Title | Math IA - curve of a flight math |
---|---|
Course | Mathematics - A2 |
Institution | Sixth Form (UK) |
Pages | 14 |
File Size | 428.6 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 7 |
Total Views | 163 |
Math IA - curve of a flight math...
Introduction: Since my dad was an expatriate when I was young, we would have to fly long-haul internationalflights frequently, and everytimebefore takeoff I would stare at the map and wonder why the planes fly in the route they do and specifically why the paths are curved and not straight.Therefore my aim for this exploration is to find the distance and time of the shortest flight path from NewYork to Manila in addition to investigating whether it is better to fly East or West from New York. By learning about spherical trigonometry and great circles on my own since it is beyond this course, I will use different formulas and spherical triangles to find the distance between two destinations. From this new found information, since I may want to go to college in the East Coast, this could impact which flight I would pick, whether I would fly over the West Coast and back over the Pacific Ocean, or fly over the Atlantic Ocean and Europe. In order to investigate the fastest and shortest flight distance from New York to Manila, I used two different methods. Firstly, I used the latitudes and longitudes of these two cities to find the central angle formed between these two cities if drawn to the core of the Earth. From this, the length of the great circle path the flight takes can be determined and the approximate time as well. The second method I will use is by drawing spherical triangles on the lenart sphere. By constructing a triangle that goes through the two cities, the angles of the triangle can be found. Through the spherical law of cosines, these angles can beused in order to determine the angle formedagain at the core of the Earth. The second aim I will be investigating using the first method mentioned above, is which flight path from NewYork to Manila that exists in reality has the fastest travel time. Since there are no direct flights to Manila, I will be investigating one with a stopover in Vancouver and one with a stopover in Hong Kong. Since these two are different distances, this could possibly affect the flight times as one of the stopovers is approximately in the middle of the journey from New Yorkto Manilawhereas the other stopover is significantly closer to Manila. This could possibly affect the outcome as the Philippine Airlines flight has two legs more similar in length while the Cathay Pacific flight has one long leg and one short leg. Through this exploration, I hope to learn about flight paths and the great circles that they fly in, in addition to being able to determine whether it is better to fly heading West, or fly heading East. 1
Optimum Flight Path Method 1: In order to find the optimum flight path from New York to Manila, spherical geometry needs to be used. Spherical geometry is commonly used for navigation since spherical geometry is thegeometry of two-dimensional surfaces on a sphere. Therefore, in order to findtheoptimum flight path, the great circle connecting these two points needs to be found since flying along a great circle is the shortest distance between two points on a sphere. During this exploration, I learned about great circles and spherical geometry on my own since this was necessary for what I wanted to do but is not taught in the course. I read about spherical geometry on various websites in addition to using the Lenárt Sphere to teach myself about this new type of trigonometry. The Lenárt Sphere is a tool used to learn spherical geometry through hands on experimenting with spherical surfaces. With the Lenárt sphere you can accurately measure and draw shapes on a spherical surface using it for different applications of spherical geometry. The Lenárt Sphere is used below in my second method for finding the optimum flight path. For this first method, by finding the central angle at the core of the Earth between two points, the arc length of the flight path on the great circle can be found through the formula shown below using the longitudes and latitudes of the different cities. Figure 1: Diagram Showing Center Angle
2
I constructed the diagram on the previous page on Google Earth to help visualize how I am going to find this flightpath.Ilearnedhow to use Google Earth and how to plot points accurately in order toobtainanaccurate representation of the places the flight path passes through. By using the path tool, I connected the two coordinates of New York and Manila to show the great circle path a pilot would take to fly between these two points. Then by picking a third point and connecting paths between this third point a spherical triangle can be formed. From this, I learned that the optimum flight path from New York to ManilawouldpassthroughtheArctic and eastern Russia which is contrary to what one might think by looking at a map. By finding the center angle in the middle of the Earth, Angle O as shown in the diagram above, since arc length AB is the arc across from this angle, the formula that relates the arc length of a circle to the center angle can be used. The diagram below shows how a pyramid is constructed and the angle in the center of the Earth is used to find the arc length or great circle distance. Figure 2: Diagram Showing Center Angle in a Sphere
1
I will be using the equation below to find the angle made in the center of the Earth between New York andManilaif a spherical triangle is drawn between the three points as shown in Figure 1. The equation is derived from the haversine formula which is an important equation used innavigation, giving great circle distances between two points on a sphere using their longitudes and latitudes. By substituting the latitudes and longitudes as shown below into the equation, the center angle can be found to later on be used to find the distance on a great circle between New York and Manila. 1
Spherical Triangle. Digital image. Spherical Triangle. WolframMathWorld, n.d. Web. 8 Apr. 2016.
