TERM Cases PDF

Preview

Summary

Download TERM Cases PDF

Description

Inntreprenuer pub co v east crown ltd

Helibut Symons & Co v Buckleton

i)

ii)

iii )

Lightman J : “ prima facie assumption that the written contract includes all the terms the parties wanted to be binding between them.” : ‘ the longer the interval between stm & ctr, the greater the presumption that parties didn’t intend stm to have contractual effect.’ Intention is determined objectively on a case to case basis by looking at the relative importance of each stm Exception : contractual cartography test Nb : this test Is not decisive test , intention of pty is deduced from totality of evidence.

Contractual cartography test Important attached test

Stm was so imp that pty wouldn’t have contracted if stm has not been maden Bannerman v White If representee expressly informs a representor of the significance of their rep to the ctr, the rep is likely to be viewed as amounting to contractually binding term. Couchman v Hill Representee specifically ask the representor to confirm a stm in a catalogue before the sale Pritchard v cook & red ltd Appropriate general test would therefore b to ask whether stm maker is taking personal responsibility for the stm. When the test is satisfy, this would be a factor indicating such personal responsibility. Hopkins v tanqueray Stm was not made in the same transaction of sale NO TERM Relative degree of knowledge between pty courts will consider whether the person making the statement had special skill or knowledge as compared to the other party if yes then the courts are more likely to infer that it was a term of the contract Oscar chess ltd v williams The courts held that the statement relating to the age of the car was not a term but a representation. The representee, Oscar Chess Ltd as a car dealer, had the greater knowledge and would be in a better position to know the age of the manufacture than the defendant. Dick bentley production ltd v harold smith The courts held that the statement was a term. ltd ( clf oscar) Mr Smith as a car dealer had greater expertise and the claimant relied upon that expertise. Pritchard v cook & red ltd Diff from oscar as def has clearly taken responsibility by copying details into his own paper & not issuing a disclaimer. Was stm induced into writing ? Depends on wholly written or partly Wholly written

in which case if the term was not part of the written contract it would not be regarded as a

term this written contract failed to mention the date of the motorcycle model in which case it is still possible for the statement to be a term the statements were made with the intention of influencing the buyer to act on it. Start of negotiations/ shortly be4 ctr concluded

Routledge v mckay Partly oral partly written Birch v paramount estates iv )

Time of statement made -Start of negotiations

such statements are more likely to be taken to have been made to further negotiations and therefore not terms where there was a long interval between the time the statement was made and the time the contract was entered into. such statements are more likely to be treated as a term of the contact The trial judge held that the oral statement by the defendant was part of the terms of the contract because it was made ‘at the time of the sale’.

Routledge v mckay

-shortly be4 ctr concluded Schawel v reade

v)

Accepting responsibility or advising on verification Schawel v reade

Ecay v godfrey

vi )

where the defendant’s statement that the plaintiff need not look for anything …. was crucial in the court holding the statement to be a term. the defendant’s advice to the claimant that he ought have the sail boat properly surveyed prior to purchase, was held to indicate generally to the reasonable objective person that his assessment of the ship’s quality was not expert or definite, even where the person making the representation had a comparatively larger knowledge of ships than the other party.

One party clearly relied on the other Esso petroleum co ltd v mardon

Breach of term the claimant is entitled to damages on the basis of expectation loss the contract can only be set aside in cases where the term breached is a condition of the contract. set aside only prospectively

This is indicative that stm intended to be a term

Assessment of damages

Ability to set aside a ctr

Meaning of set aside

Misrep the claimant is entitled to damages on the basis of reliance loss the contract can always be set aside

set aside both retrospectively and prospectively

i)

Express term Written parol evidence rule

Jacobs v batavia & general plantations trust ltd Henderson v arthur

Shogun finance ltd v hudson

a) b)

Exceptions Allen v pink

c)

Whr ctr was intended to be partly oral & partly written, PER doesn’t apply. J evans & son ltd v andrea merzario ltd

d) e) f)

PER is also admissible to prove Gillespie bros & co v cheney eggar & co Hutton v warren

g)

Cambell discount co v gil

h) i)

Pym v campbell

j)

Mann v Nunn

ii)

Bound by sign in absence of fraud or misrep L’estrange v E. graucob ltd

a)

Curtis v chemical cleaning & dyeing co Exceptions : The doc must 1st be contractual in nature Grogan v robin meredith plant hire

