Introductory Psychology PDF

Title Introductory Psychology
Author Mia Ottaviano
Course Introductory Psychology
Institution Tulane University
Pages 17
File Size 608 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 72
Total Views 137

Summary

Professor William Billingsley Jr, PhD...


Description

Tulane University Fall Semester 2021 Instructor: William Billingsley Jr, PhD Email: [email protected]

INTRODUCTORY PSYCHOLOGY ___

Notes Psychology: An Overview and Brief History What is Psychology? -

Psychology is the scientific study of the behavior of humans and other animals

The Goals of Psychology -

We study psychology in order to understand, explain, and predict behavior -

What are some “real-world” examples of behaviors we would want to understand, explain, and predict?

Becoming a Psychologist -

Psychology is an academic, non-medical discipline -

Educational requirements can vary

-

Being a “psychologist” requires a graduate degree -

Master’s degree = 2-3 years

-

Ph.D./Psy.D. = 4-7+ years

-

State licensure requirements

Studying Psychology -

Who should study psychology? -

Excellent major or topic of study for anyone interested in: -

Directly helping people -

Social work, public health, education, therapy

-

Business

-

Law

-

Advertising

-

Coaching

-

Just about anything involving people or behavior

What Psychologists (Really) Do -

Being a “psychologist” can mean a lot of different things -

Provide services to individuals -

Clinical Psychologist -

Advanced degrees in psychology (PhD or PsyD); help people with mental and emotional problems; use psychological testing to diagnose/treat

-

Sample issues: anxiety, depression, child behavior problems, schizophrenia, forensic/legal issues (forensic psychologist)

-

-

Other individual service providers who are not psychologists -

Clinical social worker

-

Master’s level therapist

-

Psychiatrist (MD with residency in psychiatry; prescribe drugs)

Provide services to organizations/groups -

Industrial/Organizational Psychologist -

Study behavior in the workplace to help organizations

-

Can use social, cognitive, and motivational psychology principles to describe and explain workplace behavior

-

Sample issue: How to improve company morale or productivity?

Ergonomist or Human Factors Specialist -

Facilitates design of machinery and equipment so the average user can operate them efficiently and safely

-

Sample issue: How can a computer workstation be designed to minimize repetitive stress injuries?

-

School Psychologist -

Assesses students in grades K-12

-

Uses developmental, learning, and motivational principles and educational and psychological tests to create plans for individual students

-

Sample issue: Does a student’s declining grades indicate the presence of a learning disability or an emotional problem?

-

Conduct research

-

Teach

Where Psychologists Work

Types of Psychologists -

Biological psychology

-

Clinical psychology

-

Cognitive psychology

-

Community psychology

-

Counseling psychology

-

Cultural psychology

-

Developmental psychology

-

Educational psychology

-

Environmental psychology

-

Evolutionary psychology

-

Forensic psychology

-

Health psychology

-

Industrial/organizational

-

Learning and motivation

-

Personality psychology

-

Positive psychology

-

Quantitative psychology

-

School psychology

-

Social psychology

-

Sport psychology

(Some) Intellectual Roots of Psychology -

Scientific -

Scholasticism: the law of parsimony (Occam’s Razor) William of Occam (1290-1350)

-

Inductive Reasoning: from specific observations to a general conclusion or hypothesis (Francis Bacon, 1561-1626; also linked to skepticism of dogma and authority)

-

Deductive Reasoning: from general conclusion to prediction of specifics or test of hypothesis (Galileo, 1564-1642)

-

Physiological -

Psychophysics and the just noticeable difference: Ernst Heinrich Weber (1795-1878) and Gustav Fechner (1801-1887)

-

Nerve induction and vitalism: Hermann von Helmholtz (1821-1894) measured the speed of the nerve impulse

-

A pathway to neuroscience

Evolutionary -

Natural selection as a mechanism for evolution

-

Charles Darwin (1809-1882)

-

A pathway to testing & measurement, comparative animal behavior, and evolutionary psychology

-

Philosophical -

-

British empiricism: the mind is passive, a “tabula rasa” (blank slate) -

John Locke (1632-1704)

-

Emphasis on how experience and the environment shape the individual

-

Basis of the “Nurture” position in Nature/Nurture debates

-

Pathway to development, learning, and behaviorism

Rationalism: the mind is an active agent with innate components -

Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716)

-

A pathway to cognitive psychology

Major Historical Frameworks -

Structuralism (1879) -

Key Figure: Wilhem Wundt (1832-1920)

