Title | Chapter 2 Notes |
---|---|
Course | Fundamentals of Australian Law |
Institution | Western Sydney University |
Pages | 10 |
File Size | 188 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 105 |
Total Views | 146 |
Chapter 2 textbook...
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SOURCES OF LAW PRIMARY: is a document in which you can find the law itself, SOURCES include: legislation (statutes, Acts of parliament), delegated legislation (rules, regulations, orders and by- laws of bodies to whom parliament has delegated authority), c ourt judgements SECONDARY: is something that could be used, or taken into account, by those who make statutes or decide cases. SOURCES include: international law, especially treaties rati ed by Australia, law reform commission reports, a cademic commentary— journal articles, books and conference papers. LEGISLATION Legislation, in the form of a statute, also referred to as an Act of parliament, is a primary source of law LEGISLATION- MAKING AUTHORITY - Each of the 9 parliaments in Australia has the authority to pass legislation and that authority comes from the Australian Constitution (in the case of Federal Parliament), the state constitutions (in the case of the state parliaments) and self- governing legislation (in the case of the territories) - The legislation of each of the nine parliaments in Australia is an authoritative source of law. - One consequence of having a federation is that each individual is covered simultaneously by state or territory and federal legislation. - In situations where the applicable state legislation is inconsistent with the applicable federal legislation, the federal legislation will prevail, and the state law will be invalid to the extent of the inconsistency - Commonwealth legislative supremacy is guaranteed by s 109 of the Commonwealth Constitution. Commonwealth Acts can, however, be invalidated where the parliament did not have the legislative power (under the Constitution) to enact the legislation. E.g of where the High Court of Australia declared a territory law to be invalid due to inconsistency with federal law is Commonwealth v Australian Capital Territory deemed void and would not be recognised by Au LEGISLATION AS A PREFERED SOURCE OF LAW - Most law was created in England through the courts. - Legislation is now the dominant source of law - Indeed, there is so much legislation that parliaments cannot cope with the workload and
must delegate the power to legislate to other bodies with expertise in each particular area + do not have the capacity to review and update each piece of legislation every year - So why has legislation now become the preferred form of regulation in our legal system? 1. First, unlike courts, which have to wait for a dispute that raises particular issues of law before they can address them, parliament is a self- starting agent for legal change— it can pass new legislation, or amend or repeal existing legislation, at any time = It can be proactive, where courts can only be reactive. 2. Second, courts are retrospective , in that they are limited to resolving disputes arising from past conduct, while parliaments can make new law that has a future, or prospective, effect 3. Third, if there is an inconsistency between statute and common law, the statute will prevail. This is in keeping with the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty— as parliament’s key role is to make law, it prevails over law- making effoorts by the courts and the executive FUNCTIONS OF LEGISLATION - Legislation may be used to make new law, repeal old law, or codify existing law. - Making new law may be done to override what parliament considers to be unsatisfactory common law, OR to cover an emerging area that has not yet been subject to law— this happens with new technologies such as DNA testing - Repealing old law means removing laws which are no longer necessary. - Codifying e xisting law means bringing together the law in a particular area— which may presently be spread throughout a number of cases and statutes— into the one statute: easier for interested people to nd the law on that particular area, and it gives parliament the chance to streamline and improve the structure and operation of the law + serves to both clarify and simplify the law CREATING NEW LEGISLATION - It essentially involves a bill being passed through both houses of parliament, except in the ACT, NT, QLD where parliament is unicameral (one house) compared to NSW with a bicameral system (two houses). Once passed the Act then goes for assent to the Governor. COMMENCEMENT OF LEGISLATION - The general rule for NSW is that legislation comes into force 28 days from the date of assent unless the legislation itself says otherwise. - To determine when an Act comes into force, you usually n eed to check the actual wording o f the statute itself. - If it does not have a commencement provision, you need to check the date of assent, which should be stated in the Act, and apply the relevant rule set out above, depending on which parliament has enacted the legislation.
- If the statute does have a commencement provision, it will either specify an actual date upon which the legislation comes into force, or it will say that it commences on a date to be proclaimed. FEATURE
DESCRIPTION
NUMBER
Each Act has a number that includes the year e.g Act No. 116, meaning that it was the 116th act of that year for the Commonwealth Parliament
DATE
- The date the Act was assented to is usually given in square brackets - Useful to check whether the Act was in force at the time of the relevant conduct or event (and to do this requires checking the commencement provision - assented to on the 26th August 2015
LONG TITLE
- States the purpose of the Act, which can be useful when interpreting the statute e.g usually begins with ‘An Act to’ or ‘An Act for’
SHORT TITLE
- Usually contained in the rst section of the Act
PREAMBLE
Explains why the parliament has decided to enact legislation on the relevant topic. The above Act has quite a lengthy preamble, setting out parliament’s views on the longer term importance of medical research and innovation.
PARTS AND DIVISIONS
- Sections may be grouped into logical parts to make it easier for the reader to follow → an Act may be divided into chapters, which contain parts, and the parts may have divisions (and in some cases subdivisions), which contain the sections.
