Title | Tensile Test Lab Report |
---|---|
Author | Mina Kerlos |
Course | Strength Of Materials |
Institution | Essex County College |
Pages | 17 |
File Size | 653.2 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 12 |
Total Views | 153 |
EXPLANATION OF STEPS OF LAB WHAT WE BENEFIT FROM THIS LAB IN OUR LIFE...
Essex County College Division of Engineering Technologies & Computer Sciences ENR 221-001 Strength ofMateria1s Professor Acquaye, Theophilus A. Lab Report: # 1 MINA IBRAHIM
Tension Test
(above: Terco MT3017 Tensile/Brinell Testing Machine) :トみ、ツも江
〔0 ア・・1
をー
を吐い、
Remarks: c ん{トら
oル
O'.æRAU- LENGTH
-REDUCED- SECTION
Procedure the Tensile Test following the below steps:
Terco MT 3017 Tensile/BrineIl Testing Machine Setup:
1. Wind the pressure cylinder back to zero by turning anticlockwise 2. Insert and fix Test piece by screwing into lower and upper jaws 3. Turn the Dial Gage on 4. Raise the column to push on Dial Gage plunger until a deformation of about 10mm is indicated 5. Set the red pointer (which reads the maximum force) of the pressure gauge to zero 6. Set the dial gauge to zero MT3047 Data Acquisition Setup:
1. Turn on the computer and every component of the data acquisition system 2. Double click on the MT 3047 Tensile/BrineIl Testing Software 3. Then select the meter icon:
Following graphic will appear:
Tension Test: Obiectives:
O The objective of this experiment is to observe the stress-strain relationship for several standard materials such as aluminum, steel, brass by performing a tensile test.
Equipment:
• Terco MT 3017 Tensile / Brinnell Machine. • Data acquisition system Computer generated software, dial gage, strain gage). • Specimen of steel, brass and aluminum. Procedure: This lab's procedure was as follows: First we prepared the Terco Mt3017 testing machine and that is by initializing all gauges to zero values. Second we had to turn the lever counter clock wise in order to lower the pressure. Third inserting the test piece (Aluminum, Brass or Steel) and screwing it in both lower and upper clamps. Fourth, we turn the digital Dial Gage on and pushing the plunger in till we reach a maximum deformation of about 1 Omm as the professor indicated making sure that our value is positive. Fifth step, we set the red pointer of the pressure gage to zero and initializing the values of the dial gage to zero as well. Sixth step, we turned on our computer generated software and followed instruction until it was ready to record data. Seventh step, we gave the specimen a little pressure in order to avoid all the zeros in our data table than we had to rest the Dial gage to zero again. Eight step, this step required two group members, one had to click on the record button while the other starts cranking the machine clockwise exerting pressure on the specimen until failure. Ninth step, we collected the data from the software along with the Force vs. Deformation graph for each specimen, and shared the information along other fellow students.
Results: Standard Specimens:
O Stress-Strain Diagram expresses a relationship between a load applied to a material and the deformation ofthe material, caused by the load. Stress-Strain Diagram is determined by tensile test.. In these specimens we used Lo = 5 * diameter. The specimen deformation (strain) is t e ratio of the increase of the specimen gauge length to its original gauge length:
Tensile stress is the ratio of the tensile load F applied to the specimen to its original cross-sectional area So:
o=F/So
% Error: Aluminum Strain: 0.0496
Stress: :387.084 (10% N/mA2)
tensile stress = 387.084 / 0.064 = 64 Mpa (founded) , tcnsilc strain
Actual value of E: 70 Mpa Percent error = (estimate - actual) / actual * 100 IAbsolute valuel = (64 - 70) / 70 = 0.0857 * 100 = 8.5 % Error.
