T10 Reading An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance (Exam) PDF

Title T10 Reading An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance (Exam)
Author Ka Hei Chow
Course Introduction To Public Administration
Institution The University of Hong Kong
Pages 2
File Size 71.9 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 74
Total Views 133

Summary

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., and Balogh, S. 2012. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative
Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 22 (1): 1-29 ...


Description

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., and Balogh, S. 2012. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 22 (1): 1-29 Yiran Figure 1 (framework) + Table 1 (factors) Collaboration Dynamics: 3 components interact with each other → real policy change CGR: adapt to whole system context (macro socioeconomic conditions, law) ● ●

Understand figure one + table one Main framework of the CGR ○ How the model works ○ Inner box: collative governance regime ○ Difference between CGR and collaborative dynamics ■ Collaborative dynamics: 3 components ● Leads to real policy change in reality (whole process for drivers + dynamics lead to change in actions): CGR ● CGR can have impacts on the system context, need to adapt to the whole system context (e.g. macro socio-economic condition, legal context)

Table one: factor content ● Definition of each factors: e.g. what is leadership? ○ Analyse the case Presentation - Important - Definition: Engage people across boundaries of public agencies [Drivers] ● More drivers → CGR will be initiated more likely [Principle engagement] ● Effectiveness is determined by interactive processes [Shared motivation] ● Repeated and quality interactions → trust, mutual understanding, internal legitimacy, shared commitment among drivers ○ Generating and sustaining shared motivation [Capacity for joint action] ● Stimulate development of institutional arrangements, leadership, knowledge ● Necessary levels for four capacity are determined by CGR’s purpose, shared theory of action and targeted outcome ● Quality + extent of collaborative dynamics depends on production + self-reinforcing [Actions] ● Shared theory of action is identified explicitly



Collaborative dynamics function to generate the needed capacity for joint action

[Impacts] ● Specified impacts derived from shared theory [Adaptation] ● CGR will be more sustainable over time ●

Changes in context system → affect results of adoption

[Conclusion] ● Encompass wider range of collaborative initiatives ● Extends beyond typical focus on public sector + public manager to include public, private and civic sectors [Future research] Clarify how different components and elemts in the framework emerge...


Similar Free PDFs