Week 3 - Belbin Team Activity PDF

Preview

Summary

Belbin Team Activity...

Description

MPO 21129 – Week 3 Tutorial Activity Pre-tutorial Task: Belbin’s (2004) team role theory suggests that groupthink can be avoided, and team effectiveness enhanced, by assuring that various specific roles are accounted for within a team. Click the link below to take an assessment based upon Belbin’s Team Role theory. What are your top three roles that you can contribute to an effective team: https://www.123test.com/team-roles-test/

Innovator Chairperson Analyst Driver Explorer Executive Completer

8%

11%

19%

8%

11%

11%

11%

11%

8%

11%

14%

17%

14%

17%

14%

6%

6%

11% 14%

14% 17% 11% 8% 8% 11%

0%

11% 8%

17%

17%

11%

11%

19%

11%

17%

8%

6%

17%

8%

3%

6%

6%

Surplus

11%

Void

14%

SibreeName: Nicholas

darakasName: Dimitri

Expert

ggaName: Vincent Adi

Team player

8%

Name: Jonathan n

Role

Name: Jack Conroy

Tutorial Task: With your tutorial group, complete the following table to analyse what role strengths, excesses and voids exist within your team (indicate the top 3-5 strengths per member). A team role surplus exists when half or more members of the team have a role as their first, second or third team role. A team role void exists when no members of the team have this role as their first, second or third role. Surpluses and voids create risks for the effectiveness of the group. Indicate the Surpluses and Voids in your group’s profile by writing an S or a V in the far right hand column of the table below.

Too many voids or surpluses in a team can limit team effectiveness. Based on the table below, and your analysis of the surpluses and voids in your team, what might be some of the limitations of your tutorial group? What are some ground-rules you might create to avoid the pitfalls inherent in the make-up of your team? Role

Belbin Name

Team player

Teamworker

Expert

Specialist

Innovator

Plant

Chairperson

Analyst

Coordinator

Resource Investigator

Driver

Shaper

Explorer

Implementer

Executive

Monitor Evaluator

Completer

Completer Finisher

Strength Weakness Cooperative, mild, Indecisive in difficult diplomatic, listens, averts situations friction Focused, self-starting, Dwells on technicalities, provides knowledge skills Narrow contribution Creative, imaginative, Ignores incidentals, problem solver poor communication Mature, confident, Can be viewed as clarifies goals, manipulative, offloads communicates well personal work Extrovert, enthusiastic, Over optimistic, loses communicative, interest once project is networking initiated Challenging, dynamic, Prone to provocation, thrives on pressure, offends others courage Disciplined, reliable, Inflexible, slow to adapt efficient Sober, energetic, Lacks drive, lacks ability discerning to inspire Conscientious, anxious, Undue worry, unwilling delivers on time to delegate...