Case Study 2.2 - Film Prioritization PDF

Title Case Study 2.2 - Film Prioritization
Course Public Finance
Institution Red River College
Pages 4
File Size 300.3 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 62
Total Views 159

Summary

Download Case Study 2.2 - Film Prioritization PDF


Description

NAME:__REGINA ARROZA____

MGMT3007–Pr oj ectManagement FI LM PRI ORI TI ZATI ON Chapt er1& 2CaseSt udy I nt hi sassi gnmentyouwi l lber equi r edt ocar ef ul l yr eadt hecas est udyi nf or mat i on ont ext bookpages61t o65( 8th ed. ) .Ther ei si nf or mat i oncr i t i calt oyourdeci si on maki ngpr oces s.Youmustal somakesomesubj ect i vedeci si onbasedonyour j udgementasapr oj ectmanager .

INSTRUCTIONS AND POLICIES:   

This is an individual assignment due on Wednesday, September 16, 2020 Project will be completed and submitted to dropbox The template used to complete this project is included in this assignment document.

GRADING AND EVALUATION:  

assignment is worth 5% of your final grade. Assignment marked out of 20 points

Marking criteria; o undertaken the weighted selection process correctly choosing the selection criteria, weighting the selection criteria and then calculating the scores properly using the matrix provided. (10 pts.) o demonstrated an understanding of “want” and “must have” criteria (5 pts.) o prioritized the projects based on their weighted model and selection criteria. (5 pts,) Dropbox submissions will include; o List of all potential projects, where they ranked in priority order, and a rationale for the decision. o Identification of Projects which do not meet “Must” objectives and / or “Want” objectives o Completed Project priority Evaluation form ( template below ) Completed word document will be submitted to drop box for marking.

Project Management

1

NAME:__REGINA ARROZA____ Must meet if impacts

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Y = yes N = no N/A = not applicable Y = yes N = no N/A = not applicable Y = yes N = no N/A = not applicable Relative Single project importance impact 1-100 definitions 70 0 = No potential 1 = Low 2 = High 60 0 = No potential 1 = Low 2 = High 10 0 = No potential 1 = Low 2 = High 55 0 = No potential 1 = Low 2 = High 70 0 < 18% 1 = 18-22% 2 = 22% and up 40 0 = No impact 1 = Some Impact 2 = Great impact 10 0 = No potential 1 = Low 2 = High

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Must objectives Meets all safety and environmental standards PG or G rating No adverse effects on other operations

Want objectives Win best picture of the year Win best animated feature film Generate additional merchandise Raise environmental concerns Generate profit greater than 18% Advance state of film animation

Provide bias for new theme ride

Total weighted score Priority Ranking Reasons for rankings: Project Management

2

Weighted score 70

140

-

140

70

140

70

120

0

-

60

0

60

0

0

20

-

20

10

20

60

0

0

-

110

0

110

110

70

70

-

140

70

70

70

0

40

-

80

0

80

0

0

0

-

20

20

10

10

260

270

-

570

170

490

320

5

4

-

1

6

2

3

NAME:__REGINA ARROZA____ Project 1: My Life with Dalai Lama Win Best Picture of the Year Win Best Animated Feature Film Generate additional merchandise

Focused on Lama’s life, who is a religious figure in Buddhism An animated film, animations of the animals could be realistic Religious figures cannot be used for merchandise (unless for religious purposes) Film is not focusing on any environmental concerns 8 x 0.8 + 18 x 0.5 + 24 x 0.2 = 35.64% High reputation of the religious figure is justifiable Religious figure cannot be used for entertainment purposes

Raise environmental concerns Generate profit greater than 18% Advance state of film animation Provide basis for new theme ride Project 2: Heidi Win Best Picture of the Year

Breathtaking scenery of the film, and has a big budget that will determine quality of work It is not an animated film Original soundtracks of the film would be sold digitally and on stores (CDs and Blu-ray) Does not focus on any environmental concerns 2 x 0.8 + 20 x 0.5 + 20 x 0.2 = 18.8% Top-name stars are featured in film, which will create reputation No potential since film is only about a character’s life

Win Best Animated Feature Film Generate additional merchandise Raise environmental concerns Generate profit greater than 18% Advance state of film animation Provide basis for new theme ride

**Project 3 DID NOT meet two of the MUST objectives (meets all safety and environmental standards and PG/G Rating) due to illegal contents and illicit activities of the film

Project 3: The Year of the Echo

Project 4: Escape from Rio Japuni Win Best Picture of the Year

Film will be set in Amazon rainforest, a place with breathtaking sceneries An animated film, animation would be realistic Would potentially generate into kids’ toys (stuffed toys, figurines, etc.) Raises concerns of the local clear cutting that happens in the jungle 15 x 0.8 + 20 x 0.5 + 24 x 0.2 = 26.8% Animation would be a great basis for future films Potential theme rides in a park for children and adults to experience and enjoy (ex. Disneyland)

Win Best Animated Feature Film Generate additional merchandise Raise environmental concerns Generate profit greater than 18% Advance state of film animation Provide basis for new theme ride

Project Management

3

NAME:__REGINA ARROZA____ Project 5: Nadia! Win Best Picture of the Year

An old story about a Gymnast; could potentially not reach as many viewers It is not an animated film Merchandise would only be limited to CDs and Blu-ray Does not raise any concern to the environment because it is a bibliography 8 x 0.8 + 15 x 0.5 + 20 x 0.2 = 17.9% Low-budget film; not high quality in film animation Theme park could include gymnastic activities for children and adults alike

Win Best Animated Feature Film Generate additional merchandise Raise environmental concerns Generate profit greater than 18% Advance state of film animation Provide basis for new theme ride

Project 6: Keiko – One Whale of a Story Win Best Picture of the Year

Picturesque sceneries of the ocean life that caters to children and adults Integration of realistic animated environment would be a great concept Would potentially generate into kids’ toys (stuffed toys, figurines, etc.) Film will expose marine life and will raise the conservation and love for whales 6 x 0.8 + 18 x 0.5 + 25 x 0.2 = 18.8% Big-budget film that will use technology advances Already has other competition; could have a theme for aquariums and public pools

Win Best Animated Feature Film Generate additional merchandise Raise environmental concerns Generate profit greater than 18% Advance state of film animation Provide basis for new theme ride

Project 7: Grand Island Win Best Picture of the Year

Depicts mostly the “ugly” side of humanity waste, but result could be breathtaking Not an animated film Could potentially sell merchandise that promotes environment conservation (ex. Gardening tools, fertilizers, etc.) Raises a huge concern for toxic wastes that gets dumped in the local ecosystem 9 x 0.8 + 15 x 0.5 + 20 x 0.2 = 18.7% No advancements for film animation Potential rides for a themed “Grand Island” river

Win Best Animated Feature Film Generate additional merchandise

Raise environmental concerns Generate profit greater than 18% Advance state of film animation Provide basis for new theme ride

Project Management

4...


Similar Free PDFs