Title | Research paradigms - Lecture notes midterm |
---|---|
Author | Alexandra Belanger |
Course | Nursing Research |
Institution | Laurentian University |
Pages | 3 |
File Size | 164.9 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 70 |
Total Views | 161 |
Research ParadigmsAssumptions Paradigm: shared belief systemPositivist Paradigm Naturalist/ Constructivist/ Interpratism ParadigmOntology (Beliefs about reality) (Philosophy related to existence)Realism One “truth” /reality exists Objective Static Context-free (does not matter) Truth can be found an...
Research Paradigms Positivist Paradigm
Assumptions Paradigm: shared belief system Ontology (Beliefs about reality) (Philosophy related to existence)
Epistemology (Approaches to knowing) (The relationship between the researcher and the researched) (How knowledge is acquired)
Methodology How one goes about finding out information. Methods Concept Analysis Approach
– – – – – – –
Realism One “truth” /reality exists Objective Static Context-free (does not matter) Truth can be found and measured Underpins positivism Deductive logic Measured by scientific or natural laws Objective (Etic) Outsider’s approach
The researchers are on the outside from those being researched.
Quantitative
Naturalist/ Constructivist/ Interpratism Paradigm
– – – – – – – –
Relativism Multiple “truths” Subjective Realityynamic (changing) Contextual (influences reality) Meaning can be explored in depth Underpins constructivism Inductive logic Goal : understanding Explore meaning in depth Subjective (Emic) Insider’s approach
The researcher interacts with those being researched, and findings are the creation of that interaction. Subjective knowledge acquisition Qualitative
Surveys
Interviews
Walker and Avant
Rogers
Qualitative or Quantitative Case Study -simple or complex -in-depth analysis of an individual, group, institution, or other social unit Participatory Action Research Collaboration between researcher and the participants to define and solve the problem
Experimental Design Randomized controlled trials (RCTs): “gold standard” Ca u s ea nde ffe c ta mon gv a r i a b l e s 1) random sample 2) control group for comparison 3) intervention
Design: Phenomenology Aim: understanding the “lived experiences” -Seeking meaning -Small sample size -In-depth conversations -Essays or book (long format)
* if any of the 3 elements are missing it’s not a RCT = Quasi-experimental
Design: Ethnography Aim: Understanding the participants “culture” -Conducted in natural setting Data collection: observations, documents, interviews, diary
Descriptive Non-Experimental Design -Survey -descriptive, exploratory, comparative -Correlational Describes relationships between factors/ variables (Correlation does not = causation) -Case Control -Association through retrospection -Cohort Study Compares 2 or more groups over time to compare outcome
Qualitative Research Uses smaller sample sizes Subjective Interpretative Inductive: works from specific to broad generalizations Thematic analysis Quantitative Research Uses larger sample sizes Objective Deductive: works from the more general to the more specific Statistical analysis
Design: Grounded theory Aim: Develop a theory to explain social process *incongruent Data collection: Constant comparison of old and new data to develop a theory
Evidence Based Practice
Naturalistic inquiry: fancy word for qualitative research...