Self & Collective Efficacy PDF

Title Self & Collective Efficacy
Author Chelsie-Jane Mason
Course Applied Sport and Exercise Psychology
Institution Cardiff Metropolitan University
Pages 5
File Size 729.9 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 62
Total Views 165

Summary

Download Self & Collective Efficacy PDF


Description

Self & Collective Efficacy COMPARISON OF SOURCES OF SE & SPORT CONFIDENCE

SELF EFFICACY “A belief in one’s capabilities to organize and execute the course of action required to produce given attainments” (Bandura, 1997) Theory

COLLECTIVE EFFICACY A group’s shared belief in its conjoint capabilities to organize and execute the courses of actions require to produce given levels of attainment (Bandura, 1997, p. 477)

Simply stated - Athletes’ confidence in the process of their own team. Not athletes’ confidence in team abilities to obtain a certain outcome. Characteristics  Efficacy beliefs are future-oriented judgments of process  Shared belief of teammates - Shared belief = high degree of agreement or perceptual concensus among member’s judgments. Less variability within teams than between teams. Depends on task interdepence  Dynamic construct  Team confidence-performance link with temporal proximity  Perceptions of personal and interpersonal skills  E.g., coordination, communication, decision making - Integrative capabilities are coordination, communication, and decision making - Low interdependence – CE is aggregation of teammembers’ selfefficacy beliefs Measure Approach 1 Collective efficacy questionnaire for Sport – CEQS Rate your team’s confidence 1. Effort (e.g., to play to its capabilities) 2. Persistence (e.g., to persist when obstacles are present) 3. Preparation (e.g., to devise a succesful strategy) 4. Unity (e.g., to be united) 5. Ability (e.g., outplay opposing team) = outcome oriented.. Approach 2 Observational Collective Efficacy questionnaire for Sport Rate your team’s confidence.... 1. To react enthuastically when making a point 2. To have leader figures in the team who believe that we will win the game 3. Players who cheer enthusiastically 4. Encourage eachother during the game 5. Communicate a lot tactically during the game More dynamic measure Effects

Sources

Total of Sources

Leaders’ Confidence in ‘us’ Inspires Performance

Strategies to Improve  Verbal persuasion  Team talks focused on the collective  Tactical communication  Leadership  Display confidence  Believe in ‘us’    

Create mastery experiences Team simulations Mastery-based motivational climate Team goal setting

 Vicarious experiences  Watch video footage of own performance  Watching other teams  Imagery  Positive support commucation  Celebrate success  Encourage eachother  Cohesion  Build task and social cohesion...


Similar Free PDFs