HLT 362 v Exercise 24 Answers-All correct 1 PDF

Preview

Summary

WGU...

Description

HLT 362v TRAINING 24 Inquiries to be Rated 1 . Precisely what is the 3rd there’s r value mentioned for the partnership between parameters 4 and 9? The listed 3rd there’s r value is normally –0. thirty-two. 2 . Summarize the relationship r sama dengan -0. 32** using sayings. Is this a statistically significant correlation? Produce a rationale to your answer. The correlation agent -0. thirty-two shows a bad relationship regarding the variables. For the reason that the s value because of this correlation agent is less than zero. 01 hence the correlation is normally significant by both zero. 05 and 0. 01 significance level. 3. Analyze the percentage of variance discussed for 3rd there’s r = zero. 53. Is correlation clinically important? Offer a rationale for your answer. The explained change is = r2 = 0. 532 = 0. 2809 or 28. 09%. As the correlation is definitely moderate thus we cannot say anything about whether the correlation is clinically important or not. The importance depends on the sample size. Cheaper sample size means it may not be important higher sample size means it might be. four. According to Table two, r = 0. 15 is listed seeing that the correlation between which two items? Identify this romantic relationship. What is the effect size just for this relationship, and what size sample will be needed to find this romance in future research? The value 3rd there’s r = zero. 15 shows up as the correlation among variables third and six. The relationship is confident implies a good relationship even so low benefit indicates low relationship. some. Calculate the proportion of difference explained with r sama dengan 0. 12-15. Describe the clinical need for this romance. The discussed variace is normally = r2 = zero. 152 sama dengan 0. 0225 or installment payments on your 25%. Seeing that the relationship is really low so we are able to say the marriage is not really stronger and may be minor. 6. The pair variables in Table two, have the poorest correlation, or perhaps r worth? Which marriage is the nearest to this ur value? Supply a rationale to your answer. The correlation among variable six and several is -0. 02 i actually. e. the value of r can be 0. 02 which is the best and thus here is the weakest relationship. And the ur between varying 4 and 7 is definitely the nearest for this weakest relationship. 7. Is definitely the correlation among LOT-R Total scores and Avoidance-Distraction dealing style statistically significant? Is relationship strongly related practice? Provide rationale for your answer. The correlation between these two variables is –0. 20* and the single * implies that the correlation is significant at 0. 05 significance level. As the correlation is significant so this is relevant to study. 8. Is the correlation between variables 9 and 4 significant? Is this correlation relevant to practice? Provide a rationale for your answer. The required correlation between these two variables is –0. 32** and the double * implies that the correlation is significant at both 0. 05 and 0. 01 significance level. As the correlation is significant so this relationship is relevant to study. 9. Consider two values, r = 0. 08 and r = -0. 58. Describe them in relationship to each other. Describe the clinical importance of both ur values. In this article the 1st ur is demonstrating a positive marriage and the subsequent one is demonstrating a negative marriage. The value for the purpose of 1st ur is really little thus a weak relationship is present how-

ever for 2nd the value shows a moderate correlation and as the absolute value for 2nd r is higher so it shows a stronger correlation. 10. Examine the Pearson r values for LOT-R Total, which measured Optimism with the Task and Emotion Coping Styles. What do these results indicate? How might you use this information in your practice? The required correlation with task is 0. 54** and with emotion is –0. 58**. Both the values show a significant correlation and the correlation is moderate. However the sign suggests the relationship with task is positive but for emotion is negative. BONUS QUESTION One of the study goals was to analyze the relationship between optimism and Using the data in Table 2, formulate an opinion regarding the overall correlation between optimism and psychopathology. Provide a rationale for your answer. The correlation optimism and psychopathology is significant at 0. 01 level and the relationship is negative. That may be clear via both the relationship coefficient worth and the marriage with other factors. For all the factors where the relationship is great with confidence it is poor with psychopathology and the other way round and hence we can definitely say a negative and strong correlation is present between these two variables....