Title | WATER AS ENERGY ABSORBER TO CONTROL THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF THE STRUCTURES |
---|---|
Author | Nishant Rai |
Pages | 254 |
File Size | 15.2 MB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 766 |
Total Views | 838 |
WATER AS ENERGY ABSORBER TO CONTROL THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF THE STRUCTURES A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI FOR THE Ph.D. (Tech.) Degree in CIVIL ENGINEERING SUBMITTED BY NISHANT KISHORE RAI UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF PROF. G. R. REDDY TEACHER OF MUMBAI UNIVERSITY FOR Ph. D. HEAD, STRUCTURA...
Accelerat ing t he world's research.
WATER AS ENERGY ABSORBER TO CONTROL THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF THE STRUCTURES Nishant Rai
Related papers
Download a PDF Pack of t he best relat ed papers
RE-QUALIFICAT ION OF NON-SEISMICALLY DESIGNED EXIST ING ST RUCT URES T HROUGH T UNE… Nishant Rai
SEISMIC RET ROFIT T ING OF EXIST ING ST RUCT URES BY T UNED SLOSHING WAT ER DAMPER: AN EXPE… Nishant Rai Tuned Liquid Sloshing Wat er Damper: A Robust Device for Seismic Ret rofit t ing Nishant Rai
WATER AS ENERGY ABSORBER TO CONTROL THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF THE STRUCTURES
A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI FOR THE Ph.D. (Tech.) Degree in
CIVIL ENGINEERING
SUBMITTED BY NISHANT KISHORE RAI
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF PROF. G. R. REDDY TEACHER OF MUMBAI UNIVERSITY FOR Ph. D. HEAD, STRUCTURAL AND SEISMIC ENGINEERING SECTION REACTOR SAFETY DIVISION BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE MUMBAI- 400078
June 2013
i
Thesis
| Water as energy absorber to control the seismic response of the structure
Water as Energy Absorber to Control the Seismic Response of the Structures
A Thesis Submitted to the University of Mumbai for the Ph.D. (Tech.) Degree in Civil Engineering Submitted by Nishant Kishore Rai
Under the guidance of Prof. G. R. Reddy Teacher of Mumbai University for Ph. D. Head, Structural and Seismic Engineering Section Reactor Safety Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Mumbai, 400078
June 2013 ii
Thesis
| Water as energy absorber to control the seismic response of the structure
STATEMENT BY THE CANDIDATE As required by the University Ordinance 770, I wish to state that the work embodied in this thesis titled “Water as Energy Absorber to Control the Seismic Response of the Structures” forms my own contribution to the research work carried out under the guidance of Prof. G.R. Reddy at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai. This work has not been submitted for any other degree of this or any other University. Whenever reference has been made to previous works of others, it has been clearly indicated as such and included in the Bibliography.
(Nishant Kishore Rai) Research Student
Certified By
_______________ Prof. G.R. Reddy Research Guide for Ph.D. (Mumbai University) Head, Structural and Seismic Engineering Section Reactor Safety Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai-400085
iii
Thesis
| Water as energy absorber to control the seismic response of the structure
DEDICATION
To my mother in heaven
iv
Thesis
| Water as energy absorber to control the seismic response of the structure
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank my guide, Professor G. R. Reddy, for introducing and guiding me through the fruitful area of seismic retrofitting. Professor G. R. Reddy has allowed me to expand my areas of professional interest far beyond my original intentions and expectations. His continuous encouragement, support and guidance have resulted in the accomplishment of this research in the field of seismic retrofitting of medium height structure with tuned sloshing water dampers. I would like to express my sincere appreciations to my Ph.D. defense committee members, for their valuable time, helpful discussions and useful suggestions. I would like to thank Directorate of Construction Services and Estate management, Department of Atomic Energy as a whole for its support in performing my research work. I would like to thank my all seniors and colleagues for supporting me to pursue this work. Next, I would like to thank Dr. S. J. Patil, a fellow PhD student, for his friendship and tremendous support during the course of this study. Special mention of my gratitude to Mr. N.S. Gabhane, Mr. V. Venkatraj and Mr. P. Aggarwal of DCSEM and Dr. A. P. Tiwari, of BARC, for their encouraging inputs during the tough phases of this study. Many thanks go to my friends Mr. S. K. Bhise and Mr. S. K. Saini at Directorate of Construction Services and Estate management. A special word of thanks goes to Mr. P.N. Dubey of RSD, BARC, for his continuous support and regular hardware inputs in the course of this research. Finally, I would like to extend my profound and deep hearted appreciation and love for my father, wife and children for their much needed, fun punched, support for this research.
