Post Hoc SPSS example - post hoc test notes PDF

Title Post Hoc SPSS example - post hoc test notes
Author Laura Andrews
Course Educational Statistics Ii
Institution Kent State University
Pages 4
File Size 253.3 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 69
Total Views 194

Summary

post hoc test notes...


Description

Post Hoc Tests: SPSS Procedures and Results This file will cover how to run Post Hoc tests through the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) function in SPSS. The file we will be using is titled “hourlywagedata.sav” which includes data from nurses. In this file, there are four variables; we will be focusing on two: “agerange” and “hourwage”. We will be running an F test with post hoc tests to determine if different age groups earned different amounts of money. To run post hoc tests, run a one-way ANOVA, follow the steps presented in Unit 2. In addition, when “Univariate” window is open, select “Post Hoc…”. You should see the following window:

As you can see, you cannot yet select post hoc tests yet. You need to move the variable, “agerange,” from the “Factor(s):” window to the “Post Hoc Tests for:” wondow. Then you can select from several post hoc tests. While you only really need to select one, I chose both Tukey and Scheffe for the sake of comparison.

Next, select “Continue” and then “Ok”. You should then see the output file. The output should look the same as the output for Unit 2. However, there will be a couple of additional tables at the end:

Post Hoc Tests Age Range Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable:Hourly Salary Mean Difference (I-J) Std. Error * -1.1391 .35962

95% Confidence Interval

(I) Age Range 18-30

(J) Age Range 31-45

31-45

46-65 18-30

-1.6431* 1.1391*

.39429 .35962

.000 .005

-2.5686 .2949

-.7176 1.9832

46-65

46-65 18-30

-.5041 1.6431*

.28277 .39429

.176 .000

-1.1678 .7176

.1597 2.5686

18-30

31-45 31-45

.5041 -1.1391*

.28277 .35962

.176 .007

-.1597 -2.0207

1.1678 -.2574

31-45

46-65 18-30

-1.6431* 1.1391*

.39429 .35962

.000 .007

-2.6097 .2574

-.6765 2.0207

46-65

46-65 18-30

-.5041 1.6431*

.28277 .39429

.205 .000

-1.1973 .6765

.1892 2.6097

31-45 .5041 .28277 Based on observed means. The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 14.748. *. The mean difference is significant at the

.205

-.1892

1.1973

Tukey HSD

Scheffe

Sig. .005

Lower Bound Upper Bound -1.9832 -.2949

So, we have 3 different age rages that we are comparing: 18-30, 31-45, and 46-65. SPSS does not actually provide the value of the Tukey or Scheffe statistics themselves, but does provide the significance levels. You can fairly easily calculate the values yourselves from the values provided in the output. One thing you should notice is that each comparison is presented twice in the table above. For example, SPSS provides the results of the test comparing group 1 to group 2 AND comparing group 2 to group 1, so one difference will be negative and one will be positive. However, it’s the same statistical test, as indicated by the p value or “Sig.” level. The results of the Tukey test indicate that there are significant differences between the 18-30 age group and the other two groups. However, there is not a statistically significant difference between the 31-45 group and the 46-65 group.

The results are similar for the Scheffe test. However, notice that the p values, or “Sig.” values, are a little bit larger for the Scheffe test compare to the Tukey test. This is because the Scheffe test is a more “conservative” test than the Tukey test, so there is less chance of a Type I error. The final table is the “Homogeneous Subsets” table. This table just presents the same results in a different way. As you can see in the table, Subset 1 only includes the 18-40 group, as it significantly differs from the other two. Subset 2 includes both the 31-45 and 46-65 age groups because they do not significantly differ from each other.

Homogeneous Subsets Hourly Salary Subset Age Range Tukey HSD

Scheffe

a,b,c

a,b,c

N

1

18-30 31-45

144 548

46-65

278

Sig. 18-30 31-45

144 548

46-65

278

Sig.

2

19.0438 20.1828 20.6869 1.000 19.0438

.318 20.1828 20.6869

1.000

.352

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on observed means. The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 14.748. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 242.593. b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed. c. Alpha =...


Similar Free PDFs