Brass Same procedure was used to obtain a percent error of: 7.6%
Steel Same procedure was used to obtain a percent error of: 8.2 %
Conclusion: Following all the lab procedures, step by step avoiding any mistakes and human errors we were able to obtain stress vs. strain charts. Our results were close to the actual values looking at the low percent errors we ended up with in this lab of tensile stress was a success. We were able to test three different specimens are illustrate the difference between their stresses and strains
ALtn,flNUM Msr#
Force
Deformation (mm)
Average Normal Strain (mm/mm)
Average Normal Stress
(NfPa)
8
0.0
0.02
0.001
o.ooo
9
0.0
0.03
0.001
o.ooo
10
0.0
0.05
0.002
o.ooo
11
1.8
0.07
0.003
210.855
12
2.1
0.09
14
2.8
0.14
15
3.4
0.17
16
3.9
0.21
0.004
245.997 13
2.4
0.11
0.004
281.140
0.006
327.996
0.007
398.281
0.008 456.852
17
4.5 0.24 O.OIO 527.137 18 4.9 0.26 19
5.70.31
20
6.2 6.3
0.34
22
6.8
0.36
23
7.40.43
24
7.40.52
25
7.4
26
7.60.62
27
7.6
0.012
667.707
0.014
726.277
0.014
737.991
0.014
796.562
0.017
866.847
0.021
866.847
0.022
866.847
0.025
890.275
0.030
890.275
0.034
901.989
0.039
901.989
0.043
901.989
0.045
901.989
0.047
913.704
0.052
925.418
0.056
925.418
0.059
925.418
0.56
0.74
28
7.7
0.85
29
7.7
0.97
30
7.7
1.07
31
7.7
1.13
32
7.8
1.18
33
7.91.31
34
7.9
35
7.9
36
7.91.59 1.68
573.993
0.34
21
37 7.9
0.010
1.41
0.064
40
8.0 1.93
41
7.9 2.04
42
8.0 2.11
43
8.0 2.20
44
7.9 2.28
45
7.8 2.38
925.418 38
0.074
8.0
1.77
0.071
937.132
0.067
925.418 39
8.0
1.85
937.132 0.077
937.132
0.082
925.418
0.084
937.132
0.088
937.132
0,091
925.418
46
0.095
913.704
0.099
890.275
7.6 2.48
STRESS vs STRAIN / Aluminum 1000.ooo 900.000 800.000 700.000 600.000 500.000 400.000 300.000 200.000 100.000 o.ooo o.ooo 0.040
0.020 0.060 0.080
0.100
0.120
Strain (mm/mm)
STEEL Isr#Force ( kN)Deformation (mm) Stress (MPa) 1 3
0.0
4
o.ooo 2 0.0
0.01 0,0004
0.0
Avg . Normal Strain (mm/mm) Avg. Normal 0.01 0.0004
0. 01
o.ooo
0,0004
0.0 0.01 0.0004 o.ooo 5 0.0 0.01 0.0004 o.ooo
0.01 0.0004
7
0. 0
8
1 . 5 0.03 0.0012
236.822
9
1 . 9 0. 04 0.0016
299.975
10
2 .3
0.07 0.0028
363.127
11
2. 6
0. 08 0.0032
410.491 12 3.2
0,000 o.ooo 6 0. 0
o.ooo
0. 02 0,0008
0.10 0.0040
505.220 13
3.8
0. 13 0,0052 15
599.949 14 4. 6 0. 16 0.0064
5. 0 0.17 0.0068
16
5 . 6
0.19
17
6.5
0.21
7 . 3
19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
0.25
726.254
789.407 0.0076
884.135
0,0084
1026,229
0,0100
1152.534
0.0108
1247.263
0.0116
1357.779
0,0128
1515.661
0,0140
1657.754
0.0152
1752.483
0.0168
1768.271
0.0196
1815.635
0.0228
1815.635
0.0256
1847.212
0.0300
1863,000
0.27
8 . 6 0.29 9. 6 10.5
11.1 11.2
11.5 11.5
0.32 0.35
0.38 0. 42
0.49 0.57
0. 64
11.8
0.75
37
29 30
11.8
0.84
0. 92
0.0336
31
11.9
0, 99 0.0368
32
12.0
1. 07
33
12 . 1
1.13 0.0428
1894.576
34
12. 1
1.21 0.0452
1910.364
35
12.2
1.30 0.0484
1910,364
36
12.2
1. 41 0.0520
1926.152 0.0564
1926.152
0.0596
1926.152
12.2
0.0396
1878.788
1.49 0.0616
1 . 64
0.0656
1.75
0.0700
12.4
1.79
0.0716
12.4
1.88
0.0752
12.4
1.99
0.0796
2.07
0.0828
2.13
0.0852
12.3
2.23
0.0892
1941 40
12.1
2.35
0.0940
12.0
2.46
0.0984
2.61
0.1044
1910 64 1894 76 1847 12
12.3
39 40
12.3 12.3
41 42
47
1878.788
1.54
38
45
1863.ooo
12.3 12.4
49
1941 40 1941 40 1941 40 1957. 9 1957. 9 1957. 29 1941. 40 1957 29
50
11.6
2.69
0.1076
1831 23
51
11.3
2.79
0.1116
1784 59
52
10.9
2. 94
0.1176
1720 07
53
10.5
3.09
0.1236
1657 54
54
10.0
3.23
0.1292
1578 13
55
9.3
3.36
0.1344
1468 96
OPPER
fsr#Force ( kN) Deformation (mm) Avg. Normal Strain (mm/mm) Stress (MPa)o.ooo 0.01 0.0004
5
0.0 6
0.0 0.03
7
Avg . Normal
0.06
0.0024
0.0012 311.698 0.0032
8
2.3
0.08
9
2. 6
0.10 0.0040
10
3.4 0.14 0.0056
623.396
11
4.1 0.18 0.0072