-

Goal: By analogy with chemistry, psychology should describe the fundamental components, or structures, of mental experience

-

Method: Experimental introspection, AKA experimental self-observation

-

Wundt’s lab at the University of Leipzig in 1879 is often considered the origin of modern scientific psychology

-

The approach focused upon sensation and perception, where perhaps some progress was made (e.g., components of taste include bitter, sweet, salty, sour)

-

-

But the method approach was ultimately unproductive due to multiple issues -

Introspection itself altered experience

-

Researchers obtained different results

-

The framework offered no solutions to problems of everyday life

Functionalism (1890) -

Key Figure: William James

-

Goal: Informed by Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection, psychology should describe how mental processes help people adapt

-

Method: Collect data from observations of humans and animals

-

An emphasis on individual differences and how they inform behvior

-

A focus on practical application, with intent to help people function better in day-to-day life

-

Published influential textbook, The Principles of Psychology, in 1890

Psychoanalysis (1900) -

Key Figure: Sigmund Freud

-

Goal: Understand personality as a product of largely unconscious processes, particularly dynamic conflicts involving hidden urges (usually sexual), early family experiences, and societal demands; apply this understanding in a clinical setting. Also known as the psychodynamic approach.

-

Method: Case study and patient observation; talk therapy; little in the way of experimental research

-

Groundbreaking for promoting the notion of the unconscious

-

Helped legitimize the study of human sexuality

-

Psychoanalysis still continues as a clinical practice

-

Widely criticized for lack of empirical rigor; considered pseudoscientific in some quarters

-

Behaviorism (1913) -

Key Figures: John Watson & B.F. Skinner

-

Goal: The proper focus of psychology is the study of observable behavior, which is understood to be the product of environmental determinants (reinforcers).

-

Method: Lab-based experimentation, often involving animal models

-

Dismissed structuralism and introspective techniques as too subjective: treated the mind as a “black box”

-

Influenced by Ivan Pavlov & Edward Thorndike, behaviorists sought the general laws of learning, which link environmental events (“stimuli”) to the organism’s behavioral responses

-

Tremendous practical application, still influential

Cognitivism (1950’s) -

Key Figures: Many, including George Miller & Ulric Neisser

-

Goal: understand the mental processes that allow people to make decisions, set goals, plan, and create

-

Method: lab-based experimentation, with Neisser stressing need for “ecological validity”

-

Deliberately sought to open the “black box” of the mind

-

Heavily influenced by computer science and the notion that behavior and mental events could be understood in terms of information-processing.

-

The mind actively engages with the environment to solve problems

-

George Miller’s key paper (1956): “The Magical Number Seven: Plus or Minus Two”

-

Neisser’s influential textbook (1967): Cognitive Psychology

What is the relationship between the brain and the mind? {brain as in physical matter and mind as in personality and self} What is personality? Can we measure it? If so, how? Is intelligence really measurable? Research Methods in Psychology The Scientific Method -

The scientific method is a systematic procedure for obtaining knowledge about the world.

-

A key goal of the method is to identify cause-and-effect relationships

Psychology as a Science -

Sciences require rigorous and systematic methods of study to ensure: -

Claims are firmly grounded in evidence

-

Revisions reflect improved understanding

-

Example: Astrology is not science. It makes predictions, but the theory & methods aren’t changed when the prediction is inaccurate or completely fails

Overview of the Method

Theories vs. Hypotheses -

What is a theory? -

Comprehensive explanation of observable events and conditions. A good theory ties data together.

-

A good theory is: -

-

Falsifiable -

Precise

-

Evidence can be used to confirm/contradict

Parsimonious -

-

Small number of underlying assumptions

Generative

-

Guides future research

Scientific Theories -

Example of a falsifiable and parsimonious theory: -

Gravity is a force that pulls objects in the universe towards each other.

-

This theory states that larger and more massive objects pull smaller objects towards them.

-

Example of a theory that is NOT falsifiable and parsimonious: -

The sun goes around the earth. Little gnomes push it around the sky every day.

-

We can’t see them because they are invisible to the human eye.

Scientific Hypotheses -

How do we support theories scientifically? -

We seek evidence that will support or disprove hypotheses that are consistent with the theory -

Hypothesis = testable prediction of what should occur under a precisely stated set of conditions.

-

Should be specific and falsifiable.

-

Includes an independent variable and a dependent variable, both of which should be well-defined and measurable.

-

An example: -

Theory = The onset of schizophrenia can be explained by a combination of genetic predisposition and exposure to stress -

Two basic hypotheses that come from this theory: -

Schizophrenia will be more common among people with an identical twin with schizophrenia than among people with an identical twin without schizophrenia (genetic factor).

