Ch 13 - Peer Relationships PDF

Title Ch 13 - Peer Relationships
Course Human Development
Institution Georgia Institute of Technology
Pages 5
File Size 141.2 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 50
Total Views 180

Summary

Lecture Notes for Chapter 13...


Description

Ch. 13 Peer Relationships What is the definition of peers (not to be confused with “friends”)? 

PEERS  people of approximately the same age & status who are not family

How do children define a good friend? Know how this might change over time as they age 

Friendships close reciprocated positive relationship b/w people; closeness, companionship, affection o Usually develops at age 2/3 o Preferences specific playmates On what basis do they select friends? Know how this changes over time as they age o PRESCHOOL  proximity is the key factor in friendship selection; similarity in age  Preference: same-sex friends; less degree friends same race (exposure) o 6-8 YEARS  peers who are similar to themselves in cognitive maturity of their play & aggressive behavior  preference: actual activities; view friend’s rewards & costs o Early School & Adolescence  in terms mutual liking, closeness, & loyalty  Preference: friends similar in prosocial behavior, antisocial behavior, peer acceptance, & academic motivation o ADOLESCENCE  context for self-exploration & working out problems  Preference: similar interest, attitudes, behavior

What functions do friendships serve? o Context for development of social skills o Friendship promote cognitive skills & enhance performance on creative tasks o Provide source emotional support & security o Important during difficult transient periods & adolescence o Buffer against unpleasant experiences: o Victimized by peers, children showed increases in adjustment problems a year later were those who did not have reciprocated best friendships Young children’s “social networks” - what are Cliques, Crowds, Gangs? o Peers in groups: o Preschool  clear dominance hierarchy among peer group members o Middle childhood  involves more than dominance; concerned about peer status o Cliques  small group of friends who spend time together & develop close relationship (cheer group vs dance group) o Middle school cliques usually same sex; adolescence increasing social interactions o Adolescence  many ties to many cliques & increase in stability of cliques  More autonomous & tend to look individual relationship than group ones

 Girls tend to be more integrated into cliques; boys’ greater diversity  By high school  often include both sexes o Crowds  large, reputation-based groups that are based on shared stereotype; members don’t necessarily spent time together (Georgia vs Georgia Tech students) o Gangs loosely organized groups of adolescents or young adults that identify as a group; often illegal activities o Family & cultural influences

When do romantic relationships start? What predicts good healthy romantic relationships? o In US small amount start relationships at 12-years and majority by age 18 o Quality of adolescents appears to mirror quality of their other relationships (w/ parents & peers) o Young  partner that brings status o Older  based on compatibility & enhance intimacy o SHAPING: o Family composition & adult behaviors o Peers; social media o Area  teens in south tend highest rates of sex o Poverty, ethnicity o Positive Effects: o Feelings of self-worth & self-competence o Improve functioning in adolescence who are prone to depression/aggression o Negative Effects: o Early dating & sexual activity is associated with engaging risky behaviors o Girls vulnerable to depression after bad breakup Peer Status How do we measure Peer Status? o MOST COMMON  ask children to rate how much like/dislike their classmate or nominate some of those whom they like most/least; do/don’t like to play with o Sociometric status  measurement of the degree to which children are liked or disliked by their peers as a group o Characteristics associated with sociometric status  Attractiveness, athletic ability, social behavior, personality, goals  Influenced by status of child’s friends What are the Sociometric Status categories and what skills are associated with each? **don’t worry too much about ‘average’ category but definitely know the qualities of the other types o POPULAR  o Receive many positive nominations & few negative o Skilled at initiating interactions & maintain positive relationship

o

o

o o

o Cooperative, friendly, sociable, & sensitive o Not prone to intense negative emotions & regulate themselves well o Tend to be less aggressive REJECTED  o Receive many negative nominations & few positives o Liked by few peers & disliked by many peers o Aggressive-rejected vs withdrawn-rejected NEGLECTED  o Low in social impact; not liked or disliked; simply go unnoticed o Relatively few behaviors that differ greatly from those many children o Neglected primarily b/c NOT NOTICED AVERAGE o Average number both positive & negative nominations CONTROVERSIAL  o Many positive & many negative nominations; noticed by peers & are liked by quite a few people & disliked by few others o Characteristics both popular & rejected children o “arrogant or snobbish”

How are Aggressive-Rejected Vs Withdrawn-Rejected children different from one another? o Aggressive-Rejected  o Prone to hostile & threatening & disruptive behavior, physical aggression, o When angry, many engage in relational aggression o Aggressive behavior often underlies rejection by peers o Some develop network of aggressive friends o Withdrawn-Rejected  o Socially withdrawn, wary, often timid o Withdrawn behavior combined with negative actions/emotions is correlated to rejection; pattern may change with age What kind of deficits do rejected children possess and how can we help them?? o Rejected children, esp. those with aggression, more likely than peers to have difficulties in academic domain o Poorly in school worsens over time How likely will sociometric status stick? 



Which categories change over time, which do not as much? o Remain  popular & rejected o Change  neglected & controversial o Rejected children stability in status generally higher than other categories & may increase with age with socially withdrawn children it can have negative outcomes in adults



o men  less stable careers & marriages than their peers o women  less likely than other women to have careers outside the home Some rejected children have externalizing problems, others have internalizing problems o Rejected children who are victimized  risk loneliness & internalizing behavior

What role(s) do parents play in children’s peer relationships? Origins of individual differences in aggression What are biological factors? Environmental factors? 





Biological  contribute to individual difference in aggression o Neither necessary nor sufficient cause aggressive behavior most children o Low self-regulation elicits harsher discipline; out of control force parents to givein Environmental  quality of parenting o Abusive parenting provides a model of aggression o Inconsistent parenting, without follow-through, reinforces child aggression o LOW SES  greater stressors in families & increase risk child aggressive behaviors Aggression: rates in male’s vs females? Peak ages? o More aggression in males than females o Aggression rate as young kid is similar to when they are older (self-rating)

Describe Oppositional Defiant Disorder Vs Conduct Disorder  

Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD)  angry, defiant behavior that is age inappropriate & persistent Conduct Disorder (CD)  more antisocial & aggressive behavior that inflict pain on others & are frequently accompanied by persistent school absence; running away from home b4 13 How do we treat ODD/CD? 



ODD: o o CD o o

3% youth in US have average onset 6 years 6-16 % males & 2-9 % females average onset 11 years

What are the 3 pathways to CD?  

Early authority conflict  stubborn behavior, defiance & authority avoidance Covert  minor covert behaviors, property damage, mod to serious form delinquency



Overt  aggression, fighting, & violence (comorbidity w/ hyperactivity & substances)

Neural Signature with Antisocial Behavior   

Amygdala  regulates arousal, emotion, threat, fear o Youth with increase callous/unemotional trait lowered reactivity of amygdala Pre-frontal Cortex  integrates emotion, memory, high order sensory, decision making o Antisocial behavior youth to differ in response to learning & reward paradigms and in brain areas associated with that functioning Research with adult psychopaths  some deficits in same regions...


Similar Free PDFs