Title | POL2127 Lec 7 - Lecturer- Kay Hearn |
---|---|
Course | Australian Government |
Institution | Edith Cowan University |
Pages | 4 |
File Size | 65.3 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 97 |
Total Views | 116 |
Lecturer- Kay Hearn...
POL2127 Lec 7 Pressure Groups
Plebiscite
Weekly estimates of the running total will be published by the ABS
No results, just a tally of how many have responded
The influence of lobbyists
“Some of these factional warlords have commercial interest in dealing with politicians whose pre- selections they can influence. Now this is a potentially corrupt position,” Tony Abbot
What is a pressure group?
“A pressure group is an organisation which seeks as ones of its functions to influence the formulation and implementation of public policy” (Grant 2000)
As fewer people vote and join political parties, the number and size of pressure groups seems to rise and rise
The ‘informal force’ of politics
Conservative leadership foundation
Values o
Limited government
o
Personal responsibility
o
Free enterprise
o
Traditional values
Get up
“GetUp is one of Australia’s largest campaigning communities, with a membership of over 800 000 people. We’re an independent, grassroots, community advocacy organisation that seeks to build a more progressive Australia and hold politicians to account.”
The Board is made up of academics, activists, legal professionals
“Members take action on maters which are important to them. Whether it is campaigning on climate actions, economic fairness, environmental sustainability or issues of social justices, GetUp members combine to demand beter from our government, big business and media.”
Differ from parties
Party wants to win control of government or at least a share off office to implement policies
Parties are broad coalitions that have to aggregate interests, groups often single issue
Parties run candidates in elections, but note ‘interest parties’
Think tanks
Grant’s definition encompasses think tanks even though they do not engage in lobbying
May have a close relationship with a political party, e.g. Fabian Society
Can be influential
Changing terminology
A search for ‘hurrah words’ to describe pressure or interest groups
Stakeholders- used by government and EU
Non- governmental organisations
Campaigning groups
Advocacy groups
Pressure groups share 3 main features
They seek to exert influence from outside, rather than to win or exercise government power
They typically have a narrow issue focus
In some cases, they may focus on a single issue
Their members are united by either a shared belief in a particular cause or a common set of interests
Types of pressure groups
There are many ways categorising pressure groups o
Greenpeace
o
Bye planet
Causal/ sectional groups
Sectional groups represent a section of the community
Cause groups represent a belief or principle
Insider/ outsider typology
Developed by Grant (1978)
Insider/ outsider groups cuts across traditional sectional/ cause distinction
Insider groups recognise as legitimate by government
But had to abide by rules of the political game which imposed constraints
Outsider groups
A more disparate category
Include ‘would be’ insider groups outside groups by necessity
Ideological or protest groups who do not want to be drawn into embrace of government
Implication of typology that insider groups more likely to succeed- but not always
Easier to become an insider
Reinforced by work of page- insiders outnumbered pure outsiders by nine to one
Not that hard to be places on a consultation list. Blair Govt. has consultation code
Internet lowers costs of formation, mobilisation and involvement
Being involved in consultation is not same as real access to policy makers
Tim Wilson
Director of the Institute of Public Affairs for 7 years
Director of Climate Change Policy and Intellectual Property and Free Trade
Human Rights Commissioner
Now the member of Goldstein
Pursuing both strategies
One can pursue both strategies simultaneously- Greenpeace
But does set up tensions within a group, Greenpeace very hierarchical and hence can control them
In some areas now insider and outsider groups- National Farmer Unions and Farmers for Action
Most important criticism
Nature of society and political process has changed
Far more groups representing a more fragmented society
Outsider groups becoming more successful, hence undermining one of key points of distinction
Growth of direct action
Ways to influence . . .
These include: o
Ministers and civil servants
o
Parliament
o
Political parties
o
Public opinion
o
Direct action
Success may mean:
Affecting government policy- policy making power
Pushing an issue up the political agenda- agenda setting power
Changing people’s values, perceptions and behaviour- ideological power
Lobbying
Serious professional lobbying has spread way beyond the lobbies of the buildings of parliaments to such activities as
o
Cup of coffee in cafes
o
Dinners in fancy restaurants
o
Christmas drinks parties
o
Hospitality tents at golf comps
o
Private boxes at AFL matches
o
Travel and donations to political parties and individual candidates
National reform summit
The Australian, The Australian financial Review and KPMG
Convened by former federal Labor trade minister Craig Emerson and Nick Cater, director of the Menzies Research Centre
Business groups, unions, welfare group etc
“Every proposal that is put up it immediately opposed by an interest groups and that then gives encouragement to the other political party to seek to harvest the support of the interest group and oppose the reform” said Craig Emerson...