Face to face classes versus Modular distance learning Compare and Contrast PDF

Title Face to face classes versus Modular distance learning Compare and Contrast
Author Kimberly Anne Manalili
Course Medical Laboratory Science
Institution Angeles University Foundation
Pages 1
File Size 26 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 83
Total Views 157

Summary

Reading & Writing essay...


Description

Face to face classes versus Modular distance learning

The COVID-19 pandemic urges government officials to implement extreme protocols such as lockdowns that lead to the closure of establishments and schools to limit or control its transmission. As a result, they cease the face-to-face classes and resort to the establishment of distance learning. Face-to-face classes are the traditional form where there is a physical interaction with the students and teachers. Distance learning is an alternative form where students and teachers do not meet physically, and learning commences through self-directed learning from online or through modular. These forms of learning are similar in some ways but still contain differences that define them from each other. Face-to-face classes and distance learning, specifically the modular, are forms of education that involve both students and teachers that gauge the knowledge acquired by students. It also portrays the willingness of the students to learn and improve as they engage with the learning activities given. Both forms may test the attention span of students to learning, especially those who can be easily distracted, wherein for face-to-face classes, the students may be subjected to a lot of distractions from their peers, while for modular, the presence of gadgets and other activities may distract them from studying. For the differences, the face-to-face classes use two-way learning where there is a live interaction between students and teachers with ease in the communication. Furthermore, it is structured as there is a scheduled time for each subject to attend and follow; therefore, there is uniformity with their pacing. Modular distance learning, on the other hand, utilizes one-way learning and is more flexible. The students have the freedom to choose which time they prefer to do and accomplish their modules, as they are readily available anytime but with a specific deadline to meet. However, teachers cannot attend promptly to the questions, and they hardly communicate with each other. In conclusion, face-to-face classes and modular distance learning can be beneficial to the students and the teachers. Their similarities mainly focus on the learnings or the knowledge acquired, while the differences emphasize their pros and cons towards the ways of executing them. Either way, as long as the students get to learn and improve, any of the two will do. Its effectiveness and efficiency will always depend on the willingness of the students to learn....


Similar Free PDFs