OBJECTS OR PURPOSE SECTION
Sums up the overall purpose in one sentence
SIMPLIFIED OUTLINE
- Introduction of a simplified outline has made legislation easier to read and understand. - It provides a useful overview of the legislation and the way it is structured, and some useful background and context, in a less formal tone and style than the substantive sections themselves - As the reader, it can guide you as you consider what you can skim over and what you should look at more closely
INTERPRETATION OR DEFINITIONS SECTION
- Interpretation: glossary in a book, or the ‘key terms’ section at the start of each chapter of this book within the legislation
FOOTNOTES, END - Can be used for the sake of explanation or to make the Act more NOTES, MARGIN NOTES user- friendly
SCHEDULES
- Schedules follow the main sections of the Act, and are usually used for detailed information in table form, or long lists
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDA
- Parliaments in an age where statutes are interpreted in the light of their purpose, and where statutes aim to be drafted in plain English language to make them comprehensible to non- lawyers
DELEGATED LEGISLATION - Parliament have the authority to delegate the authority to make law, and parliaments often do this where the main Act covers the law, and they want the relevant government ministry to devise suitable regulations that give effect to the Act. - In practice it is the relevant government department, consulting with the Office of Parliamentary Counsel, that develops the delegated legislation and advises the minister on its acceptance and implementation e.g Road safety legislation → Parliament may create a statutory body, such as a roads and transport authority, and may give it the power to make laws necessary or convenient to give effective application to the Act BENEFITS and CRITICISIMS OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION - It is quicker and cheaper than going through the formal parliamentary processes - Reduces pressure on parliament - Enables more complex pieces of legislation to be created by those with specic expertise. - It is not subject to the same level of parliamentary democracy or parliamentary scrutiny asabill - It is often passed in secret and public does not have the capacity to scrutinise it or lobby against it— in fact people often don’t even know it has been passed until it comes in effect - It offends the doctrine of separation of powers because it involves government ministers (the executive) makinglaw - Makes it difficult to locate the law, because the primary legislation and regulations are in separate sets of rules. This can be bewildering for members of the public who may have a concern about the operation of the legislation but are unable to nd the law in the legislation because the detail is in the regulations. - Typically there is a committee of members that scrutinises delegated legislation, and if in its opinion the delegated legislation is problematic— perhaps because it breaches some fundamental principle— the committee can recommend that it be disallowed or redrafted. - Parliament usually has a limited time in which to disallow delegated legislation after it has been tabled in parliament. The exact number of days varies between six and 18 days at the federal level. In New South Wales it is 15 days; - In NSW, VIC and SA, delegated legislation commences on the day it is made unless the delegated legislation itself provides otherwise - Parliament is able, at any time, to repeal delegated legislation.
- If there is any inconsistency between a piece of delegated legislation and primary legislation— that is, between a regulation and an Act of parliament— the Act will prevail AMENDING LEGISLATION - Legislation is amended by passing a new piece of legislation that contains amendments to the older Act. - Typically the title of such legislation is the same short title plus the word ‘Amendment’. - If the amendment is specically focused, the title of the amending legislation often includes a phrase in brackets to clarify the specic purpose of the amendment. - There can also be ‘omnibus’ amending legislation, which is one Act that amends a number of dierent Acts REPEALING LEGISLATION - Some legislation is automatically repealed as a result of a ‘sunset clause’ in the legislation— a clause which says that the Act has force for a denite period, or until a certain date. - Other legislation is repealed by a newer piece of legislation that names a certain Act or Acts and states that they are hereby repealed. - An Act may also be impliedly repealed if a new piece of legislation is enacted that is inconsistent with it, such that it would be impossible for both Acts to apply. This is less common today, as parliament's attempt to avoid confusion by expressly stating if an Act is to be repealed or not - Effect of repealed Act no longer has force - it still was valid law for the time it was in force. This means that rights and liabilities accrued under the legislation while it was in force may still be the subject of litigation before the courts. - However, if the legislation that repealed the former legislation is itself repealed, this does not revive the former legislation CASE - Judicial decisions— or cases , or precedents— are a source of law in our common law system. - They may be common law cases (cases in which the legal principles themselves have developed across a number of decisions in an area where there was no relevant legislation on point) OR they may be case law (in which courts interpret legislation). AUTONOMY OF A CASE
- A case (judgment) contains the following main parts PART
DESCRIPTION
CITATION *Parts of citation: Title, Year, Law report
- It is a unique identifier that should enable the holder to locate the exact case. TITLE: consists of the names of the parties. e.G ‘v’ in the title is pronounced as ‘and’ or ‘against’, not ‘versus’; that is, ‘Smith and Jones’ (common in civil cases) or ‘Crown against Jones’ (common in criminal cases), NOT ‘Smith versus Jones’. - The party initiating the action is named first , and the responding party (or parties) is named second e.g let’s say Smith is the plaintiff and Jones is the defendant. - If Jones then appeals the decision, the title of the case in the appellate court will be Jones v Smith. is is because the party initiating the action is named first, and Jones initiated the appeal. If Smith appeals from that decision, the title will become Smith v Jones again YEAR: this is the year the decision was reported , which is usually the same as the year of judgment. - If the year is written in square brackets, it means the law reports it is reported in are bound by the year, so there will be a 2014 volume that you can locate. - If the year is written in round brackets, it means the law reports are bound by volume, from one upwards, and there may be more than one volume in each particular year. LAW REPORT: This will include the name of the law reports, the volume and the page reference. In our hypothetical case example, it is volume 215 of the Queensland Law Reports (QLR).
