =$17.0 • Intrinsic Value = $1 • Else Arbitrage Profit exists!

• Why is the market price for Call = $0.52 and not $0? • Time Value / Speculative Value ~ reflects uncertainty of stock price at expiration • The longer till expiration, the higher the time value • Time Value = C(S0,T,X) - Max(0,S0-X) = $0.52 for ANZ

9

CALL OPTION BOUNDARIES • Absolute Maximum Value of a Call = $S0 • C(S0,T,X)  S0 • If C = S0 then must have infinite maturity

S

Call Price

Stock Price (S0)

European

Call Price

S

Stock Price (S0)

American

10

CALL OPTION BOUNDARIES • What is the value of an option at expiration? • C(ST,T,X) = Max(0, ST-X)

Max(0,ST-X)

Call Price

X

Stock Price at expiration (ST)

• Is this appropriate for both European and American Options? • Yes

11

FACTORS DETERMINING CALL OPTION VALUE • The Effect of Time to Expiration • Two American calls differing only by time to expiration, T1 and T2 where T1 < T2. • Ca2(S0,T2,X)  Ca1(S0,T1,X)

• At T1 Ca1 = Max(0, S1 – X) whereas this will be the minimum for Ca2 • Due to Time value of the call option. • Time value maximized when at-the-money • Minimized when deep in-/out-of- the money. • Time value decays closer to expiration

12

FACTORS DETERMINING CALL OPTION VALUE Call Option Value Relative to Time Call Price

Max{(0,S0-PV(X)}

Max(0,S0-X) Stock Price (S0)

13

FACTORS DETERMINING CALL OPTION VALUE Example: ANZ Last Sale Price $15.74 Series

Ex Price

Bid

Ask

Last Sale

Vol 000’s

Open Int

Implied Buyer

Volatility Seller

Delta

Annual % Return

Jun Oct

16.00 16.00

.47 .68

.57 .80

.47 .59

216 3

30 1040

16.21 15.78

19.35 18.68

.51 .55

14.02 11.67

Ceteris paribus, a call option is worth less when expiration is closer.

FACTORS DETERMINING CALL OPTION VALUE

14

• The Effect of Exercise Price

• Two European calls differing only by strikes of X1 and X2 (where X1 < X2). • Which is greater, Ce1(S0,T,X1) or Ce2(S0,T,X2)? • By how much? • The difference in exercise prices will be greater than or equal to the difference in call prices.

• Consider 2 portfolios, A (money spread) & B •

ST < X1

Payoff for A

X1  ST < X2

X1 < X2  ST



Buy Ce1(S0,T,X1)

0

ST – X 1

ST– X1



Short Ce2(S0,T,X2)

0

0

-(ST– X2) =X2-X1>0

ST < X1

Payoff for B •

Buy Bond (X2 – X1)

(1+r)-T

• PV(X2-X1)  C1 –C2 • C2  C1 –B

X2 – X1> 0

X1  ST < X2 X2 – X1> 0

X1 < X2  ST X2 – X1> 0

15

FACTORS DETERMINING CALL OPTION VALUE Example: ANZ Last Sale Price $15.74 Series

Ex Price

Bid

Ask

Last Sale

Vol 000’s

Open Int

Implied Buyer

Volatility Seller

Delta

Annual % Return

Jun Jun

15.50 16.00

.72 .47

.84 .57

.73 .47

3 216

6 30

15.51 16.21

19.49 19.35

.65 .51

14.42 14.02

Ceteris paribus, a call option is worth more the lower the exercise price.

16

FACTORS DETERMINING CALL OPTION VALUE • Limits on the Value Difference in Premiums • We know that • (X2 - X1)(1+r)-T  Ce(S0,T,X1) - Ce(S0,T,X2) • Therefore: • X2 - X1 Ce(S0,T,X1) - Ce(S0,T,X2) • X2 - X1 Ca(S0,T,X1) - Ca(S0,T,X2) • The benefit from buying a call with a lower exercise price will not be greater than the difference in exercise prices. • Example: ANZ $16.00 call costs $0.52. Therefore, the maximum I would pay for an ANZ $15.50 call would be $0.52 + $0.50 = $1.02 • The mid-price of the Option is actually $0.78. • As $1.02>$0.78 the value difference statement is true.

17

FACTORS DETERMINING CALL OPTION VALUE • Effect of Dividend Payments • With options pricing, we are NOT interested in the impact of a dividend announcement, but rather the actual payment of the dividend. • We state that once a stock goes Ex-dividend, the new stock value equals S0 – Div • Prior to dividend being paid, S0’ = S0 – PV(Div) • Therefore: • S0 – PV(Div)  Ce(S0,T,X)  Max{0, S0 – PV(X) – PV(Div)} • Example, assume dividend of $0.2 in two days • $15.74 - PV($0.2)> • ANZ Call($15.74, 0.2356, $16.00) > • Max(0, $15.74 - $16.00(1.05)-0.2356 - $0.2(1.05-2/365))

18

FACTORS DETERMINING CALL OPTION VALUE • The option to exercise early • Are American calls worth more than European? • Yes - if it is worth to exercise ( dividends) • Ca(S0,T,X)  Ce(S0,T,X) • Example, call may only be in the money when (S0 – X) and not when {[S0 – PV(Div)] - X}. Better to exercise before dividend date.

