Title | PSYC101 Developmental Psychology |
---|---|
Author | Imogen Law |
Course | Understanding Psychology |
Institution | Lancaster University |
Pages | 36 |
File Size | 1.1 MB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 376 |
Total Views | 791 |
Piaget Theory of mind Attachment Prosocial behaviour Aggression Genetics and Behaviour – Nature And Nurture Genes, environment, parents and peers Adolescence Learning outcomes Evaluate the core theories of cognitive development · Descri...
Piaget Theory of mind Attachment Prosocial behaviour Aggression Genetics and Behaviour – Nature And Nurture Genes, environment, parents and peers
Adolescence Learning outcomes Evaluate the core theories of cognitive development · Describe prosocial development · Discuss issues relating to aggression · Examine children's understanding of mind
PIAGET'S THEORY Piaget's theory is based on the interactionist approach with the focus being on the interplay between nature and nurture. It is constructivist as it believes that the child plays an active role in constructing their own knowledge through interacting with the environment. Piaget created the clinical interview - open ended technique for eliciting children's thought processes. To understand how children think we must look at qualitative development of their ability to solve problems.
DEVELOPMENT OF SCHEMAS Piaget's theory of cognitive development is that even young infants possess simple skills that enable them to interact with the environment. He refers to these skills as schemas and they direct how infants explore and develop. Mental operations = schemas - reply to anything in child's world and how they grow and change. An example of this is the grab and thrust schema. Mum's reaction to thrusting e.g. an iPhone into mouth changes babies schema to thrusting. This theory states that children implicitly test hypotheses by performing experiments on objects and events. The resulting information modifies existing schemas and creates new ones - this develops the child's understanding of how the word works and how to act within it. E.g. infant directly manipulates objects or pouring liquids into different shaped glasses. His emphasis on activity was important in stimulating the child centeredness approach to education. Children develop schemas through assimilation and accommodation. Piaget's concepts of the unchanging aspects of thought - broad characteristics of intelligent activity that remain the same at all ages. These are the organisation of schemas and their adaptation through assimilation and accommodation. Organisation = refers to the inborn capacity to coordinate existing cognitive structures, or schemas, and combine them into more complex systems. Organisation also grows in complexity as the schemas become more elaborate. Adaptation = the striving of an organism for balance/equilibrium with the environment which is achieved through the complementary processes of assimilation and accommodation. Assimilation = the process of taking new information or a new experience and fitting it into an already existing schema. E.g. ability to perform a physical activity more accurately. Accommodation = the process where existing schemas are modified or new schemas are created to fit new information. E.g. dog and cat look similar but dogs bark and cats don't. Through these twin processes the child achieves a new state of equilibrium however this is not permanent. The balance will soon be upset as the child assimilates further new experiences or accommodates existing schemas. Assimilation helps the child to consolidate mental structures; accommodation results in growth and change. All adaptation contains components of both processes and striving for balance between assimilation and accommodation results in the child's intrinsic motivation to learn. Piaget considered intellectual development to be a continuous process of assimilation and accommodation. No defining line between the four stages of development - order is the same for everyone but the ages at which they are achieved may vary. Assimilation and accommodation are the two two sides of adaption (learning). Balance (equilibrium) is desired. If info doesn't fit with a schema then person feels a disequilibrium. Return to balance by adapting using assimilation or accommodation.
STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT The order is invariant though there is a possible variation in the rate of development. Under 7 = period of egocentrism but later with growth of logic make shift to distinguishing what they see from what they know.
Sensori-motor stage - 0-2 yrs. 0-1mths = reflex activity - reflex behaviour and spontaneous activities children born with. Behaviour largely assimilated. 1-4mths = primary circular reactions - Use senses and motor abilities to understand world. The schemas involve actions on real objects. They are egocentric - don't know that everyone has lives different to their own. Children repeat activities especially if pleasing e.g. thumb sucking - primary because the activities derive from reflexes of 1st period e.g. thumb sucking is assimilated into a schema based on innate sucking reflex. 4-10mths = secondary circular reactions. Not limited to repeat actions based on early reflexes but have initiated new actions. These new actions are repeated if satisfying. Actions aimed at influencing the environment e.g. hitting an object - Piaget 1936/1952 p182 - Jacqueline learns to make a doll hanging on cot swing by kicking it. 10-12mths=coordination of secondary circular reactions - combine different behaviours into one schema. 12-18mths = tertiary circular reactions - increased mobility = explore cause and effect. Behaviour more flexible - acts repeated with variation = different results - accommodation established schema into new contexts and needs. 18-24mths = internal representation - capacity for mental representation - can now act indirectly with world because has mental representation of world -allows them to think and plan - evidence of mental representation using object permanence - implies child has memory of the object -a mental representation of it. Also evidenced through planned behaviour- a child in earlier stages might succeed in their goals through a trial and error performance however in this later stage the child is able to plan ahead and act in a structured way to gain what they want - piaget 1936/1952 pg336-337 Jacqueline trying to open the door while carrying two blades of grass - puts the grass down to turn the knob. More evidence with deferred initiation - when a child carries out a behaviour that is copying the behaviour that they have seen some time before - piaget 1951 p63- watched boy have temper tantrum and replicated it the next day - since she was able to imitate the little boys behaviour a day later she must have retained an image of his behaviour - a mental representation of what she had seen the day before.
