91703 Marking Rubric for Video Presentation-1 PDF

Preview

Summary

Practice Material for Physiological Systems. 2020...

Description

Marking Rubric for 91703 Physiological Systems Collaborative Video Presentation (30% of final mark) Create a five-minute video based on a published journal article. Use the individual essays to create a presentation about the journal article of your choice. 5 points

Professional, ethical, and social responsibility (GA 3) Journal article chosen is relevant either to your future field of practice, or a publication on medical issues/discoveries 0

2.5

3.5

4

5

Fail

Pass

Credit

Distinction

High Distinction

Article chosen is not relevant to field of practice or current medical issues

Article chosen is relevant to field of practice or current medical issues

Article chosen is relevant to field of practice or current medical issues

Article chosen is relevant to field of practice or current medical issues

Article chosen is relevant to field of practice or current medical issues

Justification and explanation of choice presented clearly detailed in the Introduction

Justification and explanation of choice presented clearly and concisely in the Introduction

Justification and explanation of choice is absent from the Introduction or poorly written

Justification and explanation of choice is limited in the Introduction of the essay

Justification and explanation of choice presented in the Introduction

No introduction in the essay Disciplinary knowledge (GA 1)

5 marks

Demonstrated understanding of and ability to explain the Physiological Systems concepts addressed in the article 0 Fail Poor or absent explanation of the article key points and findings; no evidence of relating the article to physiological concepts Main area or topic of physiology covered in the article is not explained or poorly explained

2.5 Pass

A limited explanation of the main question or aim, method (if applicable), results or findings, and conclusion; an attempt is made to explain these in the context of physiological concepts Main area or topic of physiology covered in the article is explained briefly

3.5 Credit

Detailed explanation and discussion permits reader to understand the main question or aim, method (if applicable), results or findings, and conclusion in the context of physiological concepts Main area or topic of physiology covered in the article is explained

4

5

Distinction

High Distinction

Clear and detailed explanation permits reader to understand the main question or aim, method (if applicable), results or findings, and conclusion in the context of physiological concepts

Clear and comprehensive explanation permits reader to understand the main question or aim, method (if applicable), results or findings, and conclusion in the context of physiological concepts

Main area or topic of physiology covered in the article is explained in detail

Main area or topic of physiology covered in the article is explained clearly and in detail

Research, Inquiry, and Critical Thinking

5 marks

Use references to support your discussion. 0

2.5

3.5

4

5

Fail

Pass

Credit

Distinction

High Distinction

Essay contains no evidence of literature or subject resources directly relating to the publication. No references and no in-text citation

Essay has satisfactory evidence of literature and subject resources but is incomplete, lacking in connections to important ideas, concepts of the publication.

Essay has links between literature and subject resources and mentions their connections to the publication.

There is evidence of literature and subject resources that are directly linked /integrated into ideas, concepts of the publication.

There is excellent evidence of literature and subject resources being linked directly to ideas and concepts of the publication.

Most references are correctly styled using APA 7th referencing, 2 -5 errors

Most references are correctly styled using APA 7 th referencing, less than 2 errors

Complete list of references and in-text citations using APA 7 th referencing, without errors

Some (> 5) errors in referencing and in-text citations. With reference list but without in-text citations

Communication and Professional Skills

5 marks

Organisation and flow of the presentation; Ability to translate information into broader context that can be easily understood 2.4

2.5

3.5

4

5

Fail

Pass

Credit

Distinction

High Distinction

Frequently incoherent and fails to communicate effectively to the audience

Presentation has some coherence and communicates main ideas to the audience, but not always effectively

Generally coherent presentation; communicates effectively to the audience

Coherent presentation; communicates effectively to the target audience

Exemplary presentation; communicates effectively to the target audience (other science students)

Structure of presentation does not develop or demonstrate a logical progression of thoughts and ideas.

Structured but overall may be inconsistent, thoughts and ideas sometimes clearly presented.

Some parts (3.5 out of 5 minutes) are well-structured and generally demonstrate a logical progression of thoughts and ideas.

The entire video is well-structured to clearly Most parts (4 out of 5 minutes) are welldevelop and demonstrate a logical progression of structured to develop and demonstrate a thoughts and ideas throughout the presentation logical progression of thoughts and ideas....