Title | Anthro 105 |
---|---|
Course | Principles Of Biological Anthropology |
Institution | University of Wisconsin-Madison |
Pages | 7 |
File Size | 129.4 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 15 |
Total Views | 161 |
Principles Of Biological Anthropology...
Timeline stuff First primates Plesiadapiforms : PRO-PRIMATES o Capolestes 58 mya Primate like bc grasping hands and feet + nails on big toe Angiosperm hypothesis Eocene Euprimates: 34-56 mya → EU primates TRU primates Had characteristics of primates: grasping hands and feet, generalized dentition, enhanced vision, big brains Two types: Adapids and Omomyids Adapids → strepsirhines = ancestor Lemur like → olfaction Omomyids → haplorhines = ancestor Tarsier like → vision First haplorhine = archicebus (55 mya) First Anthropoid Eosimias-- 42 mya China , monkey like teeth and heel Types of Oligocene Anthropoids 29-37 mya Parapithecids NW monkeys (2-1-3-3) Postorbital closure Arboreal Fruit and insect diet Size of a squirrel monkey Oligopithecids Similar to parapithecids OW monkey (2-1-2-3) SEXUAL DIMORPHISM Propliopithecids OW dentition SEXUAL dimorphism Aegyptopithecus 30 mya OW monkey like, not very ape like Oligocene = OW monkey diversity Miocene = first apes? APES Y-5 molars Bigger brain Fruit eating teeth Uneven limb length No tail TYPES OF APES 17-22 mya Proconsulids (african) 17-22 mya Varied in size, ecological niche All diurnal Sexually dimorphic, small brained Monkey/ ape like No tail Dryopithecid (european) 9-17 mya Y-5 teeth (like proconsulid)
Larger brains First “full ape” Extincition due to miocene cooling Sivapithecids 8-12 mya Proconsulid/monkey like body and locomotion Thick molar enamel Orangutan shape skull Other african ape ancestors Chororapithecus 6-10 mya Most recent: Oreopithecus 9 mya Hominins 8-10 mya Sahelanthropus ~6 mya (had 1 and a bit/ 7) Hominin like: bipedal Ape like: skull shape and brain (~350 cc) Transition: small(ish) non-honing (ish) canines o Orrorin (6 mya) – Africa (Orrorin means “original man”) Hominin-like Bipedal (some) Smaller teeth than apes Thicker enamel Ape-like Arboreal arms (tree climbing – main) Honing canines Ardipithecus 4-6 mya Kadabba Arboreal: arm and hand bones Bipedal: broad, robust, bipedal toes Ramidus -- (had 1 and 2/7) Arboreal: grasping hands and feet, long curved fingers Bipedal: short and stout ilium, femur at bicondylar angle Teeth: hominin diet-- small canines, non honing, apical wearing, thick enamel Ape like: tree climber, brain size Hominin like: bipedal, diet and dentition Early Australopithecines 2-4 mya Anamensis (2/7) Bipedal: weight bearing Dentition: non-honing, apical wearing, U shaped, huge molars, thick enamel Woodland ecological niche Afarensis 3-3.6 mya (2/7) Lucy (3.2 mya) and Dikika Child (3.3 mya) Dikka = hyoid bone Bipedal Longer arms than legs (gorilla like shoulder) Upper limbs = arboreal Skull: ape like Broad skull/cranial base Prognathic face Dentition: hominin like Parabolic
Megadontia Smaller canines Less sexually dimorphic canines Sexual dimorphic: males larger Earliest stone tools ever found Late Australopithecines (2-3 mya) Garhi 2.5 mya (3/7) Ape like cranial skeleton (prognathic face, sagittal crest) Australopithecine-like large premolars and molars, broad canines Human like legs (first time legs longer than arms) Oldowan stone tools: hammerstones, flakes, cores Aethiopicus 2.5 mya Ethiopia and kenya Robust cranial features Brain size = 410 cc Boisei 1.2-2.3 mya Robust 510 cc brain Africanus 2-3 mya Gracile Large premolars and molars Sexual dimorphism Robustus 1.5-2 mya ROBUST Sagittal crest Wide zygomatic arches Extreme megadontia 460 cc brain Sediba 2 mya Mosaic of traits Transitioning towards homo Homo like: pelvis, hands (extensive tool use→ doesnt require big brains), small teeth, gracile Ape like: long arms, small brain (420 cc) Arrival of homo Habilis 1.8-2.5 mya Handy man (5/7, limited speech tho) Bigger brain, better tools, smaller face, smaller teeth, tool use Australopithecine like body Brain 775 cc Erectus 0.3-1.8 mya (67) Global species Walked like us 5-6 ft Used fire Large brow ridge: chewing not grinding Variability with skull, brain size, brow ridge TAKE AWAYS: Globalization and similarities & diversity China: Peking man
