AA Peer Review-2 Katherine PDF

Preview

Summary

First peer review for audience memoramdum...

Description

Date: 11/7/2021 Assessment Completed by: Nicole Harper Quinn Peer Review of: Destiny Robinson

Instructions 1. Open the audience analysis assignment to be familiar with the assignment and criteria while responding to these questions. 2. On another tab, have the "peer review sample.docx" (available via Unit 1 Peer Review and Final Draft Submission Folder) document open to help guide your responses. 3. Select a draft to review that has not already been reviewed or only has one review. 4. Enter your feedback in the "Audience Analysis Peer Review Form" and return the "Audience Analysis Peer Review Form" to your peer.

Your narrative responses must be in complete sentences and must use language found in "peer review sample"

1. The analysis addresses all questions for analysis. If not, then list all of the missing responses to questions for your peer. 2. The analysis is well organized. It has a clear structure with an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. If there is not a clear structure, provide a comment about how to make the structure clearer. 3. The memo includes a clear analysis of the two web sites, including comparison and contrast of the sites themselves and their target audiences. It does not just describe. If there is not a clear analysis of a technical and non-technical website, provide feedback to your peer on where the analysis needs to be in the document. Point out any areas where there is description. 4. The analysis is concrete in that it uses examples from the Websites to support major points. The use of examples is selective and to-the-point. The examples are included in order to illustrate the analysis point and not to fill the page with words. There are no long direct quotations (defined as more than 3 lines) from the analyzed Websites.

5. The student explains how the examples relate back to the analysis. If there are any deviations to these criteria, provide your peer with feedback using the peer review worksheet templates to guide your responses. 6. The memo is formatted correctly following the specified guidelines for memos from Chapter 11. APA citation style is used when needed. If there are errors, point those out to your peer. 7. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are correct. Minimum word requirement is met. If there are errors, point those out to your peer. 8. Rate how well the paper aligns with the assignment guidelines (minimal = does not meet assignment guidelines; medium = meets about 75% of the assignment guidelines; very high = meets 95% or above of the assignment guidelines) Minimal Low Medium High Very high 9. Suggestions for meeting the assignment guidelines: 10. Write a final comment to your peer about two of the overall strengths and one overall weakness of the first draft. 1.Hello Catherine! Your address every single question that we were given with this audience analysis memo excellent job! 2. Your paper was clear organized you had a great intro that flowed well into the body and conclusion. Just great! 3.Your audience analysis was spot on with the comparison and contrast and identifying the target audiences for each. 4.Do you have a great examples that supported the major points of your analysis from each website. 5.You did a wonderful job of circling back and reminding the reader of the analysis portion between the two websites 6.You formatted your memo correctly according to APA guidelines 7.You definitely met the word requirement and I found little to no errors 8.I write your paper is very high on the alignment scale. This paper should be an example for the future so what a rough draft is supposed to look like with technical analysis 9.I do not have any suggestions for your paper at this time.

Again overall this was a great rough draft I don’t have anything to say about a weakness because I wish I was my paper as good as you did!...