-

There should be some pairs of identical twins in which one has schizophrenia and one does not (stress factor).

Pseudoscience -

-

A set of claims that seems scientific but isn’t. -

No scientific method

-

Lacks scientific safeguards

Warning signs: -

Ad hoc immunizing hypothesizing: Hypothesizing loopholes

-

Overreliance on anecdotes

-

Lack of self-correction

-

Psychobabble

Science vs. Pseudoscience

6 Classic Principles of Scientific Thinking -

Ruling out rival hypotheses -

-

Have important alternate explanations for the finding been considered?

Correlation is NOT causation -

Two things occur together

-

Can we be sure A causes B

-

The classic example: Ice-cream sales and violence -

Third variable problem

-

Falsifiability -

-

-

Replicability -

Can the results be reproduced?

-

Report results in sufficient detail

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence -

-

Can the claim be disproven?

Compare with existing evidence

Occam’s razor -

Does a simpler explanation fit the data just as well?

-

How many variables should be in our model?

A New Emphasis: Open Science -

Make materials (survey items, experimental manipulations) and data publicly available. This is the principle of transparency.

-

Make statistical code publicly available (for easier reproducibility)

-

Preregister studies: Make clear the theory, hypotheses, methods, and analysis plan before collecting data.

-

Scientists can use tools like the Open Science Framework (OSF), supported by the Center for Open Science, to do all of this. [www.osf.io]

Scientific Methods in Psychology So, a researcher has a theory in mind, or has observed a phenomenon that raises questions. The researcher then comes up with a specific, testable hypothesis. Now what?

General Guidelines & Procedures -

Define variables -

-

Select (or create) measures of the variables -

-

A research study requires an operational definition Use valid and reliable measures

Determine the population to which the hypothesis should generalize, and sample from that population -

-

Population vs. sample

Select an appropriate, and feasible, design -

Consider strengths and weaknesses of various designs

Operational Definition An operational definition is “an objective description of how a research variable is going to be observed and measured” (Santrock, 2003) -

Example: We are investigating the effect of watching violent TV on children’s aggressive behavior. -

Definition of “watching violent TV”? -

# of times in a 1-hour show that one person threatens or injures another person.

-

Definition of “children’s aggressive behavior”? -

# of threats and assaults by the child over a 24-hour period after watching a particular TV show.

-

What are other words these psychologists would need to operationally define? -

Clinical Psychologist -

-

School Psychologist -

-

Stress, Depression, Grief, Substance Abuse Achievement, Attention, Learning

Industrial/Organizational Psychology -

Teamwork, Cooperation, Job Performance

Measures: Validity and Reliability -

Validity: extent to which a measure assesses what is claims to measure

-

Reliability: consistency of measurement -

Test-retest reliability: do people score similarly on the same test over time?

-

Internal consistency: during a single administration of the measure, does the same individual tend to score similarly on items that purport to assess the same variable?

-

Self-report -

Example: “How many sexual partners have you had over the past year?” -

Sensitive to format/wording; participants may lie or respond in a socially desirable way; inaccurate recall or introspective access

-

Other-report -

-

“How well does [Student X] get along with his/her peers?”

Indirect Measures -

Make inferences based on, for instance, reaction time

-

Useful for topics where desirable response is unexpected (e.g., attitudes about race)

-

Behavioral Measures -

Less common than self-report

Populations vs. Samples -

A population is the entire set of individuals of interest to the researcher

-

It’s not practical to study everyone -

So, we use a small sample (a selected subset) of the population.

-

We generalize our findings from that small number of observations to the population

-

Types of samples and sampling procedures: -

Convenience sample -

-

Easy to get

Representative sample -

Characteristics of the sample approximately match those of the population

-

Random sample

-

Every individual in the sample has an equal chance of being selected

For Psychology, Sampling is a Serious Problem -

Psychological research often samples from people who are WEIRD. -

Western

-

Educated

-

Industrialized

-

Rich

-

Democratic

Study Designs -

Many different methods can be used to study psychological concepts and phenomena.

-

2 general categories -

-

Non-experimental -

Naturalistic observation

-

Case history

-

Survey

-

Correlational

Experimental

Correlation Coefficient

-

Value ranges from -1.00 to +1.00

-

Size (and direction) matters!

-

Value ranges from -1.00 to +1.00

-

Size (and direction) matters!

-

Value ranges from -1.00 to +1.00
...


Similar Free PDFs