3
When attempting to usethisequation, I wondered how this equation came about so I decided to attempt to derive it. In order to derive this equation, we first start with the Haversine Formula where for any two points on a sphere the central angle between them is given through: 2 hav ( rd ) = hav (ϕ2 − ϕ1 ) + cos (ϕ1 ) cos (ϕ2 ) hav (λ2 − λ1 )
Where hav is the haversine function and θ = rd
hav (Θ) = sin2 ( Θ2 ) = 1−cos(θ) 2
sin2 ( Θ2 ) =
1−cos(θ) 2
due to the trigonometric identites of double angles.
On the left side of the equation,
( dr ) is the central angle in the Earth, the angle
necessary to find to calculate the shortest flight path. In order to derive the equation for the central angle, we must solve for
( dr ) .
hav (Θ) = hav ( rd ) = sin2 ( Θ2 ) hav ( rd ) = h h = sin2 ( Θ2 )
Since we want Θ alone, we must take the square root of both sides to get:
√h = sin( Θ2 ) arcsin√h =
Θ 2
Since Θ =
d r
, you can substitute this back into the equation to get:
d arsin√h = 2r 2arcsin√h = dr
Next, since hav ( d ) = h , this means that r
h = hav (ϕ2 − ϕ1 ) + cos (ϕ1 ) cos (ϕ2 ) hav (λ2 − λ1 ) , and since
hav (Θ) = sin2 ( Θ2 ) , this means that h = sin2
(
ϕ 2−ϕ 1 2
) + cos (ϕ ) cos (ϕ ) sin ( ) 1
2
2
λ2 −λ1 2
Lastly, h can be substituted from 2arcsin√h = dr , to give the equation 2
"Haversine Formula." Wikipedia . Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 26 Apr. 2016.
4
d r
= 2arcsin
√
sin 2 ( ϕ2−2 ϕ1 ) + c osϕ1cosϕ2sin 2 (λ2−λ1 ) 2
I Since this formula was foreign to me, I needed to find an online source that was able to guide me in the right direction for deriving this formula. However, this online source was only a guide as it did not show the full steps to deriving the formula for the central angle and I was able to derive this independently by learning more about the Haversine Formula. Through this, I was able to better understand where the formula came from and understand it well, giving me a greater depth of knowledge and understanding for my exploration. Below, the formula that I derived is used to find the central angle needed to find the fastest flying distance between New York and Manila. ϕ 1 = l atitude of 1st place in radians, λ1 = l ongitude of 1st place in radians ϕ 2 = l atitude of 2nd place in radians, λ2 = l ongitude of 2nd place in radians d r
= 2arcsin
√
sin 2 ( ϕ2−2 ϕ1 ) + c osϕ1cosϕ2sin 2 (λ2−λ1 ) 3 2
New York: ϕ 1 = 40° 43′N , λ1 = 73° 45′W 4 Manila: ϕ 2 = 14° 35′N , λ2 = 120° 59′E 5 Since the angle needs to be expressed in radians in order to use the equation that relates the arc length of a circle to the center angle, the longitudes and latitudes of each city must be converted into radians as well. The coordinates are written with the first two digits as the degrees and the second two digits as minutes out of 60. Therefore for example the latitude of NewYork would be40 ° and43/60minutes. A sample calculation of converting these coordinates into radians is shown on the next page.
ϕ1 =
40+(43/60) 180
ϕ1 =
40+(0.716...) 180
×π ×π
3
Bourne, Murray. "3-D Earth Geometry." Intmathcom RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Feb. 2016. "Latitude and Longitude Facts." Latitude And Longitude. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Feb. 2016. 5 "Location of Philippines." Philippines Latitude, Longitude, Absolute and Relative Locations. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Feb. 2016.
4
5
ϕ1 =
40.716 180
×π
ϕ1 = 0.7106... The same process of calculations was usedtofindthe other latitude and longitudes in radians of New York and Manila. New York: ϕ1 = 0.7106..., λ1 = 1.2871... Manila: ϕ2 = 0.2545..., λ2 = 2.1115... For the center angle equation, the difference between the two latitudes and the two longitudes is necessary, this equation is shown below.
ϕ2 − ϕ1 = 0.2545... − 0.7106... = − 0.6047... λ2 − λ1 = 2.1115... − 1.2871... = 0.8243... By using these different latitudes and longitudes and differences between the two, these valuescan be substituted into the center angle equation to find the angle in radians the two cities make. If x = central angle then the domain is 0 < x ≤ 180. This is because if you want to find the shortest flight path, you need the shortest arc length of the great circle and therefore it needs to be the smaller angle out of the two. Since on a circle there will always be two angles to get from one point to the other, x and (360-x), the smaller angle less than 180 will always be the one needed if you want to find the shortest distance.
2arcsin
√
2arcsin
√sin
sin 2 2
(
ϕ2−ϕ1 2
) + cosϕ1cosϕ2sin
2
( λ2−λ1 2 )
( −0.456... ) ) + cos (0.7106...) cos (0.2545) sin 2 ( 0.8243... 2 2
= 0.942117161 With this center angle, the formula that relates arc length of a circle to the center angle in radians can be used. The approximate radius of the Earth is 6371 km6 therefore this is the radius that will be used in the equation. By finding this arc length, this is the same as finding the distance on a great circle the plane will travel from one destination to another. 6
"Earth Radius." Wikipedia . Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 04 Apr. 2016.
