Title | PSY 3339 Tutorial Notes |
---|---|
Course | Applied Child Psychology |
Institution | Macquarie University |
Pages | 67 |
File Size | 5.1 MB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 111 |
Total Views | 140 |
All the tutorial notes...
PSY 3339 TUTORIAL NOTES
Donna Keely -> honours course
Presentation - Each student picks ONE side - Make sure that each person covers different arguments for their side - 6-minute limit - Describe your viewpoint and the supporting evidence - Evaluate methodological concerns - Make suggestions for future research - Discuss the policy/practical implications of your viewpoint - Engage the class at the end of your talks!
WEEK 4: METHODOLOGICAL AND CRITICAL APPRAISAL WEEK 4: methodological and critical appraisal Development of lying to conceal a transgression: children’s control of expressive behaviour during verbal deception
Need cognitive skills
Tells us about their moral development
Detecting children’s lie telling
Successful liars regulate: - Verbal expressive behaviour - Non-verbal behaviour
Feldman and colleagues (1979; 1980) ‘ - Children are bad at pretending to like/dislike stimuli (I.e. taste)
Lewis et al.’s (1989) Temptation resistance paradigm: - Children told not to a peek at an object….
Today’s task 1. Children’s abilities to lie in relation to temptation and resistance 2. Children ages between 3 and 7, no it’s not representative as it only looks at middle to higher class 3. The set up wasn’t representative for a real-life situation 4. 5. The fact that the person the child was lying to be a stranger. May have been a different result if it was a parent or teacher
Children that have stricter household may need to be really good lies, whereas, children that live in a household where you don’t need to lie they may be worse
Lie telling of a younger child is worse than older children
WEEK 5: ESSAY TUTORIAL Essay topics
Pick ONE question
Answer ALL parts of the question
Please include the essay number in the title of your submission
Submit the right file, ON TIME!!
Defining your argument
What does the essay question ask you to do?
What are you trying to convince your readers of? -> your thesis e.g. gender has an effect on individuals’ involvement in prosocial behaviour
Argument needs to be backed up by assertions (reasons) e.g. females tend to behave in more socially caring manners than males
2
Assertions should be based on evidence- empirical and theoretical e.g. 25% of females actively participated in relief efforts following hurricane Katrina, compared to 10% of males
Writing the essay
Reading widely! There is plenty of literature on all of the topics
More readings -> more arguments -> a better essay!
Keep notes on your readings so you know who to reference
Decide on which arguments you want to use for your essay
Organise your ideas so the paragraphs flow logically
Essay Structure
Introduction: introduce the issue, outline where this essay is going
Define some key concepts e.g. gender + pro-social behaviour you would want to define prosocial behaviour
3
Key concepts that need definitions
Body: presents your arguments, and the evidence you have to support your point of view (including critical evaluation of these studies) - Good idea to start by defining key concepts - Each body is its own essay of its own
Paragraph should never be longer than a page -> should be a 1/3 of a page
Each paragraph should have its own mini intro and conclusion
4
When discussing studies, good to integrate discussion of their methods, results, and some critical evaluation (if space allows)
Give a little background of the study that you are going to discuss
Don’t have to describe the whole study
Finding the balance between giving enough information and not wasting valuable words
Conclusion: concluding paragraph/s should summarise your arguments, maybe tying into to the implications of the findings
5
Read back through the intro and see if you convinced the reader and did you talk about everything that you planned to
Referencing
Allowed to use APA 6 or 7
Make sure you mention which apa you are using
Referencing: APA 6th vs APA 7th essentials
What’s different? – in-text – - The in-text citation for works with three or more authors is now shortened right from the first citation. You only include the first author’s name and “et al.” - The running head on the title page no longer includes the words “Running head:”. It now contains only a page number and the (shortened) paper title.
6
Reference list -
When referencing books, social media, etc. the publisher location is no longer included in the reference
-
Surnames and initials for up to 20 authors (instead of 7) should be provided in the reference list.
-
DOIs are formatted the same as URLs (e.g. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.15604)
General style
-
The singular “they” or “their” is endorsed as a gender-neutral pronoun.
