Title | MR24309 AUT2021 L11 Interviews Focus Groups v07 04052021 PDF |
---|---|
Author | Siyu Wang |
Course | Marketing Research |
Institution | University of Technology Sydney |
Pages | 41 |
File Size | 2.5 MB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 116 |
Total Views | 144 |
mr weekly lecture power point 2021 mr weekly lecture power point 2021...
2021
Interviews&FocusGroups
WithDrPaulBurke
WHERE ARE WE UP TO? (COMPLETED!)
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
2
WHERE ARE WE UP TO? (WEEK 11)
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
3
OVERVIEW OF WEEK 11
FocusGroupsandInterviews Whatareproandconsofqualitativedata? Whatareprosandconsoffocusgroups andinterviews? Whataresomeconsiderationsforboth techniquesthatcanimproveresearch outcomes? Whataresomebasicwaystolookatthe datathatemergesfromthesetechniques?
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
4
AreminderfromLecture1
TYPES OF PRIMARY DATA – PROS AND CONS Source
Pros
Cons
Interviews
• In‐depthinformationcanbe • Time‐consuming. collected. • Expensive. • Non‐responseandresponse • Interviewerbias biascanbedetected. • Samplescanbecontrolled
Surveys& Questionnaires
• Respondentshaveadequate • Ahighrateofnon‐response timetogiveresponses. bias. • Freeinterviewer bias • Inflexible;difficulttochange • Cheapercomparedto oncesent. interviews • Can beaslowprocess (particularlymail)
Social media monitoring
• Relativelyinexpensive • Quickandrealtime
• Securityandprivacy concerns • Opinionsbiased • Maynotberepresentative
AreminderfromLecture1
TYPES OF PRIMARY DATA (CONT.) Source
Pros
Cons
Observation
• Datausuallyobjective. • Datanotaffectedbypast orfutureevents.
• Informationislimited. • Expensive
Focusgroups
• Lowercostcomparedto interviews. • Lessertimetoo than speakingtoeach individual • Stimulatesideas/views fromotherparticipants • Canrespondtotangible stimuli
• Responsebiasisa probleminthiscase becauseaparticipant mightbesubjectiveto whatpeoplewillthink aboutsharingasincere opinion. • Groupthinkingdoesnot clearlymirrorindividual opinions.
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
6
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH • Gainpreliminaryinsightstodecisionproblemsand opportunities – Methodsincludeprobing,interviews,open‐endedor unstructuredquestions,observation,feedback – Preliminaryinsightsaresometimesfollowedupwith quantitativeresearchtoverifythequalitativefindings
• Applicableforexploratoryresearchdesigns – Whenobjectivesfocusongainingbackgroundinformation, definingtermsandestablishingresearchpriorities
24309 M7ARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
7
QUALITATIVE VS QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
8
WHEN TO USE QUAL RESEARCH?
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
9
FOCUS GROUPS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH • Aformalisedprocessofbringingasmallgroupof peopletogetherforaninteractive,spontaneous discussionononeparticulartopicorconcept – Usually6‐12peopleareguidedbyamoderatorthroughan unstructureddiscussionthatmaytypicallyoccupyoneto threehours.
• Themainpurposeistogaininsightintothetopicof interest.Valueoftechniqueliesintheunexpected findings oftenobtainedfromafree‐flowing group discussion. 24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
10
FOCUS GROUPS: PROS AND CONS Advantages
Disadvantages
• Stimulatesnewideas,thoughtsand feelingsaboutatopic • Canuncoverunderlyingreasons • Fostersanunderstandingofwhy peopleactorbehave • Clientparticipation • Elicitswide‐rangingcustomer responses • Bringstogetherhard‐to‐reach groups
• • • •
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
Inabilitytogeneraliseresults Questionablereliabilityofresults Subjectivityofinterpretation Highcostperparticipant
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
11
FOCUS GROUP RESEARCH OBJECTIVES 1. Providedatafordefiningandredefiningmarketingproblem 2. Identifyspecifichiddeninformationrequirements 3. Providedataforbetterunderstandingtheresultsfromother quantitativesurveystudies 4. Revealconsumers’ hiddenneeds,wants,attitudes,feelings, behaviours,perceptionsandmotivesregardingservices,products orpractices 5. Generatenewideasaboutproducts,servicesordeliverymethods 6. Discovernewconstructsandmeasurementmethods 7. Tohelpexplainchangingconsumerpreferences
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
12
FOCUS GROUP PARTICIPANTS • Centralfactorsintheselectionprocess – Strongconsiderationofthestudy’spurposeandthink aboutwhocanbestprovidetherequisiteinformation – Potentialgroupdynamics – Willingnessofmemberstoengageindialogue – Individuals’knowledgeofthetopic – Groupshouldbehomogeneousenoughtoencourage comfortanddiscouragesociallyacceptableresponses, whileallowingenoughvariationtoallowforcontrasting opinions
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
13
SELECTING FOCUS GROUP PARTICIPANTS
