STAT1103 Report Discussion PDF

Title STAT1103 Report Discussion
Course Introduction to Psychological Design and Statistics
Institution Macquarie University
Pages 2
File Size 78.3 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 55
Total Views 95

Summary

Download STAT1103 Report Discussion PDF


Description

Results 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Summary statistics What tests were used Subgroup demographics (extra demographic information) Assumption checking – met/not met Results of statistical analysis Summary

3, 2, 4, 6, 1, 5 Write in order that study was conducted in procedure - Results should follow similar structure First what participants looked like, to address hypothesis these tests were completed, check assumptions, statistical significance summary, summary of data & results of statistical analysis -

Won’t need any demographic groups in our

Discussion - Begins specific ends broad o Specific results of your findings and then broaden it by linking to others & practical implications etc - Begins recapping the focus and outlining whether the study’s results supported the hypotheses o First paragraph should be this o Reiterate research questions, clear statements on hypotheses were supported by results of the study o Copy and paste like in introduction - Interprets these findings o Generalising from specific results about contrasts in the populations o In uni population context o What does significant correlation mean?? o E.g. Self-reflection … nui setting those participating in self-reflection are likely to have academic resilience, if students were aiming for higher resilience … they could engage in self-reflective writing. - Relating results to previous findings & outlining contribution of results o Similarities and differences, between study’s and how reliable your study compared to theirs, consistent or inconsistent with past findings o Discuss why we found something different e.g. methodology or context differs  Experimental compared to holdworth interview  difference in methodology differing results  Cran et al  army population vs university population  context  Trying to understand why we got the results we got  Consistent with x&y studies and what that means??  Means  increases the reliability and validity of the results, strengthening the effect that has previously been identified - Strengths & Limitations

-

-

o 3 each is good to aim for but more important to do in depth and detail o Don’t list and identify, but explain why they are strengths & limitations?  What is the strength, why is it a strength, how does it strengthen results?  E.g. Addresses something other study’s don’t establish causation where others cannot, avoid using proof, confident that there is a positive effect …  Don’t use sample size as limitation  E.g. sample size, not representative of population, unable to link/generalise it to the wider population Suggestions highlights areas for future research o Do not list them off o DO NOT USE EXAMPLE  E.g. replicated with bigger sample size  What it is? Why should we do this next step of research? What you might find? o Based on … (our finding) future research should look to … How results can be applied o Employ self-reflection interventions more to increase resilience in students Summaries finishes with a concluding statement/paragraph o Statement or two, reiterate findings and what it means o A reiteration of the actual findings

Critical evaluation throughout discussion Tokenistic writing  shallow comments about different things, - D  not tokenistic How many paragraphs? – 5? APA Academic Writer...


Similar Free PDFs