Rehabilitation - Annelie harvey PDF

Title Rehabilitation - Annelie harvey
Course Forensic Psychology
Institution Anglia Ruskin University
Pages 4
File Size 83.6 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 42
Total Views 148

Summary

Annelie harvey...


Description

Rehabilitation •

Varying definitions



The reduction of criminal recidivism among adjudicated offenders (those convicted by the courts) McGuire (2010)



Strong focus within the Criminal Justice System

Why isn’t punishment enough? •

Behaviour change is more effectively brought about by positive reinforcement (Bandura, 1977)



For punishment to be most effective … ▫

Inevitability: offending behaviour must always be followed by punishment



Immediacy: punishment should occur more or less instantaneously



Severity: the most effective punishments occur at the maximum possible intensity



Availability of alternative behaviour: punishment works best when other options are available



Comprehensibility: Punishment should be understood in relation to the behaviour that has brought it about



None of these conditions are adequately met in the Criminal Justice System.



Speeding in your car on a motorway or other road?



Smoking or drinking under-age?



Using illegal substances?



Hit / kick / punch / push / threaten someone?

They can all be crimes. Look to why a person commits a crime, and then seek to change it. Criminogenic vs. Clinical needs Criminogenic needs •

Factors that have been theoretically and empirically considered to contribute to criminal behaviour and apply in the individual’s case



Successful intervention in these areas is likely to result in reduction in offending through rehabilitation

Clinical needs •

Factors that are related to the individual’s personal functioning



Targeting these needs may lead to an improved life for the offender

Andrews & Bonta (1998) Good Lives Model (Ward, 2002) •

All human beings are ‘goal directed’ – we want a good life!



Key things we all seek are called ”primary goods” – things that we want for their own sake.



Ways to achieve these are called “secondary goods” (e.g. money)



Offending is simply one way of achieving “goods”



May choose offending instead of non-offending because of inadequate scope, inappropriate means or inadequate resources.



Offending stops when we can achieve our goods without resorting to crime



1.life (including healthy living and functioning)



2.knowledge (how well informed one feels about things that are important to them)



3.excellence in play (hobbies and recreational pursuits)



4.excellence in work (including mastery experiences)



5.excellence in agency (autonomy, power and self-directedness)



6.inner peace (freedom from emotional turmoil and stress)



7.relatedness (including intimate, romantic, and familial relationships)



8.community (connection to wider social groups)



9.spirituality (in the broad sense of finding meaning and purpose in life)



10.pleasure (feeling good in the here and now)



11.creativity (expressing oneself through alternative forms).

Biopsychosocial Model (Engel, 1977)

This model examines: •

Biological



Psychological



Social

}

The human being is complex and must be understood as a whole There is a relationship between the body, mind and environment Social Exclusion Unit Report (2002) •

Accommodation

factors affecting an individual



Education, Training and Employment



Children and Families



Finance, Benefit and Debt



Attitudes, Thinking and Behaviour



Drugs and Alcohol

Mental and Physical Health History of Rehabilitation •

Nothing works’ (Martinson, 1974)



There was a shift from rehabilitation to punitive measures



Poor methodology of study



Other studies showed more positive results (Andrews et al., 1990)



‘What Works’ literature



Risk classification



Criminogenic needs



Responsivity



Community base



Treatment modality



Programme integrity



Evidence based interventions offered within the CJS



Designed to target specific criminogenic needs



Delivered to groups of offenders shown to have the specific needs the programme addresses



Clinical input provided by Forensic Psychologists to maintain integrity



Accreditation process

In Prison Service OBPs are the most frequently used method – 1)

Developed based on theory and research

2)

Abide by What Works principles

3)

Can be monitored for programme integrity

These are more cost-effective than 1:1 interventions, allows for large scale evaluation Offender Characteristics Intervention work should be focused on the specific needs of the individual (Howells, 2011)



Motivation & readiness: Completion rates of offending behaviour programmes positively correlated with offender motivation (Harper & Chitty, 2004)



Engagement: shown to be a key determinant of outcome (Drieschner & Verschuur, 2010)



Intellectual Ability



Literacy skills



Personality traits

Mental & physical health Facilitator Characteristics •

Therapeutic Alliance; A meta-analysis including twenty-one studies found the therapeutic alliance to have a positive impact on reducing recidivism (Taxman & Ainsworth, 2009).



Pro-Social Modelling (Tallant, Sambrook & Green, 2008)



Motivational Interviewing (Tallant, Sambrook & Green, 2008)



Effective Leadership (Feasey, 2008)



Working collaboratively (Marshall & Burton, 2010)

The Good Lives Model (Ward, 2002) ▫

We are predisposed to seek ‘Primary goods’



An individual commits crime because they lack the capabilities to achieve valued outcomes in personally

fulfilling and socially acceptable ways ▫

Considering an offender’s goals and obtaining a good life is playing a greater role in rehabilitation

Approaches to rehabilitation focused on the individual: •

Therapeutic community



Psychologically Informed Planned Environment (PIPE)



Personality Disorder Unit (formerly DSPD)



Personality Disorder Therapeutic Community



Adapted Therapeutic Community



Restorative Justice



Multi Systemic Therapy (MST)...


Similar Free PDFs