Nishant Kishore Rai
v
Thesis
| Water as energy absorber to control the seismic response of the structure
Table of Contents
Title
i
Statutory declarations
ii
Statement by the candidate
iii
Dedication
iv
Acknowledgement
v
Table of contents
vi
List of figures
xi
List of tables
xvii
List of abbreviations
xix
list of symbols
xx
Abstract
xxii
Chapter1
Introduction to Seismic Retrofitting Concepts and Response Control Systems
1 to 26
1.1
Factors governing the engineering of seismic retrofitting
2
1.2
Conventional seismic retrofitting methods
4
1.2.1 Mass reduction
4
1.2.2 Strengthening of existing structural members
4
1.2.3 Addition of structural members
6
1.3
Isolation systems
6
1.4
Supplementary damping systems
9
1.4.1 Passive response control systems
10
1.4.2 Active response control systems
11
1.4.3 Semi-active response control systems
12
1.4.4 Hybrid response control systems
13
1.4.5 Challenges associated with Active, semi-active and hybrid systems Brief description of passive energy dissipating devices
14
1.5.1 Metallic yield dampers
16
1.5.2 Friction dampers
17
1.5.3 Viscoelastic dampers
18
1.5.4 Viscous fluid dampers (VFD)
19
1.5
vi
Thesis
| Water as energy absorber to control the seismic response of the structure
15
1.5.5 Tuned mass dampers
19
1.5.6 Tuned liquid dampers
20
1. 6
24
Organization of the thesis
Chapter 2
Literature Review on Passive Response Control with Tuned Sloshing Water Dampers
2.1
Evolution of tuned liquid dampers
26 to 62
26
2.1.1 Tuned sloshing water damper
27
2.1.2 Tuned liquid column dampers
28
2.1.3 TLCDs and TSWDs installed on civil engineering structures
28
2.2
Theoretical Studies on TSWDs
31
2.2.1 Numerical modelling of tuned sloshing water dampers
31
2.2.2 Equivalent mechanical model (without damping)
36
2.2.3 Equivalent mechanical model with damping
38
2.2.4 Studies on non-linear sloshing
39
2.3
Experimental studies on TSWD
41
2.4
Studies on modified TSWD configurations
43
2.5
Study on TSWDs for supressing vertical excitations
45
2.6
Analogical equivalence between TSWD and TMD
45
2.6.1 Tuned mass dampers: introductory concept
46
Equivalent TMD models of TSWD
48
2.7
2.7.1 Kareem model (1987)
48
2.7.2 Sun Model (1995)
49
2.7.3 Yu model (1999)
51
2.7.4 Yalla model (2001)
54
2.7.5 Tait model (2004)
54
2.7.6 Structure-TSWD interaction
56
2.8
Multiple mass damper concept applied to TSWDs
58
2.8.1 Analytical approach for Multiple TSWDs
60
2.8.2 Mass ratio distribution systems for MTSWDs
62
Chapter 3
Retrofitting of Existing Structure with Tuned Sloshing Water Damper
3.1
State of RC framed Existing structures vii
Thesis
63 to96
| Water as energy absorber to control the seismic response of the structure
63
3.2
65
3.3
Seismic behaviour reinforced concrete frame structures with masonry infill Existing structures for the present study
3.4
Details of Structure
68
67
3.4.1 Damping ratio of ES
69
3.4.2 RC frame details
70
3.4.3 Masonry details
71
3.5
Structural Analysis
73
3.6
Discussion on Analytical Results
74
3.7
Retrofitting Strategy
76
3.8
3.7.1 TSWD system subjected to resonant harmonic frequency vibration
77
3.7.2 Optimal TSWD system subjected to non-resonant harmonic frequency vibration Design of retrofitting system with single frequency TSWD (STSWD) 3.8.1 Design of retrofitting system for mean frequency of 1.48 Hz