• Would you ever exercise an American early on a stock that does not pay dividends? • Exercise now you receive (S0 – X). • However, value of call is intrinsic value PLUS time value!

19

FACTORS DETERMINING CALL OPTION VALUE

• Effect of Interest Rates • Calls save you money • Rather than buying stock, invest extra cash in term deposit. • Higher r, the higher the value for a call.

20

FACTORS DETERMINING CALL OPTION VALUE • Effect of Stock Volatility • The higher , the higher the value of a call. • Why? • No downside risk. • Maximum loss on a call? • Maximum loss on a stock?

• Higher  increases chances of an out-of-money option to become in-the-money.

PUTS

22

PUT OPTION BOUNDARIES • Absolute Minimum Value of a Put = $0 • Pe(S0,T,X)  Max{0, PV(X) - S0} • Pa(S0,T,X)  Max{0, X - S0}

Put Price

Intrinsic / Exercise/ Parity Value: SX X

0

if S0  X

X – S0

if S0 < X

23

PUT OPTION BOUNDARIES • Example of Arbitrage • Consider 2 portfolios, A & B • Payoff for A • Short European Put • Bond worth X(1+r)-T

ST < X - (X- ST) X

ST  X 0 X

• Payoff for B • Share

ST < X ST

ST  X ST

• As Portfolio A  Portfolio B then PV(X) - Pe  S • Pe  PV(X) - S

24

PUT OPTION BOUNDARIES • ANZ Jun Put Contract($15.74, (86/365), $16.0)  $0.60 • What is its intrinsic value? • $0.26. This would have to be the minimum value for Pa • What’s the minimum value for a Pe? • {$16.00(1.05)

–0.2356

- $15.74} ~ (PV(X)-S) = $0.077

• Why is Pa = $0.60 and not $0.26? • Time Value / Speculative Value ~ reflects uncertainty of stock price at expiration • The longer till expiration, the higher the time value • Time Value = Pa(S0,T,X)

- Max(0,X-S0) = $0.60 - $0.26 = $0.34 for ANZ

25

PUT OPTION BOUNDARIES • Absolute Maximum Value of a Put = $X • Pe(S0,T,X)  PV(X) • Pa(S0,T,X)  X

X for a Pa

Put Price

PV(X) for a Pe Stock Price (S0)

26

PUT OPTION BOUNDARIES • What is the value of an option at expiration? • P(ST,T,X) = Max(0, X- ST) Max(0,X -ST) Put Price

X Stock Price at expiration (ST)

• Is this appropriate for both European and American Options? • Yes

FACTORS DETERMINING PUT OPTION VALUE

27

• The Effect of Time to Expiration • Two American puts differing only by time to expiration, T1 and T2 where T1 < T2. • Pa2(S0,T2,X)  Pa1(S0,T1,X) • At T1 Pa1 = Max(0, X - S1) whereas this will be the minimum for Pa2 • Due to Time value of the put option. • Time value maximized when at-the-money • Minimized when deep in-/out-of the money. • Time value decays closer to expiration

28

FACTORS DETERMINING PUT OPTION VALUE American Put Option Value Relative to Time Put Price As you reach the termination date, the put price curve approaches the intrinsic value.

PV(X)

Max(0,X – S0) Stock Price (S0)

29

FACTORS DETERMINING PUT OPTION VALUE Example: ANZ Last Sale Price $15.74 Series

Ex Price

Bid

Ask

Last Sale

Vol 000’s

Open Int

Implied Buyer

Volatility Seller

Delta

Annual % Return

Jun Oct

16.00 16.00

.55 .66

.65 .78

.57 .76

105 26

2 11

16.74 17.03

19.92 20.01

-0.52 -0.49

9.30 7.33

Ceteris paribus, an American put option is worth less when expiration is closer.

FACTORS DETERMINING PUT OPTION VALUE

30

• The Effect of Exercise Price • Two European puts differing only by strikes of X1 and X2 (where X1 < X2). • Which is greater, Pe1(S0,T,X1) or Pe2(S0,T,X2)? • Difference in put price will not be greater than the difference in the exercise prices: • Consider 2 portfolios, A & B • • •

• •

Payoff for A Write Pe1(S0,T,X1) Take Pe2(S0,T,X2)

ST < X1 -X1 + ST X2 -ST

X1  ST < X2 0 X2 -ST

SUM

X2 – X1>0

X2-ST>0

Payoff for B Buy Bond (X2 – X1) (1+r)-T

ST < X1 X2 – X1> 0

X1  ST < X2 X2 – X1> 0

Therefore, portfolio B  portfolio A

X1 < X2  ST 0 0

X1 < X2  ST X2 – X1> 0

FACTORS DETERMINING PUT OPTION VALUE

31

Example: ANZ Last Sale Price $15.74 Series

Ex Price

Bid

Ask

Last Sale

Vol 000’s

Open Int

Implied Buyer

Volatility Seller

Delta

Annual % Return

Aug Aug

16.00 15.50

.55 .32

.65 .40

.57 .35

105 105

2 1

16.74 16.87

19.92 19.55

-0.52 -0.37

9.30 9.70

Ceteris paribus, a put option is worth less the lower the exercise price.

