MC 117 Assessment and Eval. in Teaching Mathematics Syllabus PDF

Title MC 117 Assessment and Eval. in Teaching Mathematics Syllabus
Author Sir Patrick
Course Teacher Education
Institution Saint Louis University Philippines
Pages 16
File Size 496.6 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 400
Total Views 683

Summary

The Great Plebeian College College Department Course SyllabusCourse Code/TitleMC117 Assessment and Evaluation in Teaching MathematicsDay/Time/Room TTh 1:00PM-2:30PM Instructor Patrick Dave R. Consay Consultation Hours8:00AM - 8:00PMCourse Description :This course is designed to provide students an i...


Description

The Great Plebeian College College Department Course Syllabus Course Code/Title Day/Time/Room Instructor Consultation Hours

MC117 Assessment and Evaluation in Teaching Mathematics TTh 1:00PM-2:30PM Patrick Dave R. Consay 8:00AM - 8:00PM

Course Description: This course is designed to provide students an in-depth knowledge and understanding of the principles of valid and useful assessment and evaluation practices and their role in the educative process. The course gives emphasis on the use and development of modified traditional type of assessment, authentic and alternative assessment strategies to gauge the extent of learning in Mathematics. Moreover, it discusses issues and trends in assessment in mathematics teaching. As a requirement, the students are to construct test types aligned with the competencies and performance standards of K to 12 as well as construct evaluation tools for performance-based assessment.

Learning Outcomes (LOs) Graduate Attributes LO1: Expert Learner



At the end of the course, the students will be able to: Exhibit knowledge and skills in designing formative and summative assessment on mathematics concepts and problem solving.

LO2: Critical and Creative Thinker

 

Exhibit the proficiency in relating mathematics to other curricular areas Create multiple techniques out of certain mathematical topic to ensure learning

LO3: Fluent and Effective Communicator



Express knowledge in teaching mathematics using different strategies and styles

Exhibit competence in mathematical concepts and procedures Manifest meaningful and comprehensive pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics

LO4: Expert Self

 

LO5: Expert Doer

 Demonstrate competence in designing, constructing, and utilizing different forms of assessment in mathematics  Display proficiency in integrating assessment practices in Mathematics with other subject area or disciplines  Demonstrate understanding of meaningful assessment by aligning assessment with learning competencies and learning experiences.  Demonstrate competence and skills in implementing different assessment techniques to facilitate student success in learning Mathematics using learner attainment data;

LO6: Expert Community Participant LO7: Expert Agent of Change

Final Course Output LEARNING OUTCOME LO1, LO2, LO3, LO6

LO1, LO2, LO3

LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5, LO6, LO7

 Appreciate mathematics as an opportunity for creative work, moments of enlightenment, discovery and gaining insights of the world  Show appreciation in using authentic and alternative assessment methods in Mathematics learning.

             

REQUIRED OUTPUT Module Activities Online Quizzes Assignments Examinations Module Activities Take-home Quizzes Assignments Examinations Online Group Works/Activities Video Presentation Module Activities Take-home Quizzes Assignments Examinations

DUE DATE Week 4

Week 9

Week 14

LO1, LO2, LO3, LO5, LO6, LO7

      

Learning Plan LOs Topics LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

 Outcomes-based Assessment   

Week 19

Compilation of all Modules Video Presentation Online Group Works/Activities Module Activities Presentation/Demonstration Assignments Examinations

Assessment and Evaluation of Learning in Mathematics DepEd Policies on Assessment especially on Mathematics K-12 Skills and Attitudes in K-12 Mathematics Learning Outcomes

Week # 1-2

Experiential Learning Activities Discussions through modules/handouts; Video Discussions; via Google Classroom; and via Google Meet

References    



 

