PSY450 Ethicsc CH 4 - lecture notes on the ethical guidelines of an experiment PDF

Title PSY450 Ethicsc CH 4 - lecture notes on the ethical guidelines of an experiment
Course Advanced Research Methods in Psychology
Institution University at Buffalo
Pages 4
File Size 91.7 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 18
Total Views 142

Summary

lecture notes on the ethical guidelines of an experiment...


Description

Establishing Ethical Guidelines The Belmont Report (1979) identifies three basic ethical principles for protecting human subjects ● Respect for persons ○ Individuals should consent to participation ■ Those who cannot consent need extra protection





Beneficence ○ Do not harm ○ Minimize risks, maximize benefits Justice

○ Fairness ■ Ex. in selecting participants First code of ethics in psychology - 1953 ● For both clinical practice and research Most recents revision of code of ethics in 2002 ● 5 General Ethical Principles ○ Suggested guidelines, not standards or obligations ● 89 Specific Ethical Standards ○ Clustered into ten different categories ○ Specific rules to provide the basis for changes of unethical conduct

Five Principles of APA Ethics Code Beneficence and Non-Malfeasance: constantly weigh costs and benefits; achieve the greatest goof Fidelity and responsibility: constantly be aware of responsibility to society; always exemplify the highest standards of professional behavior Integrity: be scrupulously honest in all aspects of the profession Justice: always treat people fairly; reduce bias Respect for people right and dignity: safeguard the welfare and protect the rights of participants

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Categories of Ethical Standards Resolving ethical issues Cometence Human relations Privacy and confidentiality advertising/public statements Record

APA Code of Ethics: Major Issues No Harm ● Subjects must be protected from physical and psychological harm ○ Minimize risks ○ Any possible risks must be justified ○ Halt studies if necessary ● Clinical Equipoise - only providing the best possible treatment to participants ○ Problem: eliminates the possibility of control groups in clinical traits

Informed Consent ● Subjects must be given sufficient information about the study so they can make a rational decision to participants (or not) ○ Use easy to understand language (8th grade level) ● No consent needed in some circumstances ○ Some anonymous surveys, educational, analyzing archived data, observational research ● Elements ○ Study’s basic description ○ Approximately how long participation will take ○ Participants may quit at anytime ○ Confidentiality and anonymity ensured ○ Any potential risks ■ May be minimal or non ○ Contact information given (researcher, IRB) ○ Opportunity to obtain final results of the study ○ Signatures ● Special populations ■ Ex. children, prisoners, disabilities ○ Parents or legal guardian give consent ○ Assent also needed (willingness to participate) ○ Researchers must be even more vigilants about… ■ Undue stress ■ Potential risks vs. potential benefits ■ Coercion ● Deception ○ Avoid if possible, but acceptable if approved by IRB ■ Must be reasonable relative to the costs, benefits, and purpose of the study ■ Alternatives to deception must be considered and rejected

○ Cannot conceal possible physical pain or potential severe emotional distress ○ Reveal the purpose and importance of the deception during the debriefing ○ Two forms: ■ Passive Deception (omission): withholding information about the study ■ Active deception (commission): deliberately presenting false or misleading information ○ Confederate: ■ An individual who pretend to be naive to the study, but actually works for the researcher

Confidentiality ● Information obtained is kept secure and private ○ Personal info is collected in research ○ Ensured through anonymity ■ Information cannot be linked to a specific individual ● Strategies to promote confidentiality ○ De-identify data records ○ Use a coding system to link identifiable information to data records ○ Only report aggregated results

IRB: Institutional Review Board At least 5 members including: one member outside the community and one non scientist ● Determines whether the project meets ethical guidelines ○ Some research is exempt from review, gets an expedited review, or requires a full review ● Key factor: degree of risk to subjects ○ No risk (could be exempt) ○ Minimal risk (as in everyday life) (expedited) ○ At risk (greater risk than in everyday life) ( full ) ●

Ethical Issues and Nonhuman Subjects APA ethical guidelines for animal research: ● Must be conducted by qualified individuals ● Research must be justified ● Minimize harm and discomfort ○ Includes the general care and maintenance of animal subjects ■ Housing conditions, food, medical care for animals

IACC = The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee ● At least 5 members including: a vet, a scientist experienced in animal research, a non scientist, someone who has no ties to the institution

Ethical Issues and Scientific Integrity Fraud (in science) ● An explicit effort to falsify or misrepresent data ○ Not the same as error (honest mistake) ● Varying degrees of falsifying data ○ Confabulating data, omitting data, photoshopping/altering data, suppressing entire study Why do researchers commit fraud? ● Individual weakness ○ To remain competitive ● Sloppiness ● The “publish or perish” climate in academia Safeguards to prevent fraud ● Studies that are designed to be replicated ● The peer review process ● Significant consequences of being found guilty of fraud (acts as deterrent)...


Similar Free PDFs