BUS1101 unit 4 written assignment template 12 PDF

Title BUS1101 unit 4 written assignment template 12
Author najm sadiq
Course Business Communications
Institution University of the People
Pages 2
File Size 53.7 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 39
Total Views 162

Summary

Discussion Forum Unit 5Discussion Forum Unit 5
Unit 5 DiscussionDiscussion Forum Unit 5
Unit 5 DiscussionDiscussion Forum Unit 5
Unit 5 DiscussionDiscussion Forum Unit 5
Unit 5 DiscussionDiscussion Forum Unit 5
Unit 5 DiscussionDiscussion Forum Unit 5
Unit 5 Discu...


Description

1 Critical thinking and peer evaluation are linked in a few ways. When peer assessing another colleague's work, you should think critically since your judgment will be more objective if you apply critical thinking. Your teacher will provide you with an outline, but it will be up to you to critically examine the answers and determine whether they will answer the question. You can't just enroll and study because you're a student. In general, one method I may evaluate this week's written assignment is to satisfy the required standards. This is the first thing to keep an eye out for. If these requirements are satisfied, you will be able to determine whether or not the individual is trustworthy. has clarified his response or made up facts irrelevant to the question Critical thinking is one of the talents tested during peer evaluation. If you don't apply critical thinking, you won't be able to assess your classmates' replies with their best interests in mind. Constructive criticism is a byproduct of critical thinking, and it might assist your colleague grasp what they're talking about if they haven't before. 2 - I'm not really sure how the assessment process works. Perhaps there aren't any surprises in store for me, despite the fact that I had prior peer evaluation experience from college. However, I am concerned about the ratings. My major concern will be for the evaluation I receive to be honest and trustworthy. Another difficulty I have is keeping an excessive amount of neutrality when conducting peer reviews. I don't want my peers' evaluation to be misinterpreted in any manner that they don't like. Last but not least, I'm worried that I'm reading too much into the criticism I've gotten and assuming that I've gotten negative or insufficient input to assist me develop critical thinking.

APA 1-5 tips to improve your critical thinking - Samantha Agoo 2-TED-ed 3-2016 4- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dItUGF8GdTw 5- TED-ed (2018) 5 tips to improve your critical thinking - Samantha Agoo [video file]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dItUGF8GdTw

6- in-text(TED-ed,2016)...


Similar Free PDFs