Reinterpretations of the sensori-motor stage. May have underestimated children's mental capacity to organise the sensory and motor information they taken. Bower 1982 examines Piaget's hypothesis that young children did not have an appreciation of objects if they were out of sight. Children a few months old were shown an object which was moved across in behind screen and then the screen was moved back to its original position. In one condition when the screen was moved back the objects was still in place but in the second condition the object was removed. The children's heart rate was monitored to measure changes which reflected surprise. According to Piaget, children's not show any reaction in the second condition. However, Bower found that children showed more surprise in the second condition compared to the first condition. Bower inferred that the children's reaction was because they had expected it to reappear. If so this will be evidence that young children retained an image or representation of the object in their head and this could be interpreted as children having a concept of object permanence at an earlier case than Piaget suggested. Meltzoff and Moore 1992 showed that six week old infant could imitate behaviour a day after they've seen the original behaviour. In the experiment children saw an adult make a facial gesture and others just saw the adults face was she maintained a neutral expression. The following day all the children saw the same person again but on this occasion she maintained a passive face. Compared to children who are not seen any gesture, the children who had seen the tongue protrusion gesture the day before were more likely to make the face to the adult the second time I saw her. They argue that to do this infants must have a memory representation of the gesture. If so this is evidence of mental representations much earlier than Piaget proposed.
Pre-operational stage - 2-7yrs The stage is divided into 2 into the pre-conceptual period (2 to 4 years) and the intuitive period at 4 - 7 years.
The preconceptual period - 2 to 4 Builds on the capacity for internal thoughts. Rapid increase in children's language which in Paiget’s view results from the development of symbolic thought. He differs from other theorists who argue that thought grows out of linguistic competence. Piaget’s theory is supported by research into the cognitive abilities of deaf children who despite limitations in language are able to reason and solve problems. Symbolic thought is also expressed and is imaginative play. Piaget identified limitations in the children's abilities in this stage. For example, the child is still centred in her own perspective and finds it difficult to understand that other people can look at things differently this is called egocentrism and this occurs because of the child's view that the Universe is centred on herself and finds it hard to decentre.
The three mountains experiment. Paiget and Inhelder 1956 asked children between the ages of 4 and 12 years to say how a doll would view a array of three mountains. 4 and 5 year olds often chose the view that they themselves could see and it was not until 8 or 9 years of age that children could confidently work out the doll’s view. However there have been several criticisms made of this task. Donaldson 1978 pointed out that is a particularly unusual task to use with young children who might not have such familiarity with model mountains. Borke 1975 carried out a similar task to Piaget's but she used layouts of toys. She found that children as young as 3 or 4 years had some understanding of how another person could view the layouts. This shows that this type of procedures and materials that are used can have a marked effect and how will children perform the task. There are also other kinds of perspective taking and these include the ability to empathize with other people's emotions, and the ability to know what other people are thinking. Research has found that by 4 or 5 years of age children do understand that different people can interpret the world in different way (Wimmer and Perner 1983). This basically shows that young children are less egocentric then Piaget presumed.