Cartwright, R. et al. (2009). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Handbook. Maryland: Montgomery College. Darling – Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005) Preparing teachers for changing world. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons. Department of Education Order No. 8, s. 2015 If then statement. (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.mathplanet.com/education/geo metry/proof/if-then-statement Logic and Mathematics (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from http://www.math.toronto.edu/preparing-forcalculus/3_logic/we_2_if_then.html Mueller, J. (2011). Authentic Assessment. Nashville, III.: Northcentral Colleges. Navarro, R.L & De Guzman-Santos, R. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Quezon City: Lorimar

  LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Program Course and Intended Learning Outcomes 





Construction of:  Program Learning Outcomes  Course Learning Outcomes  Intended Learning Outcomes Mapping Program Learning Outcomes with Course Learning Outcomes based on the DepEd Mathematics Curriculum Guide Mapping Course Learning Outcomes with Intended Learning Outcomes based on the DepEd Mathematics Curriculum Guide

3-4

Discussions through modules/handouts; Video Discussions; via Google Classroom; and via Google Meet

   



 

 

Publishing Inc. Navarro, R. L., Santos, R. G., & Corpuz, B. B. (2017). Assessment of Learning. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, M. (1998). Understanding by Design. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Cartwright, R. et al. (2009). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Handbook. Maryland: Montgomery College. Darling – Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005) Preparing teachers for changing world. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons. Department of Education Order No. 8, s. 2015 If then statement. (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.mathplanet.com/education/geo metry/proof/if-then-statement Logic and Mathematics (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from http://www.math.toronto.edu/preparing-forcalculus/3_logic/we_2_if_then.html Mueller, J. (2011). Authentic Assessment. Nashville, III.: Northcentral Colleges. Navarro, R.L & De Guzman-Santos, R. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Navarro, R. L., Santos, R. G., & Corpuz, B. B. (2017). Assessment of Learning. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, M. (1998).

LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

 Performance Standards, Competencies, and Learning Targets in Mathematics   

6

Performance Standards, Competencies, and Objectives Articulation of Performance Standards into Competencies Articulation of Competencies into Learning Targets

Discussions through modules/handouts; Video Discussions; via Google Classroom; and via Google Meet

   



 

  LO1 LO2 LO3

 Authentic Assessment Methods in

Mathematics Education  Designing Authentic

7

Discussions through modules/handouts; Video Discussions;



Understanding by Design. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Cartwright, R. et al. (2009). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Handbook. Maryland: Montgomery College. Darling – Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005) Preparing teachers for changing world. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons. Department of Education Order No. 8, s. 2015 If then statement. (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.mathplanet.com/education/geo metry/proof/if-then-statement Logic and Mathematics (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from http://www.math.toronto.edu/preparing-forcalculus/3_logic/we_2_if_then.html Mueller, J. (2011). Authentic Assessment. Nashville, III.: Northcentral Colleges. Navarro, R.L & De Guzman-Santos, R. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Navarro, R. L., Santos, R. G., & Corpuz, B. B. (2017). Assessment of Learning. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, M. (1998). Understanding by Design. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Cartwright, R. et al. (2009). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Handbook. Maryland: Montgomery College.

LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

via Google Classroom; and via Google Meet

Assessment ▪ Project-based Learning ▪ GRASPS Framework ▪ Three modes of Authentic Assessment (Observation, Performance Tasks, Actual Performance)

  



 

  LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

 Summative Tests (Performancebased)  

Writing of Project-based in a GRASPS Framework Presentation of Real-life Problems in GRASPS

8

Discussions through modules/handouts; Video Discussions; via Google Classroom; and via Google Meet

  