Numberof participants
Between6and12
Incentives
Increasethelikelihoodofparticipation; Rangingfrom$50to$200perperson
Numberoffocus groups
Aseriesofsessionsisrequired Typicallyminimumtwogroups
Locationoffocus groups
ProfessionalFGfacility,appropriatelocation
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
14
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
15
GOOD MODERATOR TRAITS • • • • • • • • • •
Goodinterpersonal,communicationsandinterpretiveskills Displayprofessionalismandcreatepositivegroupdynamics Goodunderstandingofthetopicsandquestions Skilledinaskingfollow‐upprobingquestions Communicateclearlyandpreciselybothinwritingandverbally Exhibitafriendly,courteousandadaptivepersonality Thepersonshouldbeexperiencedinfocusgroupresearch Quickmindcapableofnotingandprobingnewideas Knowhowandwhentobringclosuretoonetopicandmovethediscussionto thenext Usesaguidethatprovidesadetailedoutlineofthetopics,questionsandsub‐ questionsthatwillserveasthebasisforgeneratingthespontaneousinteractive dialogueamongthegroupparticipants.Theguideshouldprovideastructured outlineformatthatestablishesanorderforaskingaseriesofopening, introductory,transition,criticalandendingquestions
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
16
THE FOCUS GROUP SESSION
The beginning session
The main session
The closing session
• Makeparticipantsfeelcomfortable,completeconsent forms,outlinegroundrules,enableparticipant introductions
• Introducethetopics,applyprobingtechniquesas necessary,ensurethatcriticalissuesareaddressed
• Presentclosingquestions,summarisethemainpoints, debrief,showappreciationandmakearrangementsfor incentivestobedistributed
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
17
ANALYSING FOCUS GROUPS OUTCOMES
Consider the words
• Variety of words and phrases • Classify them based on similarity
Consider the context
• Understand the context in which certain expressions were given • Tones and intensity (voice inflection) • Nonverbal cues (body language)
Frequency of the comments
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
• More people talk the same topic • Some comments made more frequently
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
18
ANALYSING FOCUS GROUPS OUTCOMES
Intensity of the comments
Specificity of responses
Consider the big picture
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
• Some topics with passion or deep feelings • Changes in tone, speed and emphasis
• Responses with emotional first-hand experience are more intense
• Construct an aggregate theme or message of what is being portrayed • Big picture provides preliminary insights
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
19
INTERVIEWS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH • Formalisedprocessinwhich awell‐trainedinterviewer asksasubjectasetofsemi‐ structuredquestionsina face‐to‐facesetting – Athome,office,centralised interviewingcentre,product location,purchaselocation, randomlocationsetc. – Couldbeonline(zoom!) – Alsoreferredtoas‘in‐depth’ or‘one‐on‐one’ 24
RKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
20
IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING TECHNIQUES • Collectionofattitudinalandbehaviouraldialogue throughprobingquestions – Whenaninterviewertakesthesubject’sinitialresponseto aquestionandusesthatresponseastheframeworkfor thenextquestion(theprobingquestion)inordertogain moredetailedresponses
• Interpretationsofthedialoguetocreatetheme categoriesandinsights
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
21
IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS: PROS AND CONS Advantages • Flexibilitytocollectdataon activitiesandbehaviour patterns,andattitudes, motivationsandfeelings. • Largeamountofdetailed datapossible. • Thepossibilitytoprobethe respondentfurther • Notinfluencedbypresence ofotherparticipantslike focusgroup • Mayfeelmorecomfortable to“openup” 24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
Disadvantages • Lackofgeneralisability. • Inabilitytodistinguishsmall differences. • Lackofreliabilityand validity. • Potentialforbiasesto emerge. • Potentialinterviewererrors. • Costsandtime
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
22
TYPES OF INTERVIEWS • Experienceinterviews(i.e.,talkingtoexperts) • Protocolinterviews(i.e.,talkaloudaboutadecisionprocess) • Articulative interviews(eg,identifyingconflictinconsuming goodsvsunderlyingbeliefs/culture/orientation) • Projectiveinterviews – – – – – – –
Wordassociationtests Sentencecompletiontests Picturetests Thematicappreciationtest(TAT) Cartoonorballoontests Role‐playingactivities Zaltman MetaphorElicitationTechnique(ZMET)
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
23
EXAMPLE: PROJECTIVE INTERVIEWS
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
24
EXAMPLE: PROJECTIVE INTERVIEWS
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
25
EXAMPLE: PROJECTIVE INTERVIEWS