-
Instead of using adjectives as nouns to label groups of people, descriptive phrases are preferred (e.g. using “people living in poverty” instead of “the poor”)
WEEK 6 TUTORIAL NOTES Peers vs Parents influence over their children’s development Peers have most influence
Definitions:
Children: individuals under the age of 18
Peers: children of a similar age range
Note: non-parent primary caregivers are considered in the definition of parents
Outline: peers influence on children’s development
Social cognitive theory bandura
How peers influence child’s cognitive development in learning environments
How peers influence children’s personality/social behaviour
Policies/practical implications for the future to help child development
Social cognitive theory in the classroom Bandura 1987
MODELLING -The social-cognitive theory is a theoretical perspective in which learning by observing others is the focus of study.
How peers influence child’s cognitive development in learning environments
7
The current longitudinal study, the ability level and how skilled the peers are in a child's classroom has shown direct and positive effects on the child's cognitive skills, pre-reading skills, and expressive language skills
Sample: The data used for this study were drawn from the Early Childhood Study (ECS) in Georgia, which began in 2001. The population included children who lived in Georgia who attended fulltime preschool in 2001–2002
A probability sample included three groups of children (1) children enrolled in Georgia’s Pre-K Program; (2) children attending Head Start as four year olds; (Head Start is a national program that provides developmental services for low-income preschool children) (3) children attending private pre schools (private preschools are schools or child care centers that offer educational and developmental programs for four year olds in exchange for tuition or fees for these services)
Measures
Developmental skills: Three types of developmental skills were measured for each child in the study at the beginning of preschool and the beginning of kindergarten. - cognitive skills, - two measures of language or pre-reading skills were taken, - An additional pre-reading skill was administered at the beginning of preschool and the beginning of kindergarten
Findings and policies/practical implications
The study showed that neither time spent on discipline, nor teachers motivations explain the influences of peers on children’s skill development
Future policies/practical implications - Research on peer effects for school-age children has shown disadvantaged children benefit most from peers with higher ability levels - It may be benefical to implement policies that allow a mix of children in classrooms with different abilities, instead of
8
segregating the children in classes based on how skilled the children are Early puberty, negative peer influence, and problem behaviours in adolescent girls
Conclusion
Early puberty in girls has been linked with problem behavior in adolescence. Deviant peer affiliations may play a major role in this relationship, with early-maturing girls being more likely to affiliate with deviant peers and more
susceptible to negative peer influences. However, little is known about the developmental timing and racial/ethnic differences in these processes. This study revealed that early puberty is a risk factor for
9
stable delinquency and transient physical aggression for girls from all major racial/ethnic groups argument 2: parents rather than peers exert significant influence over their children’s development attachment theory
Sroufe (2005): The Minnesota Study
10
11
12
13
14
WEEK 7 Tutorial notes Physical punishment Argument 1: Parents should be able to physically punish their child if they want to
15
Intentional and prudential use of non-abusive physical punishment, as one tool within a wider collection of mild discipline techniques, can be of most benefit to young children
Baumrind (1996)- Theory Commentary Main findings
Effectiveness of discipline method is mediated by the child’s perception of its legitimacy
Use of reasoning, in conjunction with the discipline method, encourages internalization of behavioural control
Non-abusive physical punishment is maximally effective before 6yo: ‘Authority Inception Period’ from Dublin & Dublin (1963)
Physical discipline should be used judiciously to shape socially constructive behaviours
Larzelere (2000)- Literature Review
Updated systematic literature review of child outcomes from nonabusive physical punishment (2 swat spank before timeout) based on Larzelere (1996) and Gershoff (1999). 38 studies were chosen from an inclusion criteria: - Peer-reviewed journal - Child outcome variable for beneficial vs. detrimental outcomes - Includes one measure of non-abusive physical punishment by parents - Referent period for physical punishment to precede period for child outcome measure - Average age of children was under 13 year old
Included studies had methods such as randomised clinical study, longitudinal study, sequential analysis
Main findings
16
2/3 of studies found beneficial or neutral child outcomes
Beneficial at reducing non-compliance & enhanced effectiveness of complementary discipline techniques
92% of articles finding beneficial outcomes had a sample of children with a mean age of less than 6yo
Physical punishment works best when non-abusive, infrequent, flexible and used primarily as a back-up to milder tactics
Argument 2: Parents should be able to physicall punish their children if they want to
Will be focussing specifically on spanking as a form of physical punishment
- International data displays that a majority of children have been spanked within their childhood. Statistics indicate that 300 million children worldwide have been spanked
- Studies show that spanking administered by warm and loving parents who hold good intentions in a non-abusive environment can be an effective form of punishment. The empirical research I will be drawing upon further supports and draws upon this idea.