Indonesia: Java Europe: gran dolina Five main traits between habilis and erectus Human postcranial skeleton Even bigger brain (650-1000 cc) More sophisticated tool use Hunting and fire use Large brow ridge Hunter gatherers 1.8 mya Homo sapiens 0.5 mya (7/7) Early/archaic 500,000 ya Homo-erectus like Similarities: football shaped skull, large brow ridge, large face, sunken chin Differences: from 1000-1400 cc (brain), smaller teeth, increased material culture Homo heidelbergensis 0.5 mya Erectus like: large brow ridge, sunken chin Sapien like: large brain, flat face Neandertal like: wide and short bodies (cold adapted) Archaic Homo sapien (in africa) Brow ridge, but modern human brain size Modern humans in africa 160,000 ya Neandertals 30,000-100,000 ya Cold adapted Modern humans Mosaic of traits Differences between archaic Basketball brain, big forehead, reduced brow ridge, small face, projecting chin, gracile postcranial skeleton Gradual loss of robusticity Modern human v. neandertal Differences:
Modern
Neandertal
Basketball
football
Small brow ridge
Large brow ridge
Large forehead
Small forehead
Prominent chin
Sunken chin Cold adapted
Neanderthal extinction o Competition hypothesis
o Interbreeding hypothesis Modern humans globally 50,000 ya Australian migration 40,000 ya
Concept stuff: Why did primates emerge? 3 hypotheses Arboreal: adaptions to life in trees Angiosperm: fruit eating in the trees Visual predation: hunting in the trees Seven big steps 1. Bipedalism 6 mya → sahelanthropus 2. Non-honing canines 5.5 mya → ardipithecus 3. Making tools 2.5 mya → A. garhi 4. Speech 2.5 mya → Homo habilis 5. Big brains 2.5 mya → homo habilis 6. Cooperative hunting 1 mya → homo erectus 7. Agriculture 10,000 ya → homo sapien Why did we evolve? Patchy forest hypothesis o Early hominins lived in patchy forests Provisioning hypothesis → WRONG BITCH o Rearing offspring is energetically expensive o Humans are good at it o Hominins were forming LTRs (long term relationhipzzz) o Males provided for females Mousterian tools (40,000 - 60,000 ya) The levallois technique Hand axes and spears Used by archaic and modern humans Carrying food Bipedal anatomy Bipedal anatomy o Pelvis Quadrupeds Tall and thin ilium Ilium directly toward back Bipeds Short and stout ilium Ilium flattened and rotated to side Bowl shape Skull Foramen magnum position Spine C-shaped in quadrupeds Femur: length and long neck Knee: bicondylar angle Foot: toes and arch Tool making timeline Homo habilis 1.8-2.5 mya → first discovery of tools Australopithecus afarensis 3.5 mya → first tool USE with skeletal remains
Australopithecus garhi 2.5 mya → first tool MAKING with skeletal remains Scavenging versus hunting Evidence o Scavenging: tools over tooth (hominin there second) o Hunting: tooth over tools (hominin there first) o There is evidence for both, but hunting could be more opportunistic Scavenging support o Too small o No weapons o Small brains (relatively) o Bone types (not prime) o Bone marrow o Sequence of cut marks Tools Mousterian: 40,000-600,000 ya o WHO? Archaic modern humans and neandertals o WHAT? Hand axes and spears Middle stone age tools: 40,000-250,000 ya o WHO? Archaic modern humans and modern humans o WHAT? Blade technology, throwing sticks and spears, heat-treated stone o THERE’S MORE??? Engravings (material culture with modern humans) Hunter gatherer society Men: hunt → boom or bust, produce most during middle age Women: gather (some hunting) → stable, produce most post-menopause Long juvenile period Reduced sexual dimorphism → MONOGAMY! o Competition via male provisioning as opposed to direct male-male aggression Agriculture- 10,000 ya The systematic domestication of plants and animals as primary food sources Why this time? → emergence out of last ice, warmer and more stable climate Fertile crescent o Food: wheat, barley, lentils, chickpeas, etc o Animals: who had good yield and who had good temperment (goats, sheep, pigs, cattle) Natufians→ first famers o Transitioned towards more sedentary lifestyle (settlements of ~300 people) Catalhoyuk = first TOWN o Ate wheat, barley, chickpeas, lentils o Domesticated sheep and goats o Cooked using pottery o Hunted wild deet, boar, cattle, fish o Disease = big problem o Overcrowding = big problem More competitive Warfare Medical care? Witch-craft? Pros and cons
Pros: stable food supply, more energy, more offspring (also a negative) Cons: lead to malnutrition, stunted growth, susceptible to pathogen, a more sedentary lifestyle (thinner and weaker bones), tooth decay and other dental defects...