32

FACTORS DETERMINING PUT OPTION VALUE • Limits on the Difference in Premiums • We know that • (X2 - X1)(1+r)-T  Pe(S0,T,X2) - Pe(S0,T,X1)

• Therefore: • X2 - X1 Pe(S0,T,X2) - Pe(S0,T,X1) • X2 - X1 Pa(S0,T,X2) - Pa(S0,T,X1) • The cost from buying a put with a higher exercise price will not be greater than the difference in exercise prices. • Example: ANZ $16.00 put costs $0.60. ANZ $15.50 put costs $0.36. Therefore, • (16 – 15.5) > (0.60 – 0.36)

33

FACTORS DETERMINING PUT OPTION VALUE

• Effect of Dividend Payments • Stock Value now equals S0 – PV(Div) • Therefore: • PV(X)  Pe(S0,T,X)  Max{0, PV(X) – [S0 – PV(Div)]}

34

FACTORS DETERMINING PUT OPTION VALUE

• The option to exercise early • Are American puts worth more than European? • Pa(S0,T,X)  Pe(S0,T,X) • There is always a sufficiently low stock price that will make it optimal to exercise an American put early. • Dividends on the stock reduce the likelihood of early exercise.

35

FACTORS DETERMINING PUT OPTION VALUE

• Effect of Interest Rates • Puts delay the sale of a stock • Rather than selling stock now, you do so in the future at a cost of r. • Higher r, the lower the value for a put.

36

FACTORS DETERMINING PUT OPTION VALUE

• Effect of Stock Volatility • The higher , the higher the value of a put. • Why? • No downside risk. • Maximum loss on a put?

• Higher  increases chances of an out-of-money option to become in-the-money.

37

PUT-CALL PARITY Put-Call Parity Call

Put

Stock

Risk-Free Bond

38

PUT-CALL PARITY • Consider 2 portfolios, A & B • Payoff for A • Take European Put • Buy Share

• Payoff for B

ST  X X – ST ST

ST  X

• Take European Call • Buy Bond worth X(1+r)-T

• S0 + Pe(S0,T,X) = Ce(S0,T,X) + X(1+r)-T

0 X

ST > X 0 ST

ST > X ST - X X

39

PUT-CALL PARITY • Other common expressions: • Pe(S0,T,X) = Ce(S0,T,X) + X(1+r)-T - S0 • S0 + Pe(S0,T,X) - X(1+r)-T = Ce(S0,T,X)

• What about American Options? • Ca(Ś0, T, X) + X + PV(Div) ≥ • S0 + Pa(Ś0, T, X) ≥ • Ca(Ś0, T, X) + X(1+r)-T

40

PUT-CALL PARITY • Example 1

• ANZ Put($15.74, (86/365), $16.0)  $0.60 • ANZ Call($15.74, (86/365), $16.0)  $0.52 • 30 Day Bank Swap Rate = 5% • Why is Put > Call price? • Does Put-Call Parity hold? • Call + Bond[$X]  Put + Share  Call + PV(Bond[$X]) • 0.52 + 16  0.60 + 15.74  0.52 + 15.82 • 16.52  16.34  16.34 • Even if the above does not hold: • incorrect risk-free rate! • no account for dividend payments!

41

PUT-CALL PARITY • Example 2 • How would you show an at-the-money call option must be worth more than an at-the-money put option on the same stock with similar maturities (no dividends)? • C = P + S - PV(X) • As the options are at-the-money, S=X • C=P+r

42

ELEMENTARY PRICING OF A CALL • The example below tries to look at a simple way we can price options. To help us out, let’s make some assumptions: • 1. A share is currently priced at $10 • 2. To make things simple, we assume that in one year the share will be worth either $11 or $13 • 3. The risk free rate of interest (rf) is 12% per annum. • 4. You can buy a call option that also expires in a year, with an exercise price of $12 What is the Price of the Call?

43

ELEMENTARY PRICING OF A CALL • To Solve this problem, lets try to replicate the payoff of a call by holding a portfolio of bonds and stocks…. • 1. Buy a risk free asset worth the present value of the expected minimum share value in one year {$11} : 11/(1+rf) = $9.82 • 2. Now, our minimum payoff in one year’s time is $11 • 3. If, however, the share in one year is worth $13, the payoff of one call option is only $1 { $13 - $12 } • 4. Therefore, buying 2 call options {payoff = $2} plus buying a risk free asset with a payoff of $11, will yield the same result as owning the share • Share Value rf asset value • $11 $11 $13 $11 • S0 = 2 * C0 + $11 / ( 1.12) • C0 = $0.09

Value of 2 Calls Total $0 $11 $2 $13...


Similar Free PDFs