HIS 200 7-2 Module Seven Short Responses PDF

Preview

Summary

Download HIS 200 7-2 Module Seven Short Responses PDF

Description

Module 7 Short Responses – Question 1 Name three historical lenses that you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Be sure to respond to this question in two to three sentences, using proper grammar.

Your response I would use social, economic, and political to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. The political lens will focus on laws during that time period. The social lens will focus on the different groups of people. The economic lens will focus on the relationships between capital and labor.

Module 7 Short Responses – Question 2 Revise the thesis statement at the top of this page to reflect a more complex view of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Your revised thesis statement should be longer than one sentence.

Your response In the early 19th century disputes between Native American and white settlers over land. The white settlers tried different tactics against the Native American. Government officials got involved which helped white settlers gain what they desired.

Module 7 Short Responses – Question 3 Name three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video you just saw. Your response I would use the social, economic. and culture lens.

Module 7 Short Responses – Question 4 Massasoit's decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on what previous event or events? (Name one or two.)

Your response

Massasoit's decision came from the suffering from the plague. Which was deadly diseases that the Europeans brought to their homeland.

Module 7 Short Responses – Question 5 Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims.

Your response A long-term consequence was the ongoing war in the 1630's between the Wampanoag and Pilgrims. A short-term consequence would be the mutual defense alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims.

Module 7 Short Responses – Question 6 How has your understanding of the historical event in your essay changed as a result of your research? Describe one instance of a misconception or a wrong idea you had about your topic that has been corrected after researching and writing about it.

Your response I feel understanding the different historical events has changed a lot. I have a better understanding of the different lens to analyze the events.

Module 7 Short Responses – Question 7 Name four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee Removal. Specify one aspect of this event for each lens that you cite.

Your response The four lens I would use are military, political, economic, and social. Social lens is for the communication among themselves and others. Military lens is for the troops involved in the removal. Political lens is for the Treaty.

Economical lens the Native Americans lived on rich lands filled with natural sources.

Module 7 Short Responses – Question 8 Agree or disagree with the following thesis statement: "The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it." Cite at least three historical facts that support your position.

Your response I agree with the statement. The Cherokee National Council threatened to impeach John Ridge. John Ross denounced the treaty. In 1838 Martin Van Buren ordered General Winfield Scott to begin removing the Native Americans....