78
3.8.2 Design of retrofitting system for frequency of 1.766 Hz (Case 4)
83
3.8.3 Design of retrofitting system for frequency of 1.195 Hz (Case 7)
84
3.8.4 Discussions on design proposals
85
3.9
79 81
Design of retrofitting system with multiple frequency TSWD (MTSWD) Effectiveness ratio of a TSWD retrofitting system
3.10
85 87
3.10.1 Detuning of TSWDS
87
3.11
Effective damping ratio of ES with optimal TSWD subjected to resonant harmonic excitation 3.11.1 Design of TSWD retrofitting system based on BIS:1893 and effectiveness coefficient 3.12 Performance charts for TSWDS
88 89 90
3.12.1 Design of TSWD retrofitting system by effectiveness charts
93
3.12.2 Performance Check of MTSWD retrofitting system
95
Chapter 4
Simulated Experimental Studies with TSWD
97 to135
4.1
Scaled model (SM) of existing structure and TSWD
99
4.2
Similitude requirements of ES and SM
99
4.2.1 Linear scaling
99
4.2.2 Material scaling
100
4.2.3 Scaling of cross sectional area of structural member
100
4.2.4 Mass scaling
101
viii
Thesis
| Water as energy absorber to control the seismic response of the structure
4.2.5 Scaling of dynamic properties
101
4.2.6 Excitation and displacement response scaling
101
4.3
Similitude requirements of TSWD
102
4.4
Similitude requirements of retrofitted ES and SM-TSWD coupling
102
4.5
Scaled model, TSWD and laboratory test setup
102
4.6
Test programme
104
4.7
Free vibration tests
105
4.7.1 Verification and behavioural evaluation of structural model (SM)
105
4.7.2 Optimum parameters of TSWD with respect to SM (size search)
106
4.8
4.9
4.10
Forced vibration tests: Harmonic excitations
109
4.8.1 SM subjected to harmonic base excitations (Bare SM tests)
109
4.8.2 SM coupled with optimal TSWDs subjected to harmonic excitations SM coupled with optimal TSWD subjected to ground motion time histories 4.9.1 SM4-TSWD235x80 coupling
109
4.9.2 SM5-TSWD280x80 coupling
116
4.9.3 SM6-TSWD360x80 coupling
118
SM coupled with multiple frequency TSWDs subjected to dynamic excitations 4.10.1 SM-STSWD and SM-MTSWD couplings subjected to forced vibration 4.10.2 SM4 coupled with STSWD and MTSWD systems
121
4.10.3 SM5 coupled with STSWD and MTSWD systems
125
4.10.4 SM6 coupled with STSWD and MTSWD systems
127
4.11
113 114
122 123
SM and TSWD parameters along axis X
128
4.11.1 Free vibration tests
128
4.11.2 Forced vibration tests
130
4.12
SMs coupled with large size TSWDs
132
4.12.1 SM4-TSWD160 coupling
132
4.12.2 SM5-TSWD160 coupling
133
4.13
Inferences from experimental observations
Chapter 5
Effectiveness of TSWD Retrofitting System for Dynamic Response Reduction
5.1
Testing Protocol ix
Thesis
135 136 to179
136 | Water as energy absorber to control the seismic response of the structure
5.2
Free vibration tests
138
5.2.1
First mode frequencies of SMs
138
5.2.2
Determination of optimum TSWD parameters (size search)
140
Forced vibration tests: Harmonic excitations
144
5.3.1
Bare SM subjected to resonant harmonic
144
5.3.2
144
5.4
Optimised SM-TSWD couplings subjected to resonant frequency harmonic excitations Forced vibration tests: Broad band earthquake excitations
5.5
Multiple frequency TSWD (MTSWD) system
150
5.5.1
Test protocol
151
5.5.2
