Wes Hayden and Edmund Exley find it impossible to create their own destiny in life PDF

Preview

Summary

Wes Hayden and Edmund Exley find it impossible to create their own destiny in life...

Description

Wes Hayden and Edmund Exley find it impossible to create their own destiny in life. To what extent is this true in Montana 1948 and LA Confidential? Both in Montana 1948 written by Larry Watson and LA Confidential directed by Curtis Hanson, explore the struggle each of their characters faces in trying to lay down the path to a future they want, due to their environment around them and their current circumstances holding them back. The characters of both the novel and the book are apprehended by the people of their time. Similarly, the ideals and antiquated views of their time hold them back and limit them to walk their own path. Another thing holding them back is the reputation and idea the public have of their personal and professional lives, not allowing them to create their own destiny. In both the novel and the film, characters can be seen following a path that has been welltrodden before, and the characters and prevented from laying their own and unique path down by the people around them. This can be seen clearly in the book as well as in the film. This notion is specially brought to light in the book when Wesley tries to take proper legal action against his brother’s transgressions, and he is held back by his father, who looks at the job of a sheriff to be a person who “know[s] when to look and when to look away.” This notion of corruption being forced upon a person who wants to do good and do his job the right way is further explored in the movie, where corruption is the go-to and when Ed Exley tries to do his job the right lawful way he is told to not “start trying to do the right thing, boy. You haven't the practice,” forcing him to finally give up his dream to achieve justice lawfully and be made to achieve justice the corrupt way. Or else leaving the killer of his father free without facing any consequences for his actions. On the contrary, the transgressors and the voice of justice of both the novel and the film are not given what they deserved. Dudley Smith of LA Confidential is killed by Ed Exley who wants “to catch the guys who thought they could get away with it,” but is forced to take action the corrupt and unruly way knowing well that if he attempts at doing it the proper way, Smith a higher ranking officer in the police department will get off easily and in the end due to Ed Exley’s circumstances and the people pressuring him, his idea of it being “supposed to be about justice [is lost] somewhere along the way.” Analogously, in the novel, Frank Hayden escapes from his consequences when he decides to take his own life to escape from facing his punishment and the shame and humiliation that comes with it. Even though Wesley believes “sins—crimes—are not supposed to go unpunished,” he still does not take proper full legal action he would have done if it was a stranger who committed the same crime, he chooses to do this in an attempt to save his brother and his family reputation from being trashed and in the end he is forced to leave as the person who did wrong. Likewise in the film Ed Exley is left as a hero, both not deserving of what they got in the end....