751.743 12 5.1
0.0088
13
5.6
o.ooo 421.709
476.715
0.22
935.095
0.25 0.0100
1026.771
0.0120
14 15
6,8
0.30
7 . 1
0.35 0.0140
1301.799
16
7.4
0.39 0.0156
1356.804
17
7.3
0.56 0,0224
1338,469
18
7.3
0. 66 0.0264
1338.469
19
7.3
0.80 0.0320
1338.469
20
7.3
0.97 0.0388
1338,469
21
7 .3
1.12 0.0448
1338.469
22
7.3
1.25 0.0500
1338.469
23
7.2
1.41 0.0564
1320,134
1246.793
24 25
7.1
1.56 0.0624
1301.799
7.0
1.71 0.0684
1283.463
26
6.9
1.88 0.0752
1265.128
27
6.8
1.97 0.0788
1246.793
28
6.6
'2.15
0.0860
1210.123
29
6.3
2.33
0.0932
1155.117
30 31
6.0
2.52 0.1008
2. 64
0.1056
32 33
5.2
2.87 0,1148
3.05
0.1220
1100.111
1045.106 953.430
861.754
BRASS Msr#
Force
Defonnation (mm) 17
0.0 0.02
0.01
Average Normal Strain (mm/mm) 0.0004 o.ooo 18 0.0
0.01
Average Normal Stress (MPa) 0.0004 o.ooo
19
0.0
0.0008 o.ooo
20
0.0 0.03 0.0012 o.ooo 21 0.0 0.04 0,0016 o.ooo 22 1.7 0.06 0.0024 259.749
23
1.7
0.06
0.0024 259.749
24
2.0
0.07
0.0028 305.587
25
220.08
0.0032 336.145
26
2.5
0.10
0.0040 381.983
27
2.8
0.12
0.0048 427.821
28
3.1
0.14
0.0056 473.659
29
3.5
0.16
0.0064 534.776
30
4.0
0.19
31
0.0076 611.173
4.3
021
0.0084 657.011 32
33
5.0 0.25
0.0100 763.966
34
5.6 0.28
0.0112 855.642
35
6.1 0.31
0.0124 932.039
36
6.7
0.36
0.0144 1023.715 37
6.9
0.0196 1100.111 39
40
7.6 0.72
7.5
4.5
0.22
0.41
0.0088 687.570
0.0164 1054.273 38
0.60
7.2
0.49
0.0240 1145.949
0.0288
1161229 41
7.6 0.80
0.0320
1161229 42
7.7
44
7.9 120
0.0480
45
8.0 1.33
0.0532
0.93
0.0372 1176.508 43
7.8
1.05
0.0420 1191.787
1207.067 1222.346
46
8.0 1.43
0.0572
47
8.1 1.56
0.0624
48
8.2 1.69
0.0676
49
8.2 1.78
0.0712 1252.905
50
8.3 1.90
0.0760
1222,346 1237.625
1252.905 1268.184
51
8.3 2.05
0.0820 1268.184
52
8.4 2.19
0.0876
53
8.4 2.33
0.0932
1283.463
54
8.4 2.41 1283,463 Msr# Force
0.0964 1283.463 Deformation (mm)
Average Normal Strain (mm/mm) Average Normal Stress (NfPa)
55
8.52.55
70
8.64.43
56
8.52.71
71
8.4 4.58
57
8.5 2.84
72
8.34.66
58
8.6 2.95
59
8.63.10 60 8.6
325
3.38 62 8.7
3.49
61
8.6
63
8.73.58
64
8.7 3.70
65
8.73.83 66 8.7
67
8.74.07
68
8.7 4.17
69
8.6 4.30
3.95
STRESS vs STRAIN
1400.000
1314.022
0.1300
1200.000 1000.000 800.000 600.000 400.000 200.000 o.ooo o.oooo
o. 1020
0.0200
0.0400
0.0600
1298.743 0.1084 1298.743
0.1136
1298.743
0.1180
1314.022
Strain (mm/mm)
Calculations: Specimen gage length = 25mm
Specimen diameter = 5mm
Stress =
0.1240
force (N) original specimen cross—sectional area (m)
elongation (mm) Strain = original speciman gage length (mm)
0.0800
1314.022
0.1352
1314.022
0.1396
1329.301
0.1432
1329.301
0.1480
1329.301
0.1532
1329.301
0.1580
1329.301 0.1628 1329.301
o. 1668
1329,301 0.1720 1314.022
0.1772
1314.022
0.1832
1283.463
0.1864
1268,184
0.1000
Brass 0.1200
0.1400
0.1600
0.1800
0.2000
Stress Modulus of Elasticity (E) =
Percentage Error =
A Strain
I Experimental E — Theoretical E I Theoretical E x 100
Theoretical E values (GPa):
Steel:
207
Copper: 125 Aluminum: 72
Brass:
97
236.822
/ .0012 = 197.351
311.698
/ .0024 = 129.874
210.855
/ .0030
70.285
108.229
/ .0024 = 108.228
197.351 / 207) * -207 / 125 129.874125 / 72) 70.28572 (1 108.228- 97 / 97 * 100 = 11.58
4.66 3.90
2.38
Experimental E values (GPa)Percentage Error (%)
Steel Copper Aluminum
Brass
Conclusion: Graph Analysis:
•
The test showed that the initial portion of each Stress Strain diagam for each of the four test specimens display a linearity: an increase in average normal stress is accompanied by a proportional increase in average normal strain. Thus, these four engineering materials follow Hooke's Law through their Proportional Limit and are linear elastic.
•
A direct result of each of these materials being linear elastic is that the mechanical property, Modulus of Elasti...