Group Reflection Journal PDF

Preview

Summary

Download Group Reflection Journal PDF

Description

OB Teamwork Self-reflection Paper Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate your understanding of effective teamwork, your ability/skill to work effectively in a team, as well as personal growth and learning.

Instructions 

Reflect on your team project experience in this course as follows:

1. The Team Process (Not individuals working in a group)  The Team’s Effectiveness  The Team’s Ineffectiveness  Recommendations (What the TEAM should continue, stop and start doing next time)

2. Your Individual Contribution (to the Team Process, Focus on you!)  Your Effectiveness in Contributing to the Success of the TEAM  Your Ineffectiveness in Contributing to the Success of the TEAM  Recommendations (What YOU can continue, stop and start doing next time)



Consider a minimum of 3 of the following topics/theories in your reflection above: o Perception & Perceptual Errors o Communication & Communication Barriers o Personality o Power o Values o Conflict & Negotiation o Culture & Cultural Dimensions o Team Culture o Motivation (Self-Efficacy, Goalo Norms, Roles Setting, Maslow’s, Expectancy, o Decision-making Equity Theory, Justice Theory…) o Creativity o 5 Stage Team Development Model o Leadership



The self-reflection paper should demonstrate: o Application of theory to understand your personal experiences o Examples to support understanding, insights and arguments o Thoughtful, in-depth reflection o Evidence of personal growth and learning o Original ideas, content, thoughts and perspectives based on your own experience



The parameters include: o 1,000-1,5000 words in length (excluding title page and bibliography) o Chicago-style citations, if applicable o Professional formatting, including headings, title page and bibliography, if applicable o Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation o Marks will be deducted for unprofessional language and formatting, as well as grammar, spelling and punctuation errors



Evaluation criteria: See rubrics on the following page for detailed breakdown.

OB Teamwork Self-reflection Paper Rubrics Pts 10

9

8 7

6

5

4

3

Criteria Comprehensive and in-depth reflection on and pers onalization of OB theories and concepts; reflection demonstrates meaningful insight and growth from team project experience; all key points are thoughtfully and thoroughly addressed; reflections are profound, and are fully supported with clear, detailed and meaningful examples as applicable. Thorough and in-depth reflection on and personalization of OB theories and concepts; reflection demonstrates meaningful insight and growth from team project experience; all key points are fully addressed; reflections are insightful and well supported with clear, meaningful examples as applicable. Thorough reflection on and personalization of OB theories and concepts; reflection demonstrates valuable insight and growth from team project experience; all key points are addressed; reflections are meaningful and supported with clear, detailed examples as applicable. Appropriate reflection on and personalization of OB theories and concepts; reflection shows some insight and learning from team project experience; all key points are addressed; reflections are supported with clear, detailed examples as applicable. General reflection on and personalization of OB theories and concepts; some insight and growth from team project experience may be demonstrated; key points are addressed but all may not be fully developed; reflections are supported with examples as applicable. Very basic reflection on and personalization of OB theories and concepts; minimal demonstration of growth and learning; key points are addressed but some may be superficially or minimally analyzed; some reflections are supported with examples but others are not. Inadequate reflection on and personalization of OB theories, concepts; minimal or no growth from team project experience demonstrated; not all key points are considered; viewpoints and interpretations may be unsupported or supported with flawed arguments; examples, when applicable, may not be provided or are irrelevant to the assignment. Minimal reflection on and personalization of OB theories and concepts; no demonstrated learning from team project experience; key points are missing; viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported or supported with flawed arguments; examples, when applicable, are not provided or are irrelevant to the assignment.

2

Lack of reflection on or personalization of OB theories and concepts; reflection and insights are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported; examples, when applicable, are not provided.

1

Response demonstrates a lack of understanding of assignment requirements; key points are not discussed; reflection and insights are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported; examples, when applicable, are not provided

Section 1: The Team Process

Score Out of 10

The Team’s Effectiveness, Ineffectiveness, & Recommendations Section 2: Your Individual Contribution (to the Team Process, Focus on you!) Your Individual Effectiveness, Ineffectiveness and Recommendations for Contributing to the Success of the TEAM

Total Score 20 Points (Worth 10%)

Note: Unprofessional language and formatting, as well as incorrect English grammar, spelling and punctuation will result in a point penalty of max. 5 points....