Pluto argumentative essay - anahy dominguez PDF

Preview

Summary

paper on pluto...

Description

Argumentative Essay Should Pluto be a planet? Intro Paragraph Hook (pick 1) ✓shocking fact ✓scenario ✓rhetorical question

Context ✓what is the issue ✓why is it important ✓Use relevant schema

Thesis

When it comes to the universe, we usually don’t define things based on their location, but that’s just what’s happening to poor pluto. There’s a disagreement among scientist whether pluto should or should not be a planet. Pluto should be a planet because the arguments made against pluto are weak because they lack clarity and, other planets in pluto’s position would not clear the orbital path.

✓1 sentence with two unique reasons

Body Paragraph 1 A- Answer ✓focus on reason 1

C- cite evidence ✓relevant quote for reason 1 ✓Cite title and author

E- explain Mean ✓paraphrase the quote

Matter ✓Explain HOW the evidence connect to thesis. ✓Use schema

Body Paragraph 2

A Reason why pluto should be a planet is because the arguments made against pluto are weak because they lack clarity. To better understand the situation according to “Why  Pluto Should Be A Planet” by Document3 “Something  that small just shouldn’t be a planet.Of course , they couldn't just come out and say that, so they came up with this idea about clearing the neighborhood a nice , vague, easily debatable term.)”This quote reveals that the reasons for pluto not being a planet is very weak and that the opposing side really doesn’t have a very good reason to go against that pluto should not be a planet.Therefore the analysis of this evidence reveals that pluto should be considered a planet and that the reasons for pluto should not be a planet are extremely very weak only against of that specific reason.  Another reason why pluto should be a planet is that

A- Answer ✓focus on reason 2

C- cite evidence ✓relevant quote for reason 2 ✓Cite title and author

E- explain Mean ✓paraphrase the quote

Matter ✓Explain HOW the evidence connect to thesis. ✓Use schema

Counter argument Opposing sides position ✓focus on reason 1

strengths ✓reasons supporting their argument

Rebuttal ✓why their argument is weak

Conclusion Restate the thesis ✓do not repeat

other planet’s position would not clear the orbital path.To better understand the situation according to “ Why pluto should be a planet” by document 3 “Obviously if little continues to intersect the orbit of p neptune , every few hundred years neptune hasn’t done enough to clear the neighborhood “(document3). This quote reveals that if neptune is within the orbital path of pluto and neptune shouldn’t be considered a planet as well. Therefore, the analysis of this evidence reveals that people should now realize that pluto should be considered a planet. This now meant that pluto should be a planet because its orbital path is being intersected by other planets.  

Some may say that pluto should not be a planet because there are many other objects similar to pluto in the solar system. This could be because if pluto was included in the solar system and was considered a planet then all other objects in the kuiper belt should also be included as planets.However, this is incorrect because imagine that you have to study a solar system quiz and you sit there .And wonder if your teacher is trying to torture you because there are so many planets in the solar system who should you blame your teacher or the people who said that pluto shouldn’t be a planet.If you said the people who agreed that pluto should not be a planet then I would agree with you because that’s a lot of planets to study. And if you didn't add those you would have much easier studying.Also this means that when having to study you would just have to study 9 planets and prove that pluto should be considered a planet.  It is clear that pluto should be a planet. While the other side feels that pluto should not be a planet because it doesn’t have a clear orbital path, this is weak and not true because all planets don’t have a clear orbital path.

Revisit the argument ✓readdress the opposition and it’s weakness

Leave the reader thinking...