Indivisually productive chickens only achived success by supressing productivy of rest PDF

Preview

Summary

enjoy...

Description

Indivisually productive chickens only achived success by supressing productivy of rest Success is achieved by picking best of best and giving them best resources? If above is true we need to find better way to live and richer way to live. What mmakes some more productive than others? MIT- high schieving groups 3/ 1- High degrees of social sensitivity to others 2/ GAVE roughky equally time to each other 3/ had more women ( MIT ) -

Social connectiveness to each other What happens between people really counts Ideas flow and grow.

E.g Arrow- engeering firms. Culture of helpfulness Helpfulness- have to work among people who give and get help – don’t need indivisual prowess Not technology – people getting to know each other chemistry works! Cultural of helpness- core to success not . Don’t have to know all work among helpful people. -

Comapines ban coffe desks- hang out around machine- ‘’collective restoration’’. -FICA

People too focused in her company- once got to know each work mmore productive. Don’t need one Chciken IDEAX-vegetable gardens- people work together? – Going gets tough people need social support and who to ask for help. What motivates people is bonds. Attuned groups allowed smooth idea flow HELPFULLNESS IS CENTRAL TO SUCCESS. Work with people who can give and get help. Any 17 mins. No high tec company think stech issue Social capital – reliance an sintedepency that builds trust – gives companies momentum and makes them robust- meaning time is everything. Social capital compunds with time. Trust tales time. Time builds value. Synchrinsed companies coffe breaks. Stock up 50%. Good ideas – great . Ideas grow through social capital support. Like a baby. IN top companies no one person- team people give each other. No need to be super chiken! Money erodes social connectiveness Montreal Protocol- CFC. One team 3 principles -

No starts ever1 needed valid perspetve One stanadrs best imagninable 3rd he had to but out because power

-this group cracked it first- most succesfull environmental agreement ever implemented. Problems need every1 not one superman. When all value than liberate value – best outcome People enjoy working with other smart people and respect each other’s experience and find this culture more motivating. The high achieving groups were not dominated by one or two “Super Chickens”. that teams are hampered by problems of co-ordination and motivation that chip away at the benefits of collaboration Time to talk – 500 million up ad employ satisfaction 0 synced coffee breaks – social capital Weneedt or edefinel eader shi pasanact i vi t yi nwhi chcondi t i onsar ecr eat edwher epeopl ecan dot hei rmostcour ageoust hi nki ngt oget her . "

Companies don’t have ideas-mpeople do HER company ONLY WHEN PEOPLE knoew each other CHEMISTRY IS CORE Collective restoration- coffee breaks together Social support- people need to know who to ask for help and bonds between people motivate them to seek help Margeret Hefferman. Ideas grow like baby- generous contritubion faith and challenge ( of parent who brings them up) they achieve potential Auditoin royal adcacmy art London- teachers looked for what happened between students not one pyrotechniq Produces of hit album- lots of satrs but collaberaters last longers cuz bringing out best in others is how they find best in themselves She visited companies renowned for ingenuity- no superstars all mattered People she worked with- how uch we could give each other Leadershop – ever1 can do most courages thinking together Gardening things Social connection facilitates productivity...