SMs subjected to dynamic excitations in coupling with STSWD and MTSWD systems TSWD parameters along axis X
152
5.6.1
Size search with respect to SM
154
5.6.2
Forced vibration tests
154
Test with large size TSWDs
155
5.7.1
Size search
155
5.7.2
Forced vibration test
156
5.8
Inferences from experimental observations
157
5.9
161
5.9.3
Design of TSWD retrofitting system based on experimental investigations Designing the MTSWD system for desired response reduction of SM Designing the MTSWD system for desired response reduction of ES Execution scheme
5.9.4
Discussion on design of TSWD retrofitting system
177
5.9.5
Retrofitting design methodology with TSWD systems
177
5.3
5.6
5.7
5.9.1 5.9.2
148
154
162 174 175
Chapter 6
Conclusions
180 to187
6.1
Summary
180
6.2
Significant inferences from the study
182
6.3
Recommendations Future Research
186
Bibliography
188 to199
Synopsis
200 to229
Visible Research Output
x
Thesis
| Water as energy absorber to control the seismic response of the structure
230
List of Figures Figure 1.1
Response spectrum from BIS 1893-2002
2
Figure 1.2
Effect of damping ratio on structural response (for concrete structures)
3
Figure 1.3
Engineering process of retrofit decision making
3
Figure 1.4
Retrofitting by jacketing of columns and beams
5
Figure 1.5
Retrofitting by carbon fibre wrapping of columns and beams
5
Figure 1.6
6
Figure 1.7
Effect of addition of structural members on the lateral load carrying capacity of the structures Reduced response due to frequency shift through base isolation
Figure 1.8
Commonly used base isolation devices
7
Figure 1.9
Friction pendulum base isolation system
8
Figure 1.10
Fixed base and base isolated subjected to actual earthquakes Guwahati
9
Figure 1.11
Seismic energy absorption in conventional structure
10
Figure 1.12
Structure with passive energy dissipating (PED) device
10
Figure 1.13
Structure with active control system
11
Figure 1.14
Structure with semi-active control systems
12
Figure 1.15
Structure with hybrid control system
13
Figure 1.16
Hybrid control with Duox system
14
Figure 1.17
Metallic yield dampers
16
Figure 1.18
Lead extrusion dampers
17
Figure 1.19
Pal friction damper configuration and execution
18
Figure 1.20
Viscoelastic damper
18
Figure 1.21
Viscous fluid damper
19
Figure 1.22
Taipai 101 with tuned mass damper
20
Figure 1.23
Tuned liquid damper family
21
Figure 1.24
Tuned sloshing water damper on top of the building
21
Figure 1.25
Schematic of a TLCD on a single degree of freedom system
22
Figure 2.1
Interconnected tanks as rolling stabiliser in marine applications
26
Figure 2.2
Buildings / structures with Tuned Liquid Damper installations
29
Figure 2.3
Buildings/ structures with Tuned Liquid Damper installations
30
Figure 2.4
Fundamental anti-symmetric wave (sloshing) in a moving tank
32
xi
Thesis
| Water as energy absorber to control the seismic response of the structure
7
Figure 2.5
Equivalent mechanical models of sloshing
32
Figure 2.6
Coordinate system for the derivation of basic slosh equation
33
Figure 2.7
Definition sketches of slosh wave motion and shapes for a rectangular tank
34
Figure 2.8
Equivalent mechanical models for liquid sloshing in rectangular tank
36
Figure 2.9
Mechanical model of liquid sloshing in rectangular tank with damping