Written / oral Can the courts go beyond the written agreement in an attempt to discover the existence of additional terms to the contract GR : once a contract has been reduced into writing, as a general rule parties cannot adduce extrinsic evidence to add, subtract, vary or contradict the written contract Aim = to promote certainty Lord Hobhouse : relied on PER as basis 4 concluding that it was not possible to go outside the term of written offer of the hire purchase ctr Where the written agreement was not intended to contain the whole agreement

Roskil LJ : crt is entitled to look at & shd look at all evidence from start to finish in orser to see the intention between ptys Terms which must be implied into the contract A custom which must be implied into the contract To show that the contract is invalid on grounds of misrepresentations, mistake, fraud or non est factum (this is not my deed) To show that doc should be rectify To show that the contract has not yet come into existence or that it has ceased to operate To prove the existence of a collateral agreement

Scrutton LJ : when a doc containing contractual terms is signed, then in absence of fraud or misrep, the pty signing is bound & it is wholly immaterial whether he has read doc or not. Thr was misrep which induce C to sign. Where it was not, pty signing doc will not be entrapped by his sign. The courts held that a timesheet would not be regarded by a reasonable person as a document likely to contain contractual terms. It was merely an administrative device.

b)

Where the sign has been procured by fraud, misrep or whr the defence of non est factum is made out

Saunders v Anglia Building Society; Norwich & Peterborough BS v Steed (No 2)

Non est factum – originally applied in cases where an illiterate person signed the deed. The defence however will not apply where an innocent party has relied on the C’s signature to his detriment Relate to non est factum

Incorporation of written terms 1.

3 rules Notice of terms must be given at or be4 the conclusion of ctr Olley v marlborough court ltd Thornton v shoe land parking ltd

2.

Terms must be contained or referred in a doc which was intended to have contractual effect Chaleton v barry UDC Burnett v westmnister bank ltd Taylor v glasgow corp NB : whether a doc has CE is a question of fact to be decided, based on current commercial or consumer practises Alexander v railway executive

3.

R steps must be taken to bring terms to the attention of the pty Thompson v london midland and scottish railway co

a)

NB : if the pty knows that recipient cant read the notice, more would need to be done to satisfy notice requirement Geier v kujawa Weston & warner bros ( transport ) Insufficient notice to incorporate doc : Henderson v stevenson

b)

Richardson, spence & co ltd v rowntree

c)

Sugar v london midland & scotland railway

d)

Poseidon freight forwarding co ltd v davies

crucial to determine the precise moment the contract was concluded Notice exempting Marlborough from liability came too late. The notice inside the premises and even the notice on the ticket came too late.

Ticket was not expected to have contractual terms Cheque book Ticker

the court noted that ‘most people nowadays know that railway companies have conditions subject to which they take articles into their cloakrooms’

There is however no need for the other party to actually be aware of the terms as long as R steps taken

Relate to nb Same as above a ticket made no reference to the existence of conditions on the back a ticket was folded over and the conditions partially obscured by a red ink stamp the relevant clause was obscured by a date stamp reference was made to terms ‘on the back’ of a

turner southern ltd NB : whr pty seeks to enforce onerous or unusual term, it is not enough just to give notice of their existence. He must show that he took extra steps as were R to bring their significance to the other pty’s notice Spurling ltd v bradshaw

Interfoto picture library ltd v stiletton visual programmes ltd

NB : it is not always clear whether a term is onerous AEG Ltd v Logic Resource Ltd

faxed document, but the back page was inadvertently not sent

some clauses need to be printed in red ink on the face of the document with a red hand pointing to it before the notice could be held to be sufficient. it was held that the onus is on the party seeking to enforce a particularly onerous or unusual to show that the term was brought to the attention of the other party

Relate to NB

Incorporation of written terms ( thru course of dealing ) McCutcheon v David Mcbrayne Ltd Petrotrade inc v texaco ltd Ques of fact to determine Henry Kandall Ltd v William Lilico Ltd Hollier v rambler motors ltd NB : whr both ptys are commercial ptys with equal bargaining power, 2 previous transactions & trade customs , sufficient to amount to COD British crane hire corporation ltd v ipswich

HOL : there must have been regular and consistent course of dealings 5 crt within 13 months 100 contracts in 3 years ( regular ) c/f below 3 or 4 contracts over 5 years ( not regular )

Relate to NB...