MO & SD - Grade: 100 A PDF

Preview

Summary

Chart with differences and how they are alike. Shows detailed examples...

Description

Motivating Operations and Discriminative Stimuli

How are they alike? Both are antecedents

How they differ? Discriminative stimuli are related to differential availability of currently effective

Motivation is required

reinforcement form for a certain behavior. Motivating operations related to differential reinforcing the effectiveness of environmental

state that both have evocative effect which

event type. Motivating operations will transformation the

can induce or subside responses

belongings of a stimulus through making it

Comprehension of the objective behavior is

positive or negative. Discriminative stimuli will regulate behavior

required and vital for both

through telling which behavior will be

occur before the behavior of interest

punished or reinforced. Attempt to expand Discriminative stimuli’s concept to account for Motivating operation effects.

Introduction Motivation is a critical variable to consider while assessing the capacity of behavior. As teachers, understanding what inspires youngsters to take part in specific behaviors (or not),

enables us to better mastermind instructive situations and chances to energize the advancement of new abilities. Motivating Operations is an important ABA concept that alludes to the interior procedures or wants of a person that change or enhance the estimation of a specific stimulus (Foxall, 2016). This alteration can enhance the adequacy or estimation of a specific reinforcer or Establishing Operations, or it can lessen or bring down the estimation of a specific reinforcer or Abolishing Operations. Discriminative stimulus is a term utilized as a part of classical conditioning as a piece of the procedure known as operant conditioning (Luque, Moris, & Rushby, 2015). A discriminative stimulus is a kind of stimulus that is utilized reliably to pick up a reaction and that expands the likelihood that the coveted reaction will happen. This paper will show you the likenesses and contrasts amongst motivating operations and discriminative stimulus. It will also provide three examples to them. Example One Establishing Operation (EO): Allen enjoys eating Oreo cookies. It is one of his desired snacks. His teacher learned this through observing which snacks he takes most of the time. She motivates him by allowing him to have an Oreo cookie after following a direction. He has an IEP meeting at the end of the day in which she needs for him to sit down for and she plans to reward him with two Oreos if he does. To increase the effectiveness, she is not giving him Oreos all day leading up to the IEP meeting (deprivation state). As a result, Allen is more likely to sit during the IEP meeting to receive the two Oreo cookies because he has not had any all day, thus increasing the effectiveness. Abolishing Operation (AO): Let us say that Allen’s teacher rewarded him with Oreo’s throughout the day they may lose their affect as a reinforcer (satiation state). Thus, meaning he is full and cannot eat another cookie. Therefore, during the IEP meeting Allen is not as likely to sit

the entire meeting to receive the cookie because he was given them all day. Thus, decreasing the effectiveness. Example Two My behavior of stepping on the brake pedal in my Ford Escape is under the stimulus control of a stop sign, red light or when the car in front of me puts on their break lights. All of these will cause the behavior of me stopping my car making them the discriminative stimulus (SD). Me seeing a green light or a merge ahead sign will not trigger the behavior of me steeping on the break pedal. The merge sign and green light are stimuli’s in the environment that do not have control over my behavior and they are referred to as S-deltas. Example Three A equals me needing a new car. B equals me having to save money to buy the new car. C equals me getting the new car. I work longer hours and take on extra shifts so that I can save money. I continually see ads for a new car as well as commercials. The ads and commercials make the desire for the new car even greater. The target behavior is saving money to buy a new car, the ads and commercials make me want one even more, therefore I am more likely to save all my money to buy a new car. The ads and commercials are establishing operations as it makes me want the new car more than I thought. It makes the care more desirable and more reinforcing to save money.

Conclusion In conclusion, motivating operations and discriminative stimulus both are antecedent variables, furthermore, they are both operant factors as opposed to control reaction recurrence in

light of their connection to fortifying or rebuffing results instead of to a respondent unconditioned stimulus (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007 pg. 377). The contrast of the two is that motivating operation modifies the reinforcer or rebuffs the viability of some stimulus, protest, or occasion; and adjusts the present recurrence of all conduct that has been strengthened or rebuffed by that stimulus, question, or occasion (pg. 699). Discriminative Stimulus is the nearness of which reactions of some kind have been strengthened and without which a similar sort of reactions has happened and not been fortified (pg. 694). A discriminative stimulus differs from a motivating operation because a discriminative stimulus triggers the accessibility of reinforcement, while a motivating operation changes the efficiency of a reinforcer (Cooper et al., 2007)....