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
26
QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS • • •
Dataistextualandoccasionallyvisualandthegoal is‘understanding’ Qualitativedataanalysistendstobeongoingand iterative Qualitativedataanalysisislargelyinductive – categories,themes,patternsemergefromthedata; ratherthandefinedpriortodatacollection
• •
Qualitativedataneedstobecollected& transcribed ‘Toomuch’ detaileddata! – Transcriptionofaudio/videotapes – Researcherobservationrecordingsandnotes – Fieldnotesbyethnographers
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
27
MANAGING THE DATA COLLECTION • Qualitativedatamustbetranscribedforanalysis – Textfromonlinefocusgroupsandnetnography is producedautomaticallyandisimmediatelyavailablefor analysis – Audiotapeorvideotaperecordingshavetobetranscribed – Notesfromthefield,duringobservation,debriefsneedto integrated – Correctionsandadjustmentsneedtobemadetothe transcription
• Allqualitativedatamaterialshouldbeindexedand relatedmaterialshouldbecross‐indexed. 24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
28
DATA REDUCTION (STEP 1) • Theamountofqualitativedatacanbeextensive – Datareductionprocessesallowustoreadthrough transcriptsanddevelopcategoriestorepresentthedata
• Datareductioncanbedonethrough: – – – – – –
categorisationandcoding Comparison theorybuilding iteration negativecaseanalysis tabulation
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
29
CODING
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
30
DATA REDUCTION: CATEGORISATION AND CODING • Categorisesectionsofthetranscriptandlabelthem withnamesorcodenumbers • Categories – maybedefinedbeforetheanalysis – canbedevelopedinductivelyintheanalysisprocess – maybemodifiedandcombinedasanalysiscontinues
• Acodesheetisadocumentwithallthecategories andcodesonit – Codescanbewordsornumbers
• Popularsoftwareused:NVivoandATLAS 24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
31
DATA REDUCTION: TABULATION • Frequencyofmention,re‐occurrenceandco‐ occurrenceofkeywords,concepts,codesand responses • Showsexacttimesofoccurrenceofspecificcodes • Controversial – Notallquestionsareaskedinthesameway – Notallresponsesaregiveninthesameway – Frequencyofmentionisnotagoodmeasureof importance
• Furtheriterativeanalysisisrequiredtosupportor refutethecredibilityoftabulationanalysis 24309 M32 ARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
32
DATA REDUCTION: TABULATION
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
33
WORD CLOUD: IS JUST A (CO-)FREQUENCY COUNT
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
34
MIND MAPS
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
35
DATA REDUCTION: NEGATIVE CASE ANALYSIS • Researchersdeliberatelylookforcasesandinstances thatcontradicttheideasandtheoriesthat researchershavebeendeveloping • Generallyideasandtheorygeneratedfromthedata shouldbeviewedwithskepticism – Weshouldnotbelookingforevidencetoconfirmpre‐ existingbiasesandearlypreliminaryfindings
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
36
CONCLUSION DRAWING/VERIFICATION •
•
Credibilityofqualitativedataanalysisisbasedontherigourofthe actualstrategiesusedforcollecting,coding,analysingandpresenting datafortheorygeneration Needtopersuadeaudiencesthattheresearchfindingsofaninquiry are:
– reliable(measurementandfindingsarestable, repeatableandgeneralisable) – valid(theresearchmeasureswhatitwasintendedto measure) •
Crossresearcherreliability
– Degreeofsimilarityinthecodingofthesamedata(text andimages)bydifferentresearchers •
Peerreview
– Externalqualitativemethodologyortopicareaexpertsareaskedtoreviewthe researchanalysisandfindings 24309 MARKETING RESEARCH @DRPAULBURKE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
37
CONCLUSION DRAWING/VERIFICATION THROUGH TRIANGULATION • Triangulation – Tocheckandestablishvalidityintheirstudiesbyanalysing aresearchquestionfrommultipleperspectives,suchas: multiplemethodsofdatacollectionandanalysis multipledatasets multipleresearchersanalysingthedata datacollectioninmultipletimeperiods acknowledgingdifferentandrelevantperspectivesand informants
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
38
CAREFUL …
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
39
THAT’S A WRAP ON FOCUS GROUPS & INTERVIEWS
FocusGroups&Interviews Whatareproandconsofqualitativedata? Whatareprosandconsoffocusgroups andinterviews? Whataresomeconsiderationsforboth techniquesthatcanimproveresearch outcomes? Whataresomebasicwaystolookatthe datathatemergesfromthesetechniques?
24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
40
TO DO …
• Reviewyourquizresultsand lookatthefeedbackdocument • Finalisingyourassignment submission • Beginpreparingyourfinalexams • Areviewlecturewilltakeplace inWeek12
Seeyouinclassnextweek! 24309 MARKETING RESEARCH
@DRPAULBURKE
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY (UTS)
41...