17
Guarendi (1990)- Observational Project
18
PARENTS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO PHYSICALLY PUNISH THEIR CHILDREN IF THEY WANT TO
19
ARGUMENT 2
All forms of corporal punishment are predictive of externalising problems (aggression, intimate partner violence/dating violence) in both the short (childhood) and long term (adulthood)
Externalising problems are “characterised primarily by actions in the external world, such as acting out, antisocial behaviour, hostility and aggression”
20
21
22
ARGUMENT 3
23
Physical punishment does not teach them the difference between right and wrong
Can lead to long term cognitive deficits
Elevates risk of mental health disorders during adolescence
Elizabeth Gershoff (2002)- Corporal Punishment by Parents and Associated child behaviours and experiences: a meta-analytic and theoretical review
Lack of moral internalisation
Children may learn to resolve conflicts through the use of physical aggression
May lead to delinquent, criminal, or antisocial behaviour
Methodological concerns
Measuring parental corporal punishment at one point in time and future child behaviour may not be enough to infer causal direction
Relies on studies in which data of disciplinary practices was gathered through parental reporting or adolescent recollections, rather than observations
Varied definitions on what constitutes physical punishment
Gershoff accounted for these methodological issues by not granting causal conclusions, rather presenting correlations between effects
Iragaray et al. (2013)- child maltreatment and later cognitive functioning: a systematic review
Maltreatment during childhood has negative effects on cognitive functioning
Children subjected to corporal punishment exhibited substantial memory impairment
Adolescents who had suffered harsh physical punishment as children performed worse on tasks designed to measure attention
Children who suffer physical punishment often perform worse at school
Methodological concerns
24
Prior studies into the effects of physical punishment on cognition suffered from the following shortcomings:
No standardization of assessment in cognitive function Small sample size Adult centred samples - recall bias Wide variability in study design to identify maltreatment
Ferguson et al. (1997) Physical punishment/maltreatment during childhood and adjustment in young adulthood
Children who are spanked more frequently display more socioemotional problems
The use of physical punishment may affect attachment bonds between parent and child, leading to poorer parent-child relationship
Children often possess lower self-esteem in cultures where physical punishment is not normative behaviour
Children may internalize their reactions to physical punishment, and become sad, fearful, or withdrawn.
Methodological concerns
Elevated risk of mental health disorders may be accounted by social and contextual factors
Retrospective reporting
Lack of cultural diversity of subjects
Policy/practical implications
Corporal punishment is still legal in Australia
Parents and guardian must be educated on the long-term effects of physical punishment
Defence of “reasonable” corporal punishment must be abolished
The United Conventions on the Rights of the child, which Australia has ratified, states that accords children rights against “all forms of violence and against degrading treatment or punishment
Future research
Conditions under which corporal punishment is more likely to occur
Corporal punishment with same sex parents
25
Cross cultural validity
Standardising definition and measures of corporal punishment
Determining causal direction
Overall thoughts of the class
Different forms of physical punishment -> spectrum
mild gender differences
more boys with corporal punishment
mothers tend to spank children more than fathers
WEEK 8 children are reliable vs unreliable witnesses Argument 1: children are NOT reliable witnesses 1. unintentional false report- production of spontaneous false memories 2. intentional false report- coaching by adults spreading activation and spontaneous false memories
spontaneous memories ae caused by internal spreading activation process whereby a word or concept activates related items
negative life experiences of maltreated children sensitise them towards negative items, and once encountered, would automatically
26
activate memory representations, and spreads to related concepts that were not there at a time of encoding Baugerud, Howe, Magnussen and Melinder (2016)
27
Participants: -
Thirty-one 8-12-year-old non-maltreated children and twenty-six 712-year-old maltreated children.
-
Middle-class
-
SES background
-
Participants were recruited from same geographic location
Method – -
Both groups of children were tested on the Deese/Roediger– McDermott (DRM) false memory task
-
Word lists with neutral words and negative emotional words were presented
-
After a 15 second distractor task, participants were asked to recall all the words from the list.
Methodological concerns: -
Small sample size- low statistical power
-
Low external validity>
90% of non-maltreated children and 63% of maltreated children had caucasian backgrounds
>
Similar SES
>
Maltreated individuals were on the extreme end of maltreatment spectrum
Major findings -
Maltreated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop spontaneous negative false memories for negatively emotional items than their non-maltreated counterparts.
-
Negatively emotional words lead to a growth in child’s emotional false memories over time
Baugerud, Howe, Magnussen & Melinder(2016) & Howe, Candel, Otgaar, Malone & Wimmer (2010) ...