Title | Basic Forensic Methods: Ch. 1 |
---|---|
Course | Basic Forensic Methods |
Institution | University of Akron |
Pages | 4 |
File Size | 81.3 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 52 |
Total Views | 157 |
Download Basic Forensic Methods: Ch. 1 PDF
Practical Crime Scene Processing and Investigation Crime Scene Processing ● Crime scene processing is an inherent task and duty associated with nearly every investigation ● Few, if any, crimes are without some form of a “scene” ● Processing consists of the examination and evaluation of the scene and any evidence found there for the express purpose of documenting the scene context and recovering evidence ● There is no one right way to process a crime scene ○ each scene is unique and each scene has its own challenges ○ there are, however, basic key ingredients that make up a good processing methodology ● Key processing ingredients: ○ knowledge: a basic understanding by the crime scene technician of what they are trying to accomplish and why ○ skills and tools: the technician must have the appropriate equipment and be skilled with it in order to collect the various types of evidence they may encounter ○ methodical approach: the methods employed by the technician must be all encompassing and purposefully regular ○ flexibility: although methodical, the technician must also be flexible in order to deal with unique situations ○ coordinated effort: the entire team must coordinate their effort so everyone is pursuing the same goal Evidence ● There are two basic forms of evidence: ○ testimonial evidence: admissions, confessions, statements by parties involved in the investigation ○ physical evidence: items and the condition of objects that are collected and/or documented ■ physical evidence will never lie
● we can misinterpret or be misled by it, but that is a human factor unassociated to the evidence itself ■ the consideration of physical evidence provides a factual framework that is, for the most part, irrefutable by anyone ● it provides objective information which will corroborate or refute testimonial evidence and investigative theories ■ having the pieces of the puzzle means little until we can put them back in order ● “The interpretive value of evidence is a function of time and the items surroundings” Context ● By evaluating the context of evidence, we may be able to put the pieces in order and gain an understanding of how they came to be there ○ The goal of crime scene investigation is understanding the evidence, not simply collecting it ● Five ways context manifests itself: ○ 1) predictable effects ■ provides information as to the time of the incident based solely on the evidence itself ■ examples: insect activity at a death scene, rigor mortis, livor mortis ○ 2) unpredictable effects ■ changes that occur in unexpected or random ways ■ examples: actions of EMS or L.E. (opening doors, turning on lights, etc.), movement of evidence ○ 3) transitory effects ■ these are temporary things and tend to disappear quickly ■ examples: ice in a glass, heat from a cigarette, smells, wet shoe prints ○ 4) relational details ■ ability to physically place items in the scene ■ helps define a correlation between objects ■ crime scene sketches and the measurements help preserve this type of information
■ examples: a void pattern on wall surrounded by blood spatter, presence of a weapon near the victim ○ 5) functional details ■ operating condition of items in the scene ■ examples: the operability of a firearm, the lock on a door, an alarm set on the clock for a specific time Crime Scene Integrity ● There are three basic threats the crime scene technician must recognize: ○ addition of material to the scene ■ the investigators and others end up creating evidence that didn’t exist ■ examples: shoe prints, fingerprints, fibers and hairs, cigarette butts, pop cans, coffee cups ○ destruction of material ■ the investigators and others end up destroying evidence or damaging its value ■ examples: trampled out dust prints in avenues of approach, bloodstains on the victim’s clothing, trampled dew trails in outdoor scenes, loss of evidence on the perimeter of the scene, loss of hairs and fibers on the body ○ movement of material ■ investigators and others end up moving material in the scene changing its context ■ examples: weapons moved away from suicide victims, lights turned on or doors and windows opened, staging actions by relatives (e.g., suicides or auto-erotic deaths) Investigative Ethics ● The function of an investigation is to discover the truth ○ there is no other agenda ● Personal agenda and personal involvement will warp the investigator’s perspective ○ the investigator must remain a neutral and impartial professional
● To remain neutral and impartial, the investigator must: ○ investigate completely and thoroughly ○ consider and report all evidence, including exculpatory information ○ consider all viable hypotheses to explain the evidence ○ not be swayed by any lawyer...