Concept Map Rubric PDF

Preview

Summary

rubric...

Description

Rocks: Concept Map Rubric

Criteria Content and concepts (x2)

Above Standard (4) The output shows an excellent understanding of the topic's concepts; and uses appropriate terminology and notations.

Standard (3)

Progressing (2)

Emerging (1)

The output shows a good understanding of the topic's concepts; and uses appropriate terminology and notations

The output shows basic understanding of the concept. Made some mistakes in terminologies with a few misconceptions.

The output shows no or very little understanding of the topic's concept . Appropriate terminologies are not followed. Concepts are presented with little detail.

Required Elements The poster includes all All required elements

All but 1 of the required Several required elements are included elements were missing. on the poster.

required elements as well as additional information.

are included on the poster.

Graphics -Clarity

Elements are all focused on topic and the content easily viewed and identified.

Most elements are focused on topic and the content easily viewed and identified.

Relationship among concepts

Connections indicate superior organization and understanding and enhance meaning. Connections are clear and logical. They connect concepts to promote clarity and convey meaning.

Some connections are Connections are not clear and incorrect. somewhat clear and convey some meaning. Only some connections are incorrect.

Organization

The work is organized The work is well organized. It is logical but some concepts are not covered. and coherent. All key concepts and ideas are well organized.

The work is somewhat organized. Many keywords and concepts are covered but somewhat organized

The work is disorganized, which makes the output sloppy and confusing. It contains very few concepts, and many key words and ideas are missing.

Layout

Map is contained in a single page, has multiple clear hierarchies, is well laid out and provides a sufficient number of relevant examples with links.

Map is not contained in a single page, has unclear hierarchies, is poorly laid out and provides some fairly relevant examples with links.

Map is not contained in a single page, is confusing to read with no hierarchical organization.

Map is contained in a single page, has several clear hierarchies, is fairly well laid out and provides a sufficient number of fairly relevant examples with links.

Most elements are focused on topic, but the content is not easily viewed and identified.

Many elements are unclear.

Connections are not clear and do not promote clarity. Most of the connections are incorrect.

The concept map is acceptably attractive though it may be a bit messy.

Attractiveness

The concept map is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness.

The concept map is attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness.

Grammar

There are no grammatical mistakes on the concept map.

There is 1 grammatical There are 2 mistake on the concept grammatical mistakes on the concept map. map.

Time

The poster was submitted on or before the deadline.

-

The concept map is distractedly messy or very poorly designed. It is not attractive.

There are more than 2 grammatical mistakes on the concept map.

-

Total

/40...