Title | Outline Summary Insanity Automatism |
---|---|
Author | Zo Blas |
Course | Criminal Law |
Institution | Nottingham Trent University |
Pages | 2 |
File Size | 131.6 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 27 |
Total Views | 129 |
Summary of Insanity...
Defect of Reason = No
Not insane (R V Clarke)
Defect of Reason = Yes
From a DOM?
NO
D is not insane
Did D appreciate the physical nature and quality of his act?
Did D realise his ac was legally wrong?
NO – D is insane YES – D is not insane 15 December 2020
the automatism due to a DOM?
Is the automatism due to a DOM? NO – non-insane automatism
YES – insane automatism
Is the t automatism selfinduced?
Specific Intent
NOT Guilty D has no specific intent
NO – D is not guilty (if ttotal loss of control/exterrnal factor)
es – D is guilty the basic intent crime
15 December 2020
No – was D aware that h his action might make him m ‘aggressive, unpredictable or uncontrolled’?
Basic Inten
YES - is it due to voluntary intoxication by alcohol or a ‘dangerous’ drug?
Yes – D is guilty
NO – D is no guilty...