POL2127 Lec 7 - Lecturer- Kay Hearn PDF

Title POL2127 Lec 7 - Lecturer- Kay Hearn
Course Australian Government
Institution Edith Cowan University
Pages 4
File Size 65.3 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 97
Total Views 116

Summary

Lecturer- Kay Hearn...


Description

POL2127 Lec 7 Pressure Groups

Plebiscite 

Weekly estimates of the running total will be published by the ABS



No results, just a tally of how many have responded

The influence of lobbyists 

“Some of these factional warlords have commercial interest in dealing with politicians whose pre- selections they can influence. Now this is a potentially corrupt position,” Tony Abbot

What is a pressure group? 

“A pressure group is an organisation which seeks as ones of its functions to influence the formulation and implementation of public policy” (Grant 2000)



As fewer people vote and join political parties, the number and size of pressure groups seems to rise and rise



The ‘informal force’ of politics

Conservative leadership foundation 

Values o

Limited government

o

Personal responsibility

o

Free enterprise

o

Traditional values

Get up 

“GetUp is one of Australia’s largest campaigning communities, with a membership of over 800 000 people. We’re an independent, grassroots, community advocacy organisation that seeks to build a more progressive Australia and hold politicians to account.”



The Board is made up of academics, activists, legal professionals



“Members take action on maters which are important to them. Whether it is campaigning on climate actions, economic fairness, environmental sustainability or issues of social justices, GetUp members combine to demand beter from our government, big business and media.”

Differ from parties 

Party wants to win control of government or at least a share off office to implement policies



Parties are broad coalitions that have to aggregate interests, groups often single issue



Parties run candidates in elections, but note ‘interest parties’

Think tanks 

Grant’s definition encompasses think tanks even though they do not engage in lobbying



May have a close relationship with a political party, e.g. Fabian Society



Can be influential

Changing terminology 

A search for ‘hurrah words’ to describe pressure or interest groups



Stakeholders- used by government and EU



Non- governmental organisations



Campaigning groups



Advocacy groups

Pressure groups share 3 main features 

They seek to exert influence from outside, rather than to win or exercise government power



They typically have a narrow issue focus



In some cases, they may focus on a single issue



Their members are united by either a shared belief in a particular cause or a common set of interests

Types of pressure groups 

There are many ways categorising pressure groups o

Greenpeace

o

Bye planet

Causal/ sectional groups 

Sectional groups represent a section of the community



Cause groups represent a belief or principle

Insider/ outsider typology 

Developed by Grant (1978)



Insider/ outsider groups cuts across traditional sectional/ cause distinction



Insider groups recognise as legitimate by government



But had to abide by rules of the political game which imposed constraints

Outsider groups 

A more disparate category



Include ‘would be’ insider groups outside groups by necessity



Ideological or protest groups who do not want to be drawn into embrace of government



Implication of typology that insider groups more likely to succeed- but not always

Easier to become an insider 

Reinforced by work of page- insiders outnumbered pure outsiders by nine to one



Not that hard to be places on a consultation list. Blair Govt. has consultation code



Internet lowers costs of formation, mobilisation and involvement



Being involved in consultation is not same as real access to policy makers

Tim Wilson 

Director of the Institute of Public Affairs for 7 years



Director of Climate Change Policy and Intellectual Property and Free Trade



Human Rights Commissioner



Now the member of Goldstein

Pursuing both strategies 

One can pursue both strategies simultaneously- Greenpeace



But does set up tensions within a group, Greenpeace very hierarchical and hence can control them



In some areas now insider and outsider groups- National Farmer Unions and Farmers for Action

Most important criticism 

Nature of society and political process has changed



Far more groups representing a more fragmented society



Outsider groups becoming more successful, hence undermining one of key points of distinction



Growth of direct action

Ways to influence . . . 

These include: o

Ministers and civil servants

o

Parliament

o

Political parties

o

Public opinion

o

Direct action

Success may mean: 

Affecting government policy- policy making power



Pushing an issue up the political agenda- agenda setting power



Changing people’s values, perceptions and behaviour- ideological power

Lobbying 

Serious professional lobbying has spread way beyond the lobbies of the buildings of parliaments to such activities as

o

Cup of coffee in cafes

o

Dinners in fancy restaurants

o

Christmas drinks parties

o

Hospitality tents at golf comps

o

Private boxes at AFL matches

o

Travel and donations to political parties and individual candidates

National reform summit 

The Australian, The Australian financial Review and KPMG



Convened by former federal Labor trade minister Craig Emerson and Nick Cater, director of the Menzies Research Centre



Business groups, unions, welfare group etc



“Every proposal that is put up it immediately opposed by an interest groups and that then gives encouragement to the other political party to seek to harvest the support of the interest group and oppose the reform” said Craig Emerson...


Similar Free PDFs