Hw 4- - null idk I jut want assec to it but please PDF

Preview

Summary

null idk I jut want assec to it but please...

Description

2. Premise 1: H=humans and C= chimpanzees, they have these stuff in common, A, are certainly capable of feeling pain. B, they will avoid negative feedback (electrical shocks) in a laboratory setting when given the opportunity to do so. D, when one is injured others will recognize the pain behavior and try to comfort and help the injured member of the group. E, when given pain-relief medicine soon after an injury, they connect the medicine to the relief from pain, because when injured again they will give the sign for the medicine. Premise 2: H has F, “there are legal and ethical constraints that protect humans from experimentation without their consent”. Conclusion: Therefore C probably should have F The arguments tructure: H and C have a, b, d, e, in common. H has F. Therefore, probably C has F.

3. Premises 1: X= humans and Y= dogs. They have the following in common: A=they have both killed for no apparent reason or severely injured someone. Premises 2: Y has B= when a dog has killed or severely injured a human for no apparent reason we feel justified in killing the dog in order to stop it from doing more damage. Conclusion: Therefore probably x has b= we should feel justified in killing them in order to stop more damage. The argument structure: X and Y have a in common Y has B Therefore probably X has B

4.

Premises 1: X= england, Y= japan, and Z= United states, have the following in common. A= have large populations, b=are in the top 5 in terms of economic strength among the world's countries, c= are democracies, d= large prison systems. Premises 2: X and Y have E= strict gun control legislation Conclusion: Therefore, probably z should have e if the US wants to lower its homicide rate it has to pass strict gun control legislation The argument structure: X, Y, and Z have a, b, c, d, in common. X and Y have g. Therefore, probably Z should have g.

5. Premise 1: X, the junior, and Y, the fifth grader, have the following attributes in common: a, eat the same food; b, have their own bedrooms; c, get the same amount of allowance. Premise 2: X has d: has to do housework. Conclusion: Therefore, probably Y should have d: has to do housework. The argument structure: X and Y have a, b, c, in common. X has d. Therefore, probably Y should have d....