Title | T10 Reading An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance (Exam) |
---|---|
Author | Ka Hei Chow |
Course | Introduction To Public Administration |
Institution | The University of Hong Kong |
Pages | 2 |
File Size | 71.9 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 74 |
Total Views | 133 |
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., and Balogh, S. 2012. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative
Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 22 (1): 1-29 ...
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., and Balogh, S. 2012. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 22 (1): 1-29 Yiran Figure 1 (framework) + Table 1 (factors) Collaboration Dynamics: 3 components interact with each other → real policy change CGR: adapt to whole system context (macro socioeconomic conditions, law) ● ●
Understand figure one + table one Main framework of the CGR ○ How the model works ○ Inner box: collative governance regime ○ Difference between CGR and collaborative dynamics ■ Collaborative dynamics: 3 components ● Leads to real policy change in reality (whole process for drivers + dynamics lead to change in actions): CGR ● CGR can have impacts on the system context, need to adapt to the whole system context (e.g. macro socio-economic condition, legal context)
Table one: factor content ● Definition of each factors: e.g. what is leadership? ○ Analyse the case Presentation - Important - Definition: Engage people across boundaries of public agencies [Drivers] ● More drivers → CGR will be initiated more likely [Principle engagement] ● Effectiveness is determined by interactive processes [Shared motivation] ● Repeated and quality interactions → trust, mutual understanding, internal legitimacy, shared commitment among drivers ○ Generating and sustaining shared motivation [Capacity for joint action] ● Stimulate development of institutional arrangements, leadership, knowledge ● Necessary levels for four capacity are determined by CGR’s purpose, shared theory of action and targeted outcome ● Quality + extent of collaborative dynamics depends on production + self-reinforcing [Actions] ● Shared theory of action is identified explicitly
●
Collaborative dynamics function to generate the needed capacity for joint action
[Impacts] ● Specified impacts derived from shared theory [Adaptation] ● CGR will be more sustainable over time ●
Changes in context system → affect results of adoption
[Conclusion] ● Encompass wider range of collaborative initiatives ● Extends beyond typical focus on public sector + public manager to include public, private and civic sectors [Future research] Clarify how different components and elemts in the framework emerge...