Title | Unit13 - Introduction to International Law. Fundamental principles governing International Relations |
---|---|
Course | Introduction To Law |
Institution | Universitat Ramon Llull |
Pages | 5 |
File Size | 99.4 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 60 |
Total Views | 129 |
Download Unit13 - Introduction to International Law. Fundamental principles governing International Relations PDF
MarLópezBarreiro 1ºInternationalRelations20152016 UNIT 13 INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL LAW. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES GOVERNINGINTERNATIONALRELATIONS Evolution Sovereignequalityofallstates Selfdeterminationofpeople Prohibitiononthreatoruseofforce Peacefulsettlementofdisputes Noninterferenceintheinternalaffairsofotherstates DutyofcooperationwiththemissionoftheUN Goodfaith 1. Evolution 1rstperiod(until2ndWW) ‘Laisserfaire’ attitudewithinthetraditionalinternationallaw No state was powerful enough to impose its will and principles on all other membersofthecommunity Legalprinciplesevolvednaturallybasedonstates’commoninterests ThebasicpostulatessharedbyalltheStates: Freedom To form alliances with whomever a State chose, to enter into agreementsthatwerealignedwiththeirinterests Equality No state had legal authority to impose a set of norms on any other state Effectiveness International law took into account existing power relationships and translatedthemintolegalrules Only those claims and situations which are effective can producelegal consequences 2ndperiod(from2ndWWuntil1970) The massive lost of human life led the states to lay the foundations of a systemtoensurepeaceandsecurity UNbirth–UNCharter 3rdperiod(from1970on) Socialist and developing countries demanded that the UN Charter be expandedsoastoreflectthenewinternationalreality DeclarationonFriendlyRelations( 1970) Unanimouslyagreedprinciplesbutwithnobindingeffect Theresult Sovereignequalityofallstates Selfdeterminationofpeople Prohibitiononthreatoruseofforce Peacefulsettlementofdisputes Noninterferenceintheinternalaffairsofotherstates 1
MarLópezBarreiro 1ºInternationalRelations20152016
DutyofcooperationwiththemissionoftheUNGoodfaith Art.2UNCharteraccordingtotheDeclarationonFriendlyRelations,1970
2. Sovereignequalityofallstates
Afundamentalpremiseonwhichallinternationalrelationsrest Elements: Sovereignty It comprises the authority over individuals living on the territory of asovereignstate 1. To prescribe legally binding norms upon public and private entitieswithinitsterritory ○ Exceptions(extraterritorialauthorityorjurisdiction): i. States may enact laws which are binding on the basis of nationality and consequently, have extraterritorialeffect ii. States may enact laws that regulate conduct that is beyond the territory of the state but is deemedprejudicialtoitsinterests(terrorism) ○ Premise: it may not infringe on the sovereignty of other states by providing enforcement acts that take placeonforeignterritory 2. To adjudicate or settle disputes over legal subjects withinits territoryorsometimesoutsideterritory ○ Principle: Adjudicating disputes is based on territoriality, active nationality (based on nationality of offender), passive nationality (based on nationality of the victim), or the protective principle (jurisdiction overoffensesthataffectsastates’nationalinterest) ○ Exceptions(extraterritorialauthorityorjurisdiction): i. Universal jurisdiction (acts committed by foreignersagainstforeignersonforeignterritory) ● Restrictive and broad approaches (depending on whether the accusedis in thatstate’scustodyornot) 3. Toenforcelegalnorms ○ Acts of enforcement cannot be exercised by a state beyond its territory withoutthe consentofthestate whereenforcementwassought ○ Casesofnonrespectoftheprinciple:abduction i. When the accused is brought to its territory without requesting the cooperation of thestate where the accused resides and without demanding extradition (violation of internationallaw) Legalequality 2
MarLópezBarreiro 1ºInternationalRelations20152016
Allthestatesareequal Theirequalitymaybedisturbedbyfactualfeatures Example: geographical location, wealth, existing natural resources,economicactivity Legal constraints that one state may impose on another state are valid only if that state accepts them knowingly and in its free exerciseofitssovereignty
3. Selfdeterminationofpeople