The intuitive period - 4 to 7 There is a further shift in thinking about the age of 4 years that the child begins to develop the mental operations of ordering, classifying and quantifying in a more systematic way. Even though a child can carry out such operations, she's largely unaware of the principles that underlie the operations and cannot explain why she's done them, nor can she cover them out in a fully satisfactory way. If a preoperational child is asked to arrange sticks in a certain order, for example put them in order of length, some free operational children cannot do this at all. Some arrange a few sticks correctly but not all and some put all the small ones in a group and all the larger ones in another. A more advanced response was to arrange the sticks so the tops of the sticks were in the correct order even though the bottoms were not. In short, the child at this stage is not capable of ordering more than very few objects. Piaget found that pre-operational children also have difficulty with class inclusion tasks. Suppose a child is given a box that contains 18 round beads and 2 white beads and all beads are wooden. The child is asked “are there more brown beads than wooden beads?” The preoperational child will typically reply that there were more brown beads. According to Piaget the child finds it hard to consider the class of all beads at the same time as considering the subset of beads,the class of brown beads. Such findings tend to be to true of all children in the pre-operational stage irrespective of their cultural background. Ginsberg and Opper 1989 found that Thai and Malaysian children give responses very similar to Swiss children.
Another aspect is conservation and this refers to a person's understanding that superficial changes in the appearance of quantity do not mean that there has been any fundamental change in that quantity. Piaget discovered that pre-operational children find it hard to understand that if an object is changed in shape of appearance it's qualities remain the same. Children under 7 fail conservation tasks because they lack the ability to perform mental operations (cognitive processes for transforming, separating and combining information). They lack the understanding of logical principles. Piaget suggested that a child has difficulty in a test like this because they can only focus on one attribute at a time. For a child to appreciate that the sausage of clay has the same amount of clear as a ball means understanding that the greater length of the sausage is compensated for by the smaller cross-section of the sausage. Piaget said that pre-operational children are unable to apply principles like compensation. Another process is reversibility. This means that children could think of reversing the change they have seen. According to Piaget preoperational children lack the thought processes needed to apply principles like compensation and reversibility, and therefore have difficulty in conservation tasks.
Reinterpretations of the preoperational stage Other researchers have pointed out that children's lack of success in some tasks may be due to other factors other than ones associated with logical processes. The preoperational child seems unable to understand the relationship between the whole and the part in a class inclusion task. However, some researchers have pointed out that out questions that children are asked during this task are unusual. Even slight variations in the wording of the questions that help clarify the meaning of the question can have positive effects on the child's performance. McGarrigle - quoted in donaldson 1978 - found that in a group of children aged 6 25% answered the standard piagetian question correctly. When it was rephrased 48% of the children were correct. Donaldson 1978 put forward a different reason from piaget for why young children performed poorly in conservation tasks. He stated that children build up a model of the world by formulating hypotheses that help them anticipate future events on the basis of past experience. The child, therefore , has expectations about any situation, and the child's interpretation of the words she hears will be influenced by the expectations she brings to a situation. In a conservation task, for example, Donaldson suggested that it is reasonable for a child to think that there must be a link between that action - changing the display - and the following question. Mcgarrigle and Donaldson 1974 explore this idea in the experiment that includes as a character called naughty teddy. It was the naughty teddy rather than the experimenter who muddled up the display and the changes are explained to the children as an accident. The child might have less expectation and there was no reason to believe that real change had taken place. They found that children were more likely to give the correct answer in this context rather than the classical education context. Piaget has also found that pre-operational children have difficulty with transitive influence influences. You should children two rods together. First A and B. A was longer than B. Then B and C. B was longer than C. Asked the children which was longer, A or C. Young children find such questions difficult and Piaget suggested that they cannot make logical inferences such as: if A is longer than b and b is longer than C then A must be longer than C. Bryant and Trabasso 1971 wondered if children's difficulties were less to do with making the influence and more to do with remembering all the information in the task. For children to make a correct response they not know they not only have to make an inference they also have to remember the length of all the rods they've seen. They thought it was possible that young children who have limited working memory capacity but unable to retain in memory all the information they needed for the task. They use a test similar to Piaget’s original task but before asking the children to carry out the task itself they train them to remember the lengths of the rods. Did not train them using rods A and C together but the children were trained on the other comparisons and you just remember that A was longer than B and that B was longer than C. They were asked the test question and they found that the children can now answer correctly.
Concrete operational stage - 7-11yrs. Children can use symbols representationally and manipulate them logically. Progressive decentring - by 6 or 7yrs a child can pass conservation tasks and their thinking is operational. The child can reason logically about changes made to objects and apply realistic principles and coordinate different perspectives. Can understand mass and length. However, they are reliant on the presence of concrete objects - they still lack abstract thinking - still tied to immediate experience. From about the age of 7 years children's thinking processes develop a new set of strategies that Piaget calls concrete operations. They're called concrete because children can apply them to immediately present objects. Thinking becomes...