Darling – Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005) Preparing teachers for changing world. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons. Department of Education Order No. 8, s. 2015 If then statement. (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.mathplanet.com/education/geo metry/proof/if-then-statement Logic and Mathematics (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from http://www.math.toronto.edu/preparing-forcalculus/3_logic/we_2_if_then.html Mueller, J. (2011). Authentic Assessment. Nashville, III.: Northcentral Colleges. Navarro, R.L & De Guzman-Santos, R. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Navarro, R. L., Santos, R. G., & Corpuz, B. B. (2017). Assessment of Learning. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, M. (1998). Understanding by Design. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Cartwright, R. et al. (2009). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Handbook. Maryland: Montgomery College. Darling – Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005) Preparing teachers for changing world. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons. Department of Education Order No. 8, s. 2015





 

  LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

 Evaluation Tools Used in Authentic Assessment   

Individual or Group Checklist in Problem-Solving in Mathematics Interview Sheet Assessment Tools

9

Discussions through modules/handouts; Video Discussions; via Google Classroom; and via Google Meet

   



If then statement. (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.mathplanet.com/education/geo metry/proof/if-then-statement Logic and Mathematics (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from http://www.math.toronto.edu/preparing-forcalculus/3_logic/we_2_if_then.html Mueller, J. (2011). Authentic Assessment. Nashville, III.: Northcentral Colleges. Navarro, R.L & De Guzman-Santos, R. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Navarro, R. L., Santos, R. G., & Corpuz, B. B. (2017). Assessment of Learning. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, M. (1998). Understanding by Design. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Cartwright, R. et al. (2009). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Handbook. Maryland: Montgomery College. Darling – Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005) Preparing teachers for changing world. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons. Department of Education Order No. 8, s. 2015 If then statement. (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.mathplanet.com/education/geo metry/proof/if-then-statement Logic and Mathematics (2019). Retrieved

 

  LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

 Other formative Assessment   

Process-oriented Assessment Analytical Scoring Rubric vs. Holistic Rubric Construction of Holistic and Analytical Scoring Rubric

11

Discussions through modules/handouts; Video Discussions; via Google Classroom; and via Google Meet

   





March 4, 2019 from http://www.math.toronto.edu/preparing-forcalculus/3_logic/we_2_if_then.html Mueller, J. (2011). Authentic Assessment. Nashville, III.: Northcentral Colleges. Navarro, R.L & De Guzman-Santos, R. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Navarro, R. L., Santos, R. G., & Corpuz, B. B. (2017). Assessment of Learning. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, M. (1998). Understanding by Design. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Cartwright, R. et al. (2009). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Handbook. Maryland: Montgomery College. Darling – Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005) Preparing teachers for changing world. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons. Department of Education Order No. 8, s. 2015 If then statement. (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.mathplanet.com/education/geo metry/proof/if-then-statement Logic and Mathematics (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from http://www.math.toronto.edu/preparing-forcalculus/3_logic/we_2_if_then.html Mueller, J. (2011). Authentic Assessment. Nashville, III.: Northcentral Colleges.



  LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

 Development of Varied Paper and Pencil Tests in Mathematics 

Planning and Constructing of Table of Specification for a Quarter

12

Discussions through modules/handouts; Video Discussions; via Google Classroom; and via Google Meet

   



 



Navarro, R.L & De Guzman-Santos, R. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Navarro, R. L., Santos, R. G., & Corpuz, B. B. (2017). Assessment of Learning. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, M. (1998). Understanding by Design. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Cartwright, R. et al. (2009). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Handbook. Maryland: Montgomery College. Darling – Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005) Preparing teachers for changing world. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons. Department of Education Order No. 8, s. 2015 If then statement. (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.mathplanet.com/education/geo metry/proof/if-then-statement Logic and Mathematics (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from http://www.math.toronto.edu/preparing-forcalculus/3_logic/we_2_if_then.html Mueller, J. (2011). Authentic Assessment. Nashville, III.: Northcentral Colleges. Navarro, R.L & De Guzman-Santos, R. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Navarro, R. L., Santos, R. G., & Corpuz, B.

 LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

 Test Items in Mathematics assessment  Multiple Choice  Traditional Multiple Choice  Modified Multiple Choice

13

Discussions through modules/handouts; Video Discussions; via Google Classroom; and via Google Meet

  

 True or False Items  Traditional True or False  Modified True or False





 

 

B. (2017). Assessment of Learning. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, M. (1998). Understanding by Design. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Cartwright, R. et al. (2009). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Handbook. Maryland: Montgomery College. Darling – Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005) Preparing teachers for changing world. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons. Department of Education Order No. 8, s. 2015 If then statement. (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.mathplanet.com/education/geo metry/proof/if-then-statement Logic and Mathematics (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from http://www.math.toronto.edu/preparing-forcalculus/3_logic/we_2_if_then.html Mueller, J. (2011). Authentic Assessment. Nashville, III.: Northcentral Colleges. Navarro, R.L & De Guzman-Santos, R. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Navarro, R. L., Santos, R. G., & Corpuz, B. B. (2017). Assessment of Learning. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, M. (1998). Understanding by Design. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

 Supply Type or Constructed Response Type  Supply Type of Test: Essay i. Restricted Essay ii. Non-restricted Essay

14

Discussions through modules/handouts; Video Discussions; via Google Classroom; and via Google Meet

   



 

 

Cartwright, R. et al. (2009). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Handbook. Maryland: Montgomery College. Darling – Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005) Preparing teachers for changing world. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons. Department of Education Order No. 8, s. 2015 If then statement. (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.mathplanet.com/education/geo metry/proof/if-then-statement Logic and Mathematics (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from http://www.math.toronto.edu/preparing-forcalculus/3_logic/we_2_if_then.html Mueller, J. (2011). Authentic Assessment. Nashville, III.: Northcentral Colleges. Navarro, R.L & De Guzman-Santos, R. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Navarro, R. L., Santos, R. G., & Corpuz, B. B. (2017). Assessment of Learning. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, M. (1998). Understanding by Design. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

 Interpreting Formative and Summative Results  Validation Rate for Instructional Decision in Formative Assessment  Students’ Performance in Summative Examination into: • Beginner (79 and below) • Developing (80 to 84) • Approaching Proficiency (85-89) • Proficient (90-94) • Outstanding (95 -100)

16-17

Discussions through modules/handouts; Video Discussions; via Google Classroom; and via Google Meet

   



 

 

Cartwright, R. et al. (2009). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Handbook. Maryland: Montgomery College. Darling – Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005) Preparing teachers for changing world. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons. Department of Education Order No. 8, s. 2015 If then statement. (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.mathplanet.com/education/geo metry/proof/if-then-statement Logic and Mathematics (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from http://www.math.toronto.edu/preparing-forcalculus/3_logic/we_2_if_then.html Mueller, J. (2011). Authentic Assessment. Nashville, III.: Northcentral Colleges. Navarro, R.L & De Guzman-Santos, R. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Navarro, R. L., Santos, R. G., & Corpuz, B. B. (2017). Assessment of Learning. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, M. (1998). Understanding by Design. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5 LO6 LO7

 Grade Computations 

Grade Computations following the DepEd policy

18-19

Discussions through modules/handouts; Video Discussions; via Google Classroom; and via Google Meet

   



 

 

Cartwright, R. et al. (2009). Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Handbook. Maryland: Montgomery College. Darling – Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005) Preparing teachers for changing world. San Francisco: John Willey & Sons. Department of Education Order No. 8, s. 2015 If then statement. (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from https://www.mathplanet.com/education/geo metry/proof/if-then-statement Logic and Mathematics (2019). Retrieved March 4, 2019 from http://www.math.toronto.edu/preparing-forcalculus/3_logic/we_2_if_then.html Mueller, J. (2011). Authentic Assessment. Nashville, III.: Northcentral Colleges. Navarro, R.L & De Guzman-Santos, R. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc. Navarro, R. L., Santos, R. G., & Corpuz, B. B. (2017). Assessment of Learning. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing Inc...


Similar Free PDFs