Aprincipleestablishedin3scenarios: 1. People under colonial domination have the right to external selfdetermination by establishing their own sovereign state or by associatingwithanotherindependentstate 2. Subjectsofmilitaryoccupationhavetheabove2choices 3. Racialgroupsneedtobegivenfullaccesstogovernment a. If it is so denied, they can resort to external selfdetermination (achieve independence or integrate into an existing state) or internal selfintegration (pursuit of economical, political, social and cultural developmentwithinanexistingstate) Rightsanddutiesengenderedbytheprincipleofselfdetermination: Rightsagainsttheoppressorstateandagainst3 rdpartystates Examples: Claim to refrain from sending troops in support of the oppressor Duty: every State is obliged to allow free exercise of the principle and it is notallowedtodenythisrightbyforce 3rdpartystates They have the right to support people entitled to selfdetermination, except forsendingmilitarysupport Theymustrefrainfromhelpingtheoppressor They can claim respect for the principle of selfdetermination from states thatdenyit
Therealimpactoftheprinciple It extends the prohibition on the use of force (force can not be used to deny people’srighttoselfdetermination) It has granted liberation movements the license to use force to respond to denialoftherightbyforce No state can acquire land by annexation if it breaches the principle (a treaty providing for transfer of territories is null and void when no account is taken of the populationinvolved) But… Itsapplicationishasbeenverylimited It is not applied to national, religious and linguistic groups (when they are not deemedtoberacialgroups) 3
MarLópezBarreiro 1ºInternationalRelations20152016 4. Prohibitiononthreatoruseofforce
All member states shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force(UNCharter) Exception:selfdefense Initsorigin,alooseprinciple Not applied to colonial powers in ‘domestic’ conflicts (insurgentsandliberationmovements) Powerful states used economic pressure to subjugate developingcountries Some states resorted to force to conquer foreign territories without sanction from international community (e.g. Israel’soccupationofArabterritories,1967) Nowadays,amorerestrictiveinterpretation The prohibition is valid also in formerly considered ‘domestic’ conflicts if there exists a national liberation movement under one of the 3 selfdetermination scenarios (colonial people, people under foreign occupation, people fallingunderracistregimes) ‘Anticipatoryselfdefense’isprohibited Self defense may not be used to repulse an ‘indirect armed aggression ’ (→ a state tolerates or actively supports terrorist activities against the territory and assets of the attackingstate) Territory may not be acquired through thethreatoruseof force (even if the situation is effective, there is no legal title of sovereignty) Extreme forms of economic force equivalent to threat or use offorceareprohibited
5. Peacefulsettlementofdisputes
When a conflict arises between some states, they can choose any of the mechanisms they have to peacefully settle the dispute (negotiation, mediation, arbitration,judicialresolution) Theydonothavetheobligationofchoosingonemeansoveranother If one means of settlement fails, states are encouraged to pursue other peaceful mechanismsandrefrainfromactionsthatmayleadtothreatoruseforce 6. Noninterferenceintheinternalaffairsofotherstates
Aprincipletoensurethateachstaterespectstherightsofotherstates: Prohibition of interference in the internal organisation of a foreign state (not bringing pressure to influence its institutions, not interfering in the relationsbetweenastateanditsownnationals) ‘Indirectarmedconflicts’ 4
MarLópezBarreiro 1ºInternationalRelations20152016
Can a state allow on its territory an organisation that aims at removing from powerthegovernmentofaforeignstate?
7. DutyofcooperationwiththemissionoftheUN
UNPurposes: Maintaining international peace and security, including the prohibition of the useofforceininternationalrelations DevelopingfriendlyrelationsbetweenStates Achievinginternationalcooperationinsolvinginternationalproblems
8. Goodfaith
States are required ‘bona fide’ to settle any dispute that would arise with other states The principle means fair and open dealing in any interaction. It is deemed to require sincere,honestintentions,regardlessoftheoutcomeofanaction
9. Conclusion
Rights and obligations derived from these principles are erga omnes (applicable toallstatesgeneraleffect) They give legal entitlement to any subject of international law to claim compliance with these principles from any other subject regardless of the existenceofinjury Despite of being valid and applicable to all states, they rely heavily on UN mechanismsforimplementationandenforcement
5...