COURT
- Includes not only the name of the relevant court, but the judge(s) who sat to hear the case. For example, our case would say ‘Supreme Court of Queensland’ and ‘Williams J’, which means it was heard before a single judge (if three judges had been listed, then we would say it was being heard before a Full Court)
DATE
- The date on which judgment in the case was handed down.
HEADNOTE
- Legal publishers arrange with lawyers or law graduates to write a brief note summarising the case. - Usually the headnote will give a short summary of the facts, and the court’s decision in the case. This is not socially part of the case itself, but is used by those who want a quick overview to see if the case is relevant, in which event they will read the whole case. - It is risky to rely on the headnote alone, without satisfying yourself that the
case really covers the legal point you think it does. LEGAL REP
- Common for judgments to list the main solicitor and barrister(s) who ran the case on behalf of each party. is does not usually appear in the reported (printed) judgment, but is included for example on AustLII.
JUDGEMENT
- If there is only one judge, there will be only one judgment, which will start with the judge’s name, e.g ‘Williams J:…’. If there are three judges, there may still be only one joint judgment, in which case it will begin with all of their names, e.g ‘Williams, Brown and Adams JJ:…’. - Judgments are usually written in a logical order, with the facts, then the legal issues, then the analysis, and then the order that the court has made, but they tend to have few headings, and they do not have an ‘executive summary’ or ‘synopsis’ at the beginning. - However, lengthy judgments, usually by superior courts, are increasingly written with headings, to the relief of many a lawyer and law student. - Reported judgments also often have footnotes with details of sources used and cases cited.
WRITING A CASE NOTE A case note is a written summary and analysis of a case, which enables the reader, without having to read the whole judgment themselves, to know about the case, the reasoning and outcome, how it affects the relevant area of law and its signicance generally. It has two distinct parts— a case summary and a case analysis. - Case summary— this sets out the formal details of the case, including the citation, the court and the procedural history, along with the facts, the issues, and an outline of the court’s reasoning and orders made. - Case analysis— t his contains comments on the case, critiquing the judgments made in the case in the context of other cases in this area, considering whether the case is likely to open up the law or narrow it, and the signicance of the case when looked at from various perspectives (e.g. social, political, ethical, moral). A good case summary must ensure it has the following: 1. Citation 2. Court (name of court _ judges who heard the case) 3. Procedural history (this will give you a snapshot of where the case has come from) 4. Facts ( all the facts, only the material facts) 5. Issues: h ere is where you identify each of the legal issues raised in the case,
6. Reasoning/decision ( is a summary of the court’s reasoning in answering each of the issues identified) - If there is more than one issue in the case, and you have numbered the issues, then it is useful to number the court’s analysis on each of those issues. is way, if you are returning to the case note to only look at one issue, it will be easy to locate that issue and the court’s analysis of i 7. Ratio— the ratio decidendi of the case is the answer to the main issue(s) in the case, and so in most instances the section above on reasoning/ decision will contain a statement of the ratio. - However, it can be useful to restate it in as short and clear a sentence as you can, as this will help when you refer back to the case note. e.g ‘You take the victim as you nd them, including not only physical susceptibilities, but also religious convictions’. 8. Obiter— if there was some useful discussion in passing by the court, it may be useful to refer to it here, and put in brackets the place in the judgment where the discussion can be found, in case you want to refer back to it. E.g in a case where the plainti has been injured by slipping on the oor of the defendant’s premises (where there was no warning sign), the court may state in obiter, ‘Had the defendant placed a warning sign on the slippery floor, she may not have been liable for breaching her duty of care to the plaintfi’. • Order— this will simply state what was held. For example, ‘e appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent’s cost SECONDARY SOURCES Secondary sources are documents that courts may use to guide their decisions, and that parliament may take into account in drafting legislation; that is, secondary sources are resources that courts and parliaments use to create primary sources of law. LAW REFORM COMMISSION REPORTS - The aim of the law reform commission is to have an expert body dedicated to considering reform of existing laws. - This is particularly important where parliament is busy creating new law, and areas of law reform may need input from those with technical expertise or lived experience of the law and free from the vicissitudes of party politics - At the federal level, the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC), which was established in 1975, is regulated by the Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996 (Cth). - It is an independent statutory corporation that conducts ‘references’ (inquiries) into areas of potential law reform at the request of the Commonwealth Attorney- General. - It undertakes research and receives submissions, and ultimately provides a report to the Attorney- General containing recommendations for reform.
- Although many of the topics of law reform are federal laws, the ALRC also considers areas for harmonisation of state and territory laws, to promote a national approach. - Topics that have been addressed include privacy, consumer prot...