6
S = Let the arc length between the two cities
S = rΘ S = 6371 × 2.1994... S = 14012.85836 This distance found is in km but in order to find the approximate time it takes to travel this flight path, the distance needs to be converted to nautical miles since this is the unit of measurement used for travel. 1 Nautical Mile (NM) = 0.539957 Kilometers
N M = 14012.8583 × 0.539957 N M = 7566.340961 With the distance in nautical miles of the flight path known, the approximate time in hours of the flight can be found. Here, the NM are divided by 500 because this is approximately how many nautical miles an airplane flies in an hour.7
T ime = Distance (NM ) ÷ 500 T ime = 7566.3409... ÷ 500 T ime = 15.1326819 hours Therefore, with this first method, it should take approximately 15.1 hours to fly fromNewYorktoManilaon a Great Circle path. This procedure is accurate to a moderate extent since it does not take into account other external forces such as winds and jet streams. In addition I think it is accurate to a moderate extent until the time is determined because it is very difficult to estimate how many nautical miles a plane flies per hour since it varies with each plane, flight path, and vectors. The result is a bit faster than I had expected but this is most likely due to the flight time not taking into account the wind and jet streams as mentioned above. Optimum Flight Path Method 2:
7
"Convert Knots to Miles Per Hour." Knots to Miles Per Hour. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Apr. 2016.
7
The second method I used to calculate the optimum flight path from New York to Manila was by using the Lenárt Sphere. I taught myself how to use the Lenárt Sphere from the booklet provided, learning how to plot accurate coordinates and drawing great circles using the tools provided. Additionally, in order to use the Lenárt Sphere to calculate the optimum flight path, I had to teach myself spherical trigonometry and how it works.Spherical trigonometrywouldbe used in this situation, since by drawing spherical triangles, the distances between the two points can be found using trigonometry. These curved distances are on great paths therefore being the shortest distance between two points. Below is a picture of the Lenárt Sphere apparatus used. Figure 3: Various Equipment for the Lenárt Sphere
First, I plotted the coordinates of New York and Manila on the sphere using the protractor and compass provided. Once these coordinates were plotted, I used the spherical ruler to draw a great circle through these points. Next, in order to create a spherical triangle with lengths part of great circles, I picked a third point on the sphere and drew great circles through those points as well. From this constructed spherical triangle, I found the angles using the protractor. With the three angles of the spherical triangle, it is possible to find the center angle again at the center of the earth by using the spherical AAA law of cosines. This center angle can then be used to find the arc length or distance from one point to another. Figure 4: Spherical Triangle on the Lenárt Sphere
8
Let c = the center angle in the Earth between the two cities
( c = arccos ( c = arccos
cos(c) + cos(b)cos(a) sin(a)sin(b)
) ) 8
cos(130) + cos(34)cos(63) sin(63)sin(34)
c = 122.3237154 In order to use the formula that relates arc length of a circle to the center angle, the angle needs to be changed from degrees to radians since radians is used to calculate arc length.
Radians =
Degrees 180
×π
Radians =
122.32... 180
×π
Radians = 2.13495188 From this information, the arc length can be found from New York to Manila.
S = rΘ S = 6371 × 2.13... 8
"Three Angles Given (Spherical AAA)." Wikipedia . Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 27 Feb. 2016.
9
S = 13601.77656 km Since S uses the radian of the Earth and the angle between the two cities, and because the angle between the two cities has to be less than or equal to π , then the domain for S is 0 < S ≤ 20015.0868 Again, using the same formula above, the approximate time it takes to travel this distance can be used after converting kilometers to nautical miles. This distance in nautical miles is 7,344.37 nautical miles. Using this formula we can approximate that it takes about 14.69 hours to travel from New York to Manila. For both of these optimum flight paths, from New York to Manila, the spherical triangles showthat you should travel West over the Arctic and eastern Russia. Although the Philippines is south of New York and it does not seem to make sense to fly North as the shortest flight path, flying over the Arctic is the shortest flight path since New York, Manila, and apointintheArctic are all collinear locations in spherical geometry and lie on the same great circle thereforemakingthis theshortest flight path since great circle paths are the fastest. Through both of these methods, the flying times differ by less than an hour. Considering this, I believe that these methods are rather accurate. I think that the reason these values differed slightly is solely due to human error as using the lenárt sphere is not 100% accurate since the points I plotted are not as precise as the latitudes and longitudes although I tried to make it as precise as possible. Therefore, due to this inaccuracy the angle measurements would differ affecting the solution as the equation used relies greatly on the angles formed.
Real Flight Path Flying West: In order to investigate whether it is better to fly East or West, I calculated the distances of two real flight paths to see which one is shorter. The first flight path I used is Philippine Airlines with a stopo...