Vortex Particle theory in relation to Dark energy and Dark matter PDF

Preview

Summary

Vortex Particle theory in relation to Dark energy and Dark matter 5-30-2016 [email protected] This is not an academic paper. It is a request for others to join in or try on your own and look at this line of research as it is not possible for me to go much further. The photos are by Rodney Warren from...

Description

Vortex Particle theory in relation to Dark energy and Dark matter 5-30-2016 [email protected] This is not an academic paper. It is a request for others to join in or try on your own and look at this line of research as it is not possible for me to go much further. The photos are by Rodney Warren from Australia and rendered by Sec Benjamin Franklinotzi. The pics are in support of “Vortex Particle Theory” by Roger Spurr which is a light/energy study.

This is a possible Vortex Particle which is an electron. The right shot is the energies. We have these from red and Green lasers and appear to be a universal pattern when light decelerates after a venturi. The venturi is simply 2 round metal posts. It creates a compression that seems to react with light in the exact same manner as water.

This photo is the 1st and how I found Rodney. It displays exactly what I expected and was waiting for... it is a shower thru a single venturi. Of chaotic particles reforming.

This shot appears to be the wave propagation in flight but?

This shot is decompressing vortex particles showing right hand particle spin.

This is the chaos following the slit. Notice how quickly they start to loose energy.

Finally this is the green vortex particle that was analyzed in a video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ro4X55vJhd4

This is a study about the properties and energies of light. It radiates from every luminous orb in space but what really is it? Could it be a fluid as it is always represented? Is all matter suspended in this fluid? Does it have energy in the vacuum of space? Does matter consume this fluid if it exists? What is lights nature? The sun and all stars emit "light" and it drives solar sails creates electricity in solar panels and produces light heat and grows everything on the surface of Earth. It “pushes sails and electrons and crookes radiometer paddles so it seems likely to have a mass unlike magnetic lines of flux that appear to react with matter in a different way. (to me anyway) I think Light mass is a given. What is the Energy of light...what can light do? Lets not worry about the nuclear events that project these particles lets focus on the particles. The particles are bundles of energy and this is confirmed by the interaction with matter as heat/light etc. What is heat really? It is when energy is “absorbed” and the activity increases and temp increases. What is light really? It is when the energy is “bounced” from the collided matter. Does light absorb and bounce at the same time? Yes it appears to as we get warm and glow simultaneously (if colored lite or white) from the same energy hitting us but we would warm more and glow less if we were painted black. So it appears they work together and distribute according to the needs of the matter they collide with. What about plants, do they absorb vortex particles. Yes and they die without them. Do the plants grow from absorbing them? Yes they do and grow quite a bit and add biomass which is literally stored energy. Does this biomass increase the Earths weight and size? It must and in a significant way. Tests need to be done to see the increase in actual lbs in a completely closed environment and how incresed or decreased light affects the result. It seems obvious but it needs testing. Does light absorb in quantized exact frequencies. Yes this is observed in spectroscopy tests on differing vapors and the frequency missing corresponds to the matter. Does light radiate at only certain quantized frequencies like it absorbs...no that is not observed. Light radiated will fill the spectrum completely I believe except in unusual cases. Why is light dark energy and dark matter as it transits space? We know it left the star as energy and arrived to dispense the energy on Earth lets say. So it is not possible to be energy on each end but not energy in space. It is simply unseen. It is energy as it leaves the star and it is energy until the energy is expended when it "bounces" off of or is "absorbed" by molecules with nucleus particles because they have electron clouds to bounce off of like a soft cushion on a hard floor. These spinning electron particles in the vacuum of space are called Vortex Particles and are simply disassociated electrons (no nuclear bits) spinning with a freq and with an energy equivalent to their mass.

Does an equation exist to illustrate the energies and such? Yes there is. The mass is dictated by angular momentum of the spin which is the frequency factor and nothing to do with whole number quantum states at this point. The mass is approx . 00055amu times its freq factor. The faster the spin the more massive that electron becomes. The equation is E=Mass of Electron at rest .00055amu x frequency of the spin. Vortex solves duality and is observed in light experiments we are doing now. We use venturis to accelerate past normal light speed and crash it into unrestricted space causing Chernenko radiation. There is no other possibility from a venturi. The whole number quantum comes in as the Vortex particle reacts to the matter it hits. If it hits something that needs energy it absorbs a "Quantized" nibble of the energy and the rest bounces off normally (some new nano carbon or such is 100% absorber I think). Is there evidence to support that quantized absorption? This does seem to happen in spectrum analyzers. Which show exact black spectrum lines where the molecule tested absorbed that light. How does this affect the Earth? The Earth consumes and emits Vortex particles but in vastly different amounts. Consider that .00055amu is 1800 times smaller than a single proton so it is small but there are trillions per sec hitting in very small areas so the net will be quite large and therefore I would expect earth is growing rapidly actually. Conclusions are up to you. Is there any other evidence to support this theory? Yes